The methodology of ranking federal districts by socio-economic indicators
Research Article
How to Cite
Kroshilin S.V., Medvedeva E.I. The methodology of ranking federal districts by socio-economic indicators. Population. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 85-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-85-97 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to develop and test a methodology for ranking federal districts by socio-economic indicators. The methodology is built on an integral assessment based on the calculation of ratings of selected (chosen) categories and subcategories, which to a certain extent can characterize the studied indicators. For calculations, the authors use socio-economic indicators of Rosstat (data showcases Regions of Russia — Socio-economic indicators). The proposed approach is universal, since it can be based both on statistical data and on the results of empirical studies. It is possible to include additional parameters in the list of categories and subcategories based on the final goals and subtasks of building a rating. There is an option to visualize the obtained rating data on the basis of the results entered into the final rating matrix using markers of the «traffic light» type. The proposed method has been tested and proved its viability. According to the results, Central Federal District is the leader in all categories and subcategories (Rating =1). In second place is Northwestern Federal District (Rating = 2), in third place is the Southern Federal District (Rating = 3). The rest of the federal districts occupy lower positions, but the use of ranking and markers like «traffic light» allows you to visualize the calculated data and highlight critical categories. The developed approach can be useful to specialists, scientists, researchers and administrative workers who deal with the problems of development and assessment of socio-economic indicators of the population.
Keywords:
quality of life of population, socio-economic indicators, rating, rating of regions, methods of assessing the quality of life, ranking of federal districts
References
1. Kakwani N. Welfare measures: An international comparison. Journal of Development Economics. 1981. Vol. 8(1). P. 21–45. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(81)90044-4
2. Lambert P. The Distribution and Redistribution of Income (third ed.). Manchester University Press. UK. 2002. 336 p.
3. Gamukin V. V. Determinanty finansovogo blagosostojanija naselenija Tjumenskoj oblasti [Determinants of financial well-being of the population of Tyumen oblast]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 148–162. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.4.13 (in Russ.)
4. Pyzhev A. I., Pyzheva Yu. I. Otsenka regional’nogo sotsio-ekologo-ekonomicheskogo blagopoluchija Krasnojarskogo kraja: novyj podhod [Evaluation of regional ecological and socio-economic well-being of the Krasnoyarsk krai: a new approach]. Regional’naja ekonomika: teorija i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice]. 2015. No. 34(409). P. 30–40. (in Russ.)
5. Medvedeva E. I., Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Schast’je i blagopoluchije: osnovnyje determinanty v sovremennom mire [Happiness and well-being: the main determinants in the modern world]. Diskussija [Discussion]. 2023. No. 2(117). P. 14–26. DOI: 10.46320/2077-7639-2023-2-117-14-26 (in Russ.)
6. Linder P. Factor decomposition of the wealth distribution in euro area. Empirica. 2015. Vol. 42(2). P. 291–322. DOI: 10.1007/s10663-015-9290-6
7. Kroshilin S. V., Medvedeva E. I., Yarasheva A. V. Postrojenije modeli otsenki udovletvorjonnosti kachestvom zhizni: ekonometricheskij podhod [Creating a model for assessing satisfaction with the quality of life: an econometric approach]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 87–98. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.4.8 (in Russ.)
8. Aleksandrova O. A., Alikperova N. V., Vershinina M. A., et al. Finansovoje povedenije naselenija (monitoringovoje issledovanije) [Financial Behavior of the Population (Monitoring Study)]. FNISTs RAN [Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology RAS]. Moscow. 2023. 270 p. DOI: 10.19181/MONOGR.978-5-89697-422-2.2023 (in Russ.)
9. Lokosov V. V., Ryumina E. V., Ulyanov V. V. Klasterizatsija regionov Rossii po pokazatelam kachestva zhizni i kachestva naselenija [Clustering of regions by indicators of quality of life and quality of population]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2019. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 4–17. DOI: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00035 (in Russ.)
10. Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Regional’nyje aspekty izmenenija kachestva zhizni rossijan [Regional aspects of changing the quality of life of Russians]. Regional’nyje problemy preobrazovanija ekonomiki [Regional Aspects of Economic Transformation]. 2023. No. 10(156). P. 38–46. DOI: 10.26726/1812-7096-2023-10-38-46 (in Russ.)
11. Nozdrina N. N., Schneiderman I. M. Kachestvo zhizni i zhilischnyje uslovija naselenija v krupnejshikh aglomeratsijakh i gorodakh-millionnikakh Rossii [Quality of life and housing conditions of the population in the largest agglomerations and million-plus cities of Russia]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2022. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 4–17. DOI: 10.19181/population.2022.25.1.1 (in Russ.)
12. Aivazian S. A. K metodologii izmerenija sinteticheskikh kategorij kachestva zhizni naselenija [Towards a methodology of measuring of the population’s life quality synthesized categories]. Ekonomika i matematicheskije metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods]. 2003. Vol. 39. No. 2. P. 33–53 (in Russ.)
13. Kamalova P. M. Integral’naja otsenka urovnja kachestva zhizni naselenija regiona na osnove formalizovannoj protsedury [Integral assessment of the quality of life of the population of the region on the basis of a formalized procedure]. Aktual’nyje voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk [Current Issues of Economic Sciences]. 2014. No. 37. P. 96–102 (in Russ.)
14. Gurban I. A. Rejtingovanije territorij kak instrument izmerenija regional’nogo blagopoluchija [Territorial rating as a tool to measure the well-being of regions]. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teorija i praktika [Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice]. 2015. No. 42(441). P. 36–51 (in Russ.)
15. Malkina M. Y. Sotsial’noje blagopoluchije regionov Rossijskoj Federatsii [Social well-being of the Russian Federation regions]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Regions]. 2017. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 49–62. DOI: 10.17059/2017-1-5 (in Russ.)
16. Shabunova A. A., Kalachikova O. N., Leonidova G. V., et al. Sotsial’noje razvitije territorij: aktual’nyje trendy i novye vyzovy [Social Development of Territories: Current Trends and New Challenges]. Vologodskij nauchnyj tsentr Rossijskoj akademii nauk [Vologda Research Center RAS]. Vologda. 2022. 295 p. (in Russ.)
2. Lambert P. The Distribution and Redistribution of Income (third ed.). Manchester University Press. UK. 2002. 336 p.
3. Gamukin V. V. Determinanty finansovogo blagosostojanija naselenija Tjumenskoj oblasti [Determinants of financial well-being of the population of Tyumen oblast]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 148–162. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.4.13 (in Russ.)
4. Pyzhev A. I., Pyzheva Yu. I. Otsenka regional’nogo sotsio-ekologo-ekonomicheskogo blagopoluchija Krasnojarskogo kraja: novyj podhod [Evaluation of regional ecological and socio-economic well-being of the Krasnoyarsk krai: a new approach]. Regional’naja ekonomika: teorija i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice]. 2015. No. 34(409). P. 30–40. (in Russ.)
5. Medvedeva E. I., Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Schast’je i blagopoluchije: osnovnyje determinanty v sovremennom mire [Happiness and well-being: the main determinants in the modern world]. Diskussija [Discussion]. 2023. No. 2(117). P. 14–26. DOI: 10.46320/2077-7639-2023-2-117-14-26 (in Russ.)
6. Linder P. Factor decomposition of the wealth distribution in euro area. Empirica. 2015. Vol. 42(2). P. 291–322. DOI: 10.1007/s10663-015-9290-6
7. Kroshilin S. V., Medvedeva E. I., Yarasheva A. V. Postrojenije modeli otsenki udovletvorjonnosti kachestvom zhizni: ekonometricheskij podhod [Creating a model for assessing satisfaction with the quality of life: an econometric approach]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 87–98. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.4.8 (in Russ.)
8. Aleksandrova O. A., Alikperova N. V., Vershinina M. A., et al. Finansovoje povedenije naselenija (monitoringovoje issledovanije) [Financial Behavior of the Population (Monitoring Study)]. FNISTs RAN [Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology RAS]. Moscow. 2023. 270 p. DOI: 10.19181/MONOGR.978-5-89697-422-2.2023 (in Russ.)
9. Lokosov V. V., Ryumina E. V., Ulyanov V. V. Klasterizatsija regionov Rossii po pokazatelam kachestva zhizni i kachestva naselenija [Clustering of regions by indicators of quality of life and quality of population]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2019. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 4–17. DOI: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00035 (in Russ.)
10. Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Regional’nyje aspekty izmenenija kachestva zhizni rossijan [Regional aspects of changing the quality of life of Russians]. Regional’nyje problemy preobrazovanija ekonomiki [Regional Aspects of Economic Transformation]. 2023. No. 10(156). P. 38–46. DOI: 10.26726/1812-7096-2023-10-38-46 (in Russ.)
11. Nozdrina N. N., Schneiderman I. M. Kachestvo zhizni i zhilischnyje uslovija naselenija v krupnejshikh aglomeratsijakh i gorodakh-millionnikakh Rossii [Quality of life and housing conditions of the population in the largest agglomerations and million-plus cities of Russia]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2022. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 4–17. DOI: 10.19181/population.2022.25.1.1 (in Russ.)
12. Aivazian S. A. K metodologii izmerenija sinteticheskikh kategorij kachestva zhizni naselenija [Towards a methodology of measuring of the population’s life quality synthesized categories]. Ekonomika i matematicheskije metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods]. 2003. Vol. 39. No. 2. P. 33–53 (in Russ.)
13. Kamalova P. M. Integral’naja otsenka urovnja kachestva zhizni naselenija regiona na osnove formalizovannoj protsedury [Integral assessment of the quality of life of the population of the region on the basis of a formalized procedure]. Aktual’nyje voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk [Current Issues of Economic Sciences]. 2014. No. 37. P. 96–102 (in Russ.)
14. Gurban I. A. Rejtingovanije territorij kak instrument izmerenija regional’nogo blagopoluchija [Territorial rating as a tool to measure the well-being of regions]. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teorija i praktika [Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice]. 2015. No. 42(441). P. 36–51 (in Russ.)
15. Malkina M. Y. Sotsial’noje blagopoluchije regionov Rossijskoj Federatsii [Social well-being of the Russian Federation regions]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Regions]. 2017. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 49–62. DOI: 10.17059/2017-1-5 (in Russ.)
16. Shabunova A. A., Kalachikova O. N., Leonidova G. V., et al. Sotsial’noje razvitije territorij: aktual’nyje trendy i novye vyzovy [Social Development of Territories: Current Trends and New Challenges]. Vologodskij nauchnyj tsentr Rossijskoj akademii nauk [Vologda Research Center RAS]. Vologda. 2022. 295 p. (in Russ.)
Article
Received: 30.03.2024
Accepted: 20.09.2024
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Kroshilin, S. V., & Medvedeva, E. I. (2024). The methodology of ranking federal districts by socio-economic indicators. Population, 27(3), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-85-97
Section
CONDITIONS AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF POULATION
