Shortcomings of the environmental behavior of families: excessive consumption
Research Article
How to Cite
Ryumina E.V. Shortcomings of the environmental behavior of families: excessive consumption. Population. 2024. Vol. 27. No. S1. P. 190-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-S1-190-201 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to analyze the attitude of the population towards natural environment and natural resources as a characteristic of human potential. In the first part of the article, the environmental behavior of the population is considered in terms of the propensity to conserve resources and reduce waste generation. Water and energy consumption in everyday life is analyzed in different regions, and their strong differentiation is noted. A similar situation has been found out in the formation of solid municipal waste per capita. There are identified the factors influencing the considered indicators of environmental behavior, the main of which is average per capita income. It is noted that families tend to save their expenses on water and energy consumption, waste management, but not consciously preserve these natural goods themselves. An index of environmental behavior of the population is proposed, which is built from particular indices on water, energy consumption, and waste generation in everyday life. A comparative analysis of the index values for all Russian regions was carried out. The index also makes it possible to track the dynamics of changes in environmental behavior and assess the effectiveness of measures influencing this behavior. In the second part of the article, the issue of environmental behavior of the population is generalized to the analysis of its primary source — the needs of the population. It is shown that the pyramid of needs in the modern world has been transformed, and satisfaction of primary material needs leads not to formation of spiritual demands, but to excessive consumption of material goods. It has been suggested that excessive consumption is even more dangerous for the survival of mankind than overpopulation of the planet. The concept of responsible consumption is considered as a program to combat excessive consumption. It is noted that the problem of greening the needs of the population has not yet found its place in most documents on sustainable development. Since consumer habits and environmental behavior are formed in childhood, the dominant role of the family in environmental education is emphasized.
Keywords:
population, family, environmental behavior, natural resources, waste of consumption, excessive consumption, environmental education
References
1. Ermolaeva P. O., Ermolaeva Yu. V. Kriticheskij analiz zarubezhnykh teorij ekologicheskogo povedeniya [Critical analysis of foreign theories of environmental behavior]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskije i sotsial’nyje peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal]. 2019. No. 4. P. 323–346. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.4.16. (in Russ.)
2. Sawitria D. R, Hadiyantob H., Sudharto P., Hadic P. Pro-environmental behavior from a social-cognitive theory perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2015. Vol. 23. P. 27–33.
3. Baldassare M., Katz C. The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environment and Behavior. 1992. Vol. 24. No. 5. P. 602–616. DOI: 10.1177/0013916592245002
4. Corraliza J. A., Berenguer J. Environmental values, beliefs and actions. Environment and Behavior. 2000. Vol. 32. No. 6. P. 832–848. DOI: 10.1177/00139160021972829
5. Derksen L., Gartrell J. The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review. 1993. Vol. 58. No. 3. P. 434–442. DOI: 10.2307/2095910
6. Yanitsky O. N. Ekosotsial’nyje issledovaniya: mezhdistsiplinarnaya metodologiya, teoriya, praktika. [Ecosocial Research: Interdisciplinary Methodology, Theory, Practice]. Moscow. Institut sotsiologii RAN [Institute of Sociology RAS]. 2016. 327 p. (in Russ.)
7. Yanitsky O., Usacheva O. History of the «Green City» in Russia. Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2017. No. 6. P. 125–131. DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v6i6.1330
8. Potravnaya E. V. Gendernye osobennosti vospriyatiya ekologicheskih problem korennymi narodami Severa Rossii [Gender-specific perceptions of environmental problems by the indigenous peoples of the North of Russia]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 73–84. DOI: 10.19181/population.2020.23.2.7 (in Russ.)
9. Melnikova T. B., Portnova L. V., Obidovskaya N. N., Prikhodko K. S. Mnenie gorozhan Rossii o vovlechyonnosti v ikh zhizn’ okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorij [Opinions of Russian townspeople about involvement of protected natural areas in their life]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 117–130. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.3.10 (in Russ.)
10. Ryumina E. V. Analiz faktorov regional’noj differentsiatsii pokazatelej potrebleniya elektroenergii naseleniem [Analysis of the regional differentiation factors of indicators of electricity consumption by the population of Russia]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 107–116. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.3.9 (in Russ.)
11. Muncy J. A., Vitell S. J. Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research. 1992. No. 24(4). P. 297–311.
12. Kushnaryova A. A. K voprosu o sotsial’no otvetstvennom potreblenii [On the issue of socially responsible consumption]. Vesennije dni nauki VShEM. Sbornik dokladov mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii (Ekaterinburg, 20–22 April, 2017). [Spring Days of Science in VSHEM. Proceedings of the international conference (Ekaterinburg, 20–22 April, 2017)]. Ekaterinburg. 2017. P. 410–413. (in Russ.)
13. Antil J. H. Socially responsible consumers: Profile and implications for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing. 1984. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 18–39.
2. Sawitria D. R, Hadiyantob H., Sudharto P., Hadic P. Pro-environmental behavior from a social-cognitive theory perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2015. Vol. 23. P. 27–33.
3. Baldassare M., Katz C. The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environment and Behavior. 1992. Vol. 24. No. 5. P. 602–616. DOI: 10.1177/0013916592245002
4. Corraliza J. A., Berenguer J. Environmental values, beliefs and actions. Environment and Behavior. 2000. Vol. 32. No. 6. P. 832–848. DOI: 10.1177/00139160021972829
5. Derksen L., Gartrell J. The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review. 1993. Vol. 58. No. 3. P. 434–442. DOI: 10.2307/2095910
6. Yanitsky O. N. Ekosotsial’nyje issledovaniya: mezhdistsiplinarnaya metodologiya, teoriya, praktika. [Ecosocial Research: Interdisciplinary Methodology, Theory, Practice]. Moscow. Institut sotsiologii RAN [Institute of Sociology RAS]. 2016. 327 p. (in Russ.)
7. Yanitsky O., Usacheva O. History of the «Green City» in Russia. Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2017. No. 6. P. 125–131. DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v6i6.1330
8. Potravnaya E. V. Gendernye osobennosti vospriyatiya ekologicheskih problem korennymi narodami Severa Rossii [Gender-specific perceptions of environmental problems by the indigenous peoples of the North of Russia]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 73–84. DOI: 10.19181/population.2020.23.2.7 (in Russ.)
9. Melnikova T. B., Portnova L. V., Obidovskaya N. N., Prikhodko K. S. Mnenie gorozhan Rossii o vovlechyonnosti v ikh zhizn’ okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorij [Opinions of Russian townspeople about involvement of protected natural areas in their life]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 117–130. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.3.10 (in Russ.)
10. Ryumina E. V. Analiz faktorov regional’noj differentsiatsii pokazatelej potrebleniya elektroenergii naseleniem [Analysis of the regional differentiation factors of indicators of electricity consumption by the population of Russia]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 107–116. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.3.9 (in Russ.)
11. Muncy J. A., Vitell S. J. Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research. 1992. No. 24(4). P. 297–311.
12. Kushnaryova A. A. K voprosu o sotsial’no otvetstvennom potreblenii [On the issue of socially responsible consumption]. Vesennije dni nauki VShEM. Sbornik dokladov mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii (Ekaterinburg, 20–22 April, 2017). [Spring Days of Science in VSHEM. Proceedings of the international conference (Ekaterinburg, 20–22 April, 2017)]. Ekaterinburg. 2017. P. 410–413. (in Russ.)
13. Antil J. H. Socially responsible consumers: Profile and implications for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing. 1984. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 18–39.
Article
Received: 27.02.2024
Accepted: 29.05.2024
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Ryumina, E. V. (2024). Shortcomings of the environmental behavior of families: excessive consumption. Population, 27(S1), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-S1-190-201
Section
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROBLEMS OF FAMILIES
