Socio-cultural features of the population of the Arctic region and practices of human capital reproduction: is there a connection?

Research Article
  • Alexander D. Volkov Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia kov8vol@gmail.com ORCID ID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-8483
    SPIN 2133-8597
  • Alexander O. Averianov Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS; Budget Monitoring Center of Petrozavodsk State University, Petrozavodsk, Russia aver@petrsu.ru ORCID ID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2884-8110
    SPIN 1194-8767
  • Natalia A. Roslyakova Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS; V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Science RAS, Moscow, Russia na@roslyakova24.ru ORCID ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-2141
    SPIN 7405-4998
  • Anastasia V. Vasilieva Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia vasnask@gmail.com ORCID ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6019-819X
    SPIN 2815-9484
Acknowledgments
The research was carried out within the RSF project No. 23–78–10192. URL: https://rscf.ru/ project/23–78–10192/.
How to Cite
Volkov A.D., Averianov A.O., Roslyakova N.A., Vasilieva A.V. Socio-cultural features of the population of the Arctic region and practices of human capital reproduction: is there a connection?. Population. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 124-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-124-136 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The presented work is devoted to study of the sociocultural characteristics of the population of Arctic Karelia and identification of the connections between these characteristics and practices of human capital reproduction. The information basis was made up of the data from a survey of the population of the region under consideration (n=1042), carried out in the fall of 2023. The tasks of identifying the values of sociocultural characteristics of the population of Arctic Karelia and its territories, as well as identifying the relationships between the values of sociocultural characteristics and the planned measures and practices of respondents in the field of human capital reproduction were solved. Hypotheses were put forward about the connection between the sociocultural characteristics «uncertainty avoidance» and «long-term goal setting» on the one hand, and the characteristics of respondent’s activity on the other hand. Methods of analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Tukey HSD test and Dunnett’s test were used. As a result of the study, the sociocultural characteristics of the population of Arctic Karelia were identified. The assumptions were confirmed that the value of the «uncertainty avoidance» indicator among entrepreneurs is lower than in the group of employees (public sector and private sector), while the value of the «long-term goal setting» indicator, on the contrary, is higher. While the differences in the planned measures for development of human capital between respondents have certain correspondences with the differentiation of sociocultural characteristics, we associate them primarily with characteristics of age groups, as well as gender of respondents. The presented results contribute to conceptual updating of the scientific and information base of the institutional designing of the Russian Arctic and are intended to lay the information and analytical foundations for a general improvement in the quality of governance.
Keywords:
sociocultural characteristics, Arctic region, Arctic, Arctic Karelia, Hofstede model, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity

Author Biographies

Alexander D. Volkov, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia
Candidate of Economics, Senior Researcher
Alexander O. Averianov, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS; Budget Monitoring Center of Petrozavodsk State University, Petrozavodsk, Russia
Junior Researcher, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Research Center RAS; Leading Specialist, Budget Monitoring Center of Petrozavodsk State University
Natalia A. Roslyakova, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS; V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Science RAS, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Economics, Senior Researcher
Anastasia V. Vasilieva, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia
Candidate of Economics, Senior Researcher

References

1. Aksenova O. V., Levchenko N. V., Pakhar A. M., Pisarevsky V. G., Podlesnaya M. A., Podyachev K. V., Ryazantsev I. P., Khaly I. A. Asimmetriya zhizni sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva: sootnoshenije traditsij i innovatij [Asymmetry of Life in Modern Russian Society: the Relationship between Traditions and Innovations]. Moscow. FNISTs RAN [FCTAS RAS]. 2017. 207 p. (in Russ.)

2. Latova N. V. Kul’turnaya spetsifika rossiyan (etnometricheskii analiz na osnove kontseptsii G. Khofsteda) [Cultural specificity of Russians (ethnometric analysis based on the concept of G. Hofstede)]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. 2016. No. 19. P. 155–179. (in Russ.)

3. Chimenson D., Tung R. L., Panibratov A., Fang T. The paradox and change of Russian cultural values. International Business Review. 2022. Vol. 31. Iss. 3. P. 101944. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101944

4. Minkov M., Sokolov B., Ponarin, E., Almakaeva A., Nastina, E. Is «regional culture» a meaningful concept? Cultural differences across 60 Russian regions. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. 2023. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 637–656. DOI: 10.1108/CCSM-07-2022-0126

5. Bakhtigaraeva A. I., Bryzgalin V. A., Nikishina E. N., Pripuzova N. A. Sotsiokul’turnyje osobennosti regionov Rossii: obshcheje i razlichiya [Sociocultural specifics of Russia’s regions: common features and differences]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika [Moscow University Economic Bulletin]. 2021. No. 5. P. 2951. DOI: 10.38050/01300105202152 (in Russ.)

6. Bryzgalin V. A., Nikishina Е. N. Sushchestvujet li regional’naya sotsiokul’turnaya spetsifika v Rossii? Vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya sotsiokul’turnogo podkhoda v ekonomike [Is there a regional culture in Russia? Opportunities of using a sociocultural approach in economics]. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues]. 2020. No. 7. P. 108126. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-7-108-126 (in Russ.)

7. Volkov A. D., Tishkov S. V., Averyanov A. O. Sotsiokul’turnyje osobennosti naseleniya arkticheskikh regionov Rossii [Socio-cultural features of the population of the Russian Arctic regions]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 52-65. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.2.5 (in Russ.)

8. Latova N. V. Proizvodstvennaya kul’tura rabochikh sovremennoj Rossii kak element ikh chelovecheskogo kapitala (etnometricheskij analiz na osnove kontseptsii G. Khofsteda) [The industrial culture of modern Russian workers as an element of their human capital: an ethnometric analysis using Hofstede’s model]. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia, Sociology. Ethnology.]. 2017. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 36–63. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2017-26-3-36-63 (in Russ.)

9. Auzan A. A., Nikishina E. N. Sotsiokul’turnaya ekonomika: kak kul’tura vliyaet na ekonomiku, a ekonomika — na kul’turu: kurs lektsij [Socio-Cultural Economics: How Culture Affects the Economy, and How the Economy Influences Culture. A course of lectures]. Moscow. MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova [Lomonosov Moscow State University]. 2021. 200 p. (in Russ.)

10. van Hoorn A. Cultural determinants of human capital accumulation: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2019. Vol. 47. Iss. 2. P. 429–440. DOI: 10.1016/j. jce.2019.01.004

11. Minkov M., Sokolov B., Tasse M. A., Jamballu, E., Schachner M., Kaasa A. A transposition of the Minkov-Hofstede model of culture to the individual level of analysis: evidence from Mongolia. Cross-Cultural Research. 2023. No. 57(2–3). P. 264–293. DOI:10.1177/10693971231153461

12. Yoo B., Donthu N., Lenartowicz T. Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2011. Vol. 23(3–4). P. 193–210. DOI: 10.1080/08961530.2011.578059

13. Khan O., Varaksina N., Hinterhuber A. The influence of cultural differences on consumers’ willingness to pay more for sustainable fashion. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024. Vol. 442. P. 141024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141024

14. Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and expanded. New York. McGraw-Hill. 2010. 561 p.

15. Heydari A., Laroche M., Paulin M., Richard M. O. Hofstede’s individual-level indulgence dimension: Scale development and validation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2021. Vol. 62. P. 102640. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102640

16. Volkov A. D., Averyanov A. O., Roslyakova N. A., Tishkov S. V. Izmerenije sotsiokul’turnykh kharakteristik po shesti pokazatelyam modeli Khofstede: aprobatsiya instrumentariya dlya raschota znachenij na individual’nom urovne [Measuring sociocultural characteristics according to the six indicators of the Hofstede model: testing the toolkit for calculating values at the individual level]. Vestnik instituta sotsiologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. 2024. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 43–69. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2024.15.1.4 (in Russ.)

17. Murzina J. S., Pozniakov V. P., Dyachkov S. M., Yazovskikh A. V. Sravnitel’nyj analiz tsennostnykh orientatsij vladel’tsev malogo biznesa s raznoj prodolzhitel’nost’yu raboty kompanij na rynke [Comparative study of the value orientations of small business owners with different durations of companies in the market]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational Psychology] 2021. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 9–35. (in Russ.)

18. Poznyakov V. P. Vzaimosvyaz’ smyslozhiznennykh i tsennostnykh orientatsij lichnosti predprinimatelej i kharakteristik ikh ekonomicheskogo samoopredeleniya [The relationship of life and value orientations of entrepreneurs and the characteristics of their economic self-determination]. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya [Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology]. 2021. Vol. 6. No. 1(21). P. 150–170. DOI: 10.38098/ipran.sep.2021.21.1.006 (in Russ.)
Article

Received: 13.02.2024

Accepted: 23.09.2024

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Volkov, A. D., Averianov, A. O., Roslyakova, N. A., & Vasilieva, A. V. (2024). Socio-cultural features of the population of the Arctic region and practices of human capital reproduction: is there a connection?. Population, 27(3), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-124-136
Section
CONDITIONS AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF POULATION