Mechanisms for forming trust in the economy: specifics and assessment of the functional state
Research Article
Acknowledgments
The article is based on the results of the study carried out under the state assignment to the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation.
How to Cite
Frolova E.V., Tyurikov A.G. Mechanisms for forming trust in the economy: specifics and assessment of the functional state. Population. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 14-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-2-14-25 (in Russ.).
Abstract
Trust is one of the most significant drivers of economic development, ensuring an increase in the quality of life of the population and its entrepreneurial activity, and a reduction in transaction costs for business entities. The article substantiates the conclusion that trust is formed, on the one hand, under the influence of information, knowledge, and, on the other, by subject’s personal involvement in communication and activity practices. The authors identify the following mechanisms for formation of trust in the transforming economic relations: information-reflexive, communication-interpretive and activity-based. Information-reflexive and value-normative mechanisms ensure accumulation, systematization and personification of knowledge, values, feelings and meanings that determine trusting interactions in economic relations. Communication and interpretation mechanisms ensure reproduction of trust during internalization and application of accumulated knowledge, learned norms, and values in the process of communication interaction between social actors. Activity mechanisms implement a system-forming function in the formation and development of trust, ensuring transformation of assessments and perceptions of the actions of the «other» in the course of joint activities, the effectiveness of which contributes to consolidation of the existing expectations and attitudes towards trust. A survey of experts made it possible to identify the most significant reasons for the lack of trust: geopolitical tensions, structural and systemic imperfections within the spheres of economic relations themselves, impact of sanctions on the functioning of society and the work of various organizations, and uncertainty of the future. The article presents expert assessments of the functional state of trust formation mechanisms: information-reflexive (3.04 points on a scale from 1 to 5), communication-interpretive (2.92), activity-based (2.8). Details of the experts’ answers illustrate a higher role of educational institutions and professional online communities in the formation of trust in information and meanings transmitted through unofficial channels (blogs, social networks, independent media).
Keywords:
trust, trust deficit, economic relations, geopolitical tension, mechanisms of trust formation
References
1. Shabunova A. A., Guzhavina T. A., Kozhina T. P. Doverije i obshchestvennoje razvitije v Rossii [Trust and social development in Russia]. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of Territory’s Development]. 2015. Vol. 2. No. 76. P. 7–19. (in Russ.)
2. Stolyar V. Yu. Sotsial’no-filosofskij i mezhdisciplinarnyj diskurs o doverii [Sociophilosophical and interdisciplinary discourse on trust]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences]. 2008. No. 77. P. 176–182. (in Russ.)
3. Biricheva E. V. Ekzistentsial’nyj smysl doveriya [Existential sense of trust]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya [Vestnik of St. Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies]. 2023. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 4–17. DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2023.101 (in Russ.)
4. Veselov Yu. V., Skvortsov N. G. Transformatsiya kul’tury doveriya v Rossii [Transformation of the culture of trust in Russia]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskije i sotsial’nyje peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. 2023. No. 1. P. 157–179. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2023.1.2212 (in Russ.)
5. Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V. Faktory formirovaniya doveriya k mestnoj vlasti v Rossijskoj Federatsii na sovremennom etape [Factors for building trust in the Russian Federation local governments under modern conditions]. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravleniya) [Ars Administrandi (The Art of Management)]. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 719–740. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2022-4-719-740 (in Russ.)
6. Guzhavina T. A. Doverije v pandemiyu: sohranit’ nel’zya izmenit’. A chto chuvstvujet region? [Trust in a pandemic: save cannot be changed. What does the region feel?]. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. 2021. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 25–39. DOI: 10.19181Атр.2021.9.3.8431 (in Russ.)
7. Jovanović V., Sarracino F., Lazić M., Gavrilov-Jerković V. Well-being and the pandemic: Trust in people matters more than trust in institutions. Psychological Reports. 2023. Vol. 126. No. 2. P. 674– 687. DOI: 10.1177/00332941211061692
8. Guzhavina T.A., Silina T. A. Doverie v setevom vzaimodejstvii [Trust in the network cooperation]. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of Territory’s Development]. 2016. No. 6(86). P. 147–166. (in Russ.)
9. Kalyuzhnova N. Ya. Ekonomika nedoveriya (institut doveriya i jego rol’ v konkurentosposobnosti regionov) [Economy of distrust (the institute of trust and its role in the regional competitiveness)]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Regions]. 2014. No. 1. P. 56–65. DOI: 10.17059/2014-1-4 (in Russ.)
10. Aleksandrova O. A. Obespechenije atmosfery doveriya kak uslovije ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Providing the atmosphere of trust as a condition of economic development]. Ekonomicheskoje vozrozhdenije Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia]. 2019. No. 3(61). P. 71–81. (in Russ.)
11. Brzoza-Brzezina M., Kotłowski J. International confidence spillovers and business cycles in small open economies. Empirical Economics. 2021. Vol. 61. P. 773–798. DOI: 10.1007/s00181-020-01887-3
12. Ghosh S. Consumer confidence and consumer spending in Brazil: A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model analysis. Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 53–85. DOI: 10.1177/0976747919898906
13. Proskurina A. S. Dinamicheskij resurs doveriya v ekonomicheskikh otnosheniyakh — rossijskij kraudfuanding v sotsial’noj sfere [Dynamic confidence resource in economic relations — Russian crowdfunding in the social sphere]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development]. 2022. No. 8(174). P. 42–48. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2022.8.5 (in Russ.)
14. Gurianov P. A. Institut doveriya i institutsional’nyje problemy pri postrojenii innovatsionnoj ekonomiki v Rossii [Institute of trust and institutional problems in building an innovative economy in Russia]. Nauchnyj zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya «Ekonomika i ekologicheskij menedzhment» [Scientific Journal NRU ITMO. Series «Economics and Environmental Management»]. 2021. No. 3. P. 35– 46. DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2021-14-3-35-46 (in Russ.)
15. Solodovnikov S. Yu. Nekotoryje aktual’nyje riski, voznikayushchije pri mezhstranovoj tekhnologicheskoj kooperatsii v kontekste perekhoda k industrii 4.0 i rol’ sotsial’nogo kapitala i ekonomiki doveriya v ikh minimizatsii v respublike Belarus’ [Some current risks arising from cross-country technological cooperation in the context of the transition to industry 4.0 and the role of social capital and the economy of trust in minimizing them in the Republic of Belarus]. Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitije, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo [Greater Eurasia: Development, Security, Cooperation]. 2022. Vol. 5. Part 1. P. 534–536. (in Russ.)
16. Tyurikov A. G., Kunizheva D. A., Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V. Doverije k distantsionnomu obucheniyu v usloviyah pandemii: otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya studentov i prepodavatelej rossijskih vuzov [Trust in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evaluation of the quality of education of students and teachers of Russian universities]. Obrazovanije i nauka [The Education and Science Journal]. 2022. Vol. 24. No. 6. P. 177–200. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-6-177-200 (in Russ.)
17. Polyushkevich O. A. Doverije v menyayushchemsya mire [Trust in a changing world]. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2021. No. 2. P. 87–92. (in Russ.)
18. Alekseev M. S. Doverije naseleniya k organam vlasti v informatsionnom obshchestve: teoretiko-metodologicheskije osnovy izucheniya [Public trust in the authorities in the information society: theoretical and methodological bases of studying]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science]. 2023. No. 71. P. 177–191. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/71/17 (in Russ.)
19. Mersiyanova I. V. Doverije naseleniya k NKO [Public trust in NPOs]. Informatsionno-analiticheskij byulleten’ o razvitii grazhdanskogo obshchestva i nekommercheskogo sektora v RF [Information and Analytical Bulletin on the Development of Civil Society and the Non-Profit Sector in the Russian Federation]. 2014. No. 4. P. 15–19. (in Russ.)
20. Sinkevich A. I. Mezhdunarodnaya praktika otsenki urovnya doveriya bankam [International practice of assessing the level of trust in banks]. Ekonomika i banki [Economy and Banks]. 2021. No. 2. P. 31–39. (in Russ.)
21. Lee J. I., Dirks K. T., Campagna R. L. At the heart of trust: Understanding the integral relationship between emotion and trust. Group and Organization Management. 2023. Vol. 48. No. 2. P. 546–580. DOI: 10.1177/10596011221118499
22. Bikmetov E. Yu., Lukianov A. V., Pushkaryova M. A. Soderzhatel’nyj aspekt ekzistentsii doveriya [Content aspect of the existence of trust]. Manuskript [Manuscript]. 2018. No. 7(93). P. 74–78. (in Russ.)
23. Glushko I. V. Ambivalentnyj kharakter doveriya v kommunikativnykh sotsial’nykh praktikakh sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva [The ambivalent nature of trust in the communicative social practices of modern Russian society]. Kontsept [Concept]. 2018. No. 9. P. 228–233. (in Russ.)
24. Ivanova Ya. S., Antonyuk V. P., Tyurikov A. G. Doverije studencheskoj molodyozhi k transportnoj ekonomike sovmestnogo potrebleniya [Student youth trust in the transport sharing economy]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standard of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2023. Vol. 19. No.2. P. 272–283. DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836-2023-19-2-10-272-283 (in Russ.)
25. Treskin P. A. Uroven’ doveriya naseleniya Bajkal’skogo regiona k deyatel’nosti obshchestvennykh organizatsij [The level of public confidence in the Baikal region in the activities of public organizations]. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2019. No. 1. P. 163–166. (in Russ.)
26. Noskova O. G. Deyatel’nost’ [Activity]. Znanije. Ponimanije. Umenije [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. 2004. No. 1. P. 135. (in Russ.)
27. Vakhtina M. A. Doverie k gosudarstvu kak faktor povysheniya ego effektivnosti [Trust in the state as a factor in increasing its effectiveness]. Nauchnyye trudy Donetskogo natsional’nogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: ekonomicheskaya [Scientific Works of Donetsk National Technical University. Series: Economic]. 2011. Vol. 3. No. 3. P. 57–65. (in Russ.)
28. Koroleva E. A. Eksternalii politiki sanktsionnogo davleniya i yeyo posledstviya dlya razvitiya rossijskogo malogo i srednego biznesa [Externalities of the sanctions pressure policy and its consequences for the Russian small and medium business development]. [Russian Journal of Economics and Law]. 2023. Vol.17. No. 3. P. 515–531. DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.515-531 (in Russ.)
29. Ustinova O. V., Pivovarova I. V. Preodolenije krizisa instituta sem’i v Rossii [Overcoming the family institution crisis in Russia]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnyh zavedenij. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika [News from Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economy. Politics]. 2014. No.1. P. 78–82. (in Russ.)
30. Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V., Razov P. V. Initsiativnoje byudzhetirovanije kak mekhanizm povysheniya kachestva zhizni naseleniya [Initiative budgeting as a mechanism for raising the quality of life of the population]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 66–77. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.2.6 (in Russ.)
31. Pashuta V. L., Dubinin V. O. Slozhnosti gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva i aktivizatsii investitsionnoj deyatel’nosti v Rossii [Challenges of public-private partnerships and activation of investment activities in Russia]. Zhurnal prikladnyh issledovanij [Journal of Applied Research]. 2021. No. 1–2. P. 68–71. (in Russ.)
2. Stolyar V. Yu. Sotsial’no-filosofskij i mezhdisciplinarnyj diskurs o doverii [Sociophilosophical and interdisciplinary discourse on trust]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences]. 2008. No. 77. P. 176–182. (in Russ.)
3. Biricheva E. V. Ekzistentsial’nyj smysl doveriya [Existential sense of trust]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya [Vestnik of St. Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies]. 2023. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 4–17. DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2023.101 (in Russ.)
4. Veselov Yu. V., Skvortsov N. G. Transformatsiya kul’tury doveriya v Rossii [Transformation of the culture of trust in Russia]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskije i sotsial’nyje peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. 2023. No. 1. P. 157–179. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2023.1.2212 (in Russ.)
5. Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V. Faktory formirovaniya doveriya k mestnoj vlasti v Rossijskoj Federatsii na sovremennom etape [Factors for building trust in the Russian Federation local governments under modern conditions]. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravleniya) [Ars Administrandi (The Art of Management)]. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 719–740. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2022-4-719-740 (in Russ.)
6. Guzhavina T. A. Doverije v pandemiyu: sohranit’ nel’zya izmenit’. A chto chuvstvujet region? [Trust in a pandemic: save cannot be changed. What does the region feel?]. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. 2021. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 25–39. DOI: 10.19181Атр.2021.9.3.8431 (in Russ.)
7. Jovanović V., Sarracino F., Lazić M., Gavrilov-Jerković V. Well-being and the pandemic: Trust in people matters more than trust in institutions. Psychological Reports. 2023. Vol. 126. No. 2. P. 674– 687. DOI: 10.1177/00332941211061692
8. Guzhavina T.A., Silina T. A. Doverie v setevom vzaimodejstvii [Trust in the network cooperation]. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of Territory’s Development]. 2016. No. 6(86). P. 147–166. (in Russ.)
9. Kalyuzhnova N. Ya. Ekonomika nedoveriya (institut doveriya i jego rol’ v konkurentosposobnosti regionov) [Economy of distrust (the institute of trust and its role in the regional competitiveness)]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Regions]. 2014. No. 1. P. 56–65. DOI: 10.17059/2014-1-4 (in Russ.)
10. Aleksandrova O. A. Obespechenije atmosfery doveriya kak uslovije ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Providing the atmosphere of trust as a condition of economic development]. Ekonomicheskoje vozrozhdenije Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia]. 2019. No. 3(61). P. 71–81. (in Russ.)
11. Brzoza-Brzezina M., Kotłowski J. International confidence spillovers and business cycles in small open economies. Empirical Economics. 2021. Vol. 61. P. 773–798. DOI: 10.1007/s00181-020-01887-3
12. Ghosh S. Consumer confidence and consumer spending in Brazil: A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model analysis. Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 53–85. DOI: 10.1177/0976747919898906
13. Proskurina A. S. Dinamicheskij resurs doveriya v ekonomicheskikh otnosheniyakh — rossijskij kraudfuanding v sotsial’noj sfere [Dynamic confidence resource in economic relations — Russian crowdfunding in the social sphere]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development]. 2022. No. 8(174). P. 42–48. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2022.8.5 (in Russ.)
14. Gurianov P. A. Institut doveriya i institutsional’nyje problemy pri postrojenii innovatsionnoj ekonomiki v Rossii [Institute of trust and institutional problems in building an innovative economy in Russia]. Nauchnyj zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya «Ekonomika i ekologicheskij menedzhment» [Scientific Journal NRU ITMO. Series «Economics and Environmental Management»]. 2021. No. 3. P. 35– 46. DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2021-14-3-35-46 (in Russ.)
15. Solodovnikov S. Yu. Nekotoryje aktual’nyje riski, voznikayushchije pri mezhstranovoj tekhnologicheskoj kooperatsii v kontekste perekhoda k industrii 4.0 i rol’ sotsial’nogo kapitala i ekonomiki doveriya v ikh minimizatsii v respublike Belarus’ [Some current risks arising from cross-country technological cooperation in the context of the transition to industry 4.0 and the role of social capital and the economy of trust in minimizing them in the Republic of Belarus]. Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitije, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo [Greater Eurasia: Development, Security, Cooperation]. 2022. Vol. 5. Part 1. P. 534–536. (in Russ.)
16. Tyurikov A. G., Kunizheva D. A., Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V. Doverije k distantsionnomu obucheniyu v usloviyah pandemii: otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya studentov i prepodavatelej rossijskih vuzov [Trust in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evaluation of the quality of education of students and teachers of Russian universities]. Obrazovanije i nauka [The Education and Science Journal]. 2022. Vol. 24. No. 6. P. 177–200. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-6-177-200 (in Russ.)
17. Polyushkevich O. A. Doverije v menyayushchemsya mire [Trust in a changing world]. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2021. No. 2. P. 87–92. (in Russ.)
18. Alekseev M. S. Doverije naseleniya k organam vlasti v informatsionnom obshchestve: teoretiko-metodologicheskije osnovy izucheniya [Public trust in the authorities in the information society: theoretical and methodological bases of studying]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science]. 2023. No. 71. P. 177–191. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/71/17 (in Russ.)
19. Mersiyanova I. V. Doverije naseleniya k NKO [Public trust in NPOs]. Informatsionno-analiticheskij byulleten’ o razvitii grazhdanskogo obshchestva i nekommercheskogo sektora v RF [Information and Analytical Bulletin on the Development of Civil Society and the Non-Profit Sector in the Russian Federation]. 2014. No. 4. P. 15–19. (in Russ.)
20. Sinkevich A. I. Mezhdunarodnaya praktika otsenki urovnya doveriya bankam [International practice of assessing the level of trust in banks]. Ekonomika i banki [Economy and Banks]. 2021. No. 2. P. 31–39. (in Russ.)
21. Lee J. I., Dirks K. T., Campagna R. L. At the heart of trust: Understanding the integral relationship between emotion and trust. Group and Organization Management. 2023. Vol. 48. No. 2. P. 546–580. DOI: 10.1177/10596011221118499
22. Bikmetov E. Yu., Lukianov A. V., Pushkaryova M. A. Soderzhatel’nyj aspekt ekzistentsii doveriya [Content aspect of the existence of trust]. Manuskript [Manuscript]. 2018. No. 7(93). P. 74–78. (in Russ.)
23. Glushko I. V. Ambivalentnyj kharakter doveriya v kommunikativnykh sotsial’nykh praktikakh sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva [The ambivalent nature of trust in the communicative social practices of modern Russian society]. Kontsept [Concept]. 2018. No. 9. P. 228–233. (in Russ.)
24. Ivanova Ya. S., Antonyuk V. P., Tyurikov A. G. Doverije studencheskoj molodyozhi k transportnoj ekonomike sovmestnogo potrebleniya [Student youth trust in the transport sharing economy]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standard of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2023. Vol. 19. No.2. P. 272–283. DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836-2023-19-2-10-272-283 (in Russ.)
25. Treskin P. A. Uroven’ doveriya naseleniya Bajkal’skogo regiona k deyatel’nosti obshchestvennykh organizatsij [The level of public confidence in the Baikal region in the activities of public organizations]. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2019. No. 1. P. 163–166. (in Russ.)
26. Noskova O. G. Deyatel’nost’ [Activity]. Znanije. Ponimanije. Umenije [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. 2004. No. 1. P. 135. (in Russ.)
27. Vakhtina M. A. Doverie k gosudarstvu kak faktor povysheniya ego effektivnosti [Trust in the state as a factor in increasing its effectiveness]. Nauchnyye trudy Donetskogo natsional’nogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: ekonomicheskaya [Scientific Works of Donetsk National Technical University. Series: Economic]. 2011. Vol. 3. No. 3. P. 57–65. (in Russ.)
28. Koroleva E. A. Eksternalii politiki sanktsionnogo davleniya i yeyo posledstviya dlya razvitiya rossijskogo malogo i srednego biznesa [Externalities of the sanctions pressure policy and its consequences for the Russian small and medium business development]. [Russian Journal of Economics and Law]. 2023. Vol.17. No. 3. P. 515–531. DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.515-531 (in Russ.)
29. Ustinova O. V., Pivovarova I. V. Preodolenije krizisa instituta sem’i v Rossii [Overcoming the family institution crisis in Russia]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnyh zavedenij. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika [News from Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economy. Politics]. 2014. No.1. P. 78–82. (in Russ.)
30. Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V., Razov P. V. Initsiativnoje byudzhetirovanije kak mekhanizm povysheniya kachestva zhizni naseleniya [Initiative budgeting as a mechanism for raising the quality of life of the population]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 66–77. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.2.6 (in Russ.)
31. Pashuta V. L., Dubinin V. O. Slozhnosti gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva i aktivizatsii investitsionnoj deyatel’nosti v Rossii [Challenges of public-private partnerships and activation of investment activities in Russia]. Zhurnal prikladnyh issledovanij [Journal of Applied Research]. 2021. No. 1–2. P. 68–71. (in Russ.)
Article
Received: 04.10.2023
Accepted: 18.06.2024
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Frolova, E. V., & Tyurikov, A. G. (2024). Mechanisms for forming trust in the economy: specifics and assessment of the functional state. Population, 27(2), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-2-14-25
Section
CONDITIONS AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF POULATION
