Labor productivity: features of differentiation of the socio-economic space of the Far Eastern macroregion

Research Article
How to Cite
Makar S.V., Yarasheva A.V. Labor productivity: features of differentiation of the socio-economic space of the Far Eastern macroregion. Population. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 193-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-193-205 (in Russ.).

Abstract

Sustainable economic growth and spatial development are extremely important for Russia at the present time in the context of external processes of turbulence and instability. Labor productivity is one of the key parameters of growth and development not only at the national level, but also at the subnational level. The need and possibility of raising it by increasing the human capital of Russian regions is obvious. The purpose of this article is to identify the features of differentiation of the socio-economic space of the Far Eastern macroregion (FEFD) based on The regional and sectoral differences in labor productivity, taking into account the parameters of human capital for the purpose of effective public administration in order to achieve national goals in accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 05/07. 2024 No. 309 — realization of human potential, advanced training of personnel for priority sectors of the economy, sustainable and dynamic economy. The information base for the study consisted of publications by mainly Russian scientists, statistical data and information and analytical sources. The authors used methodology of spatial analysis, methods — content analysis, statistical, comparative analysis, expert assessment and others. There were identified macroregional features and regional accents on the basis of studying the dynamics of regional labor productivity indicators in the Far Eastern macroregion for the period 2018–2022, including. by groups of economic activities. The source of increased labor productivity as a factor of economic and social development at all spatial levels, including macro- and meso-regional: human capital (the employed with higher education) is emphasized. The macro-regional core of the transformation of human potential into human capital is identified — Primorsky Krai. Application of the results obtained is advisable within the framework of public administration programs and projects concerning scientific and technological development of the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District, which is a geopolitical and geo-economic priority for Russia.
Keywords:
labor productivity, Far Eastern macroregion, differentiation of socio-economic space, education, human capital

Author Biographies

Svetlana V. Makar, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Doctor of Economics, Chief Researcher
Aziza V. Yarasheva, ISESP FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of laboratory

References

1. Basovskaya E. N., Basovsky L. E. Vliyanije oplaty truda i differentsiatsii dokhodov naseleniya na proizvoditel’nost’ truda v regionakh Rossii [The impact of labor remuneration and the differentiation of household income on labor productivity in the regions of Russia]. Nauchnyje issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ehkonomika [Scientific Research and Development. Economics]. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 4. Р.15– 18. DOI: 10.12737/article_5d53b2cd2ab7b5.00704502 (in Rus.)

2. Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Regional’nyje problemy zanyatosti naseleniya: zarplatnyje prityazaniya [Regional problems of employment: payroll claims]. Ehkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. [Economics, Taxes and Law]. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 94–106. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2018-11-3-94-106 (in Rus.)

3. Yarasheva A. V., Alexandrova O. A., Makar S. V. Rol’ reabilitatsionno-obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdenij v professional’noy podgotovke i trudoustroystve invalidov [The role of rehabilitation and educational institutions in vocational training and employment of people with disabilities]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2019. No. 3. P. 146–161. DOI: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00033 (in Rus.)

4. Voskoboinikov I. B., Gimpelson V. E. Rost proizvoditel’nosti truda, strukturnyje sdvigi i neformal’naya zanyatost’ v rossijskoj ehkonomike [Productivity growth, structural change and informality: the case of Russia]. Voprosy ehkonomiki [Economic Issues]. 2015. No. 11. P. 30–61. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-30-61 (in Rus.)

5. Zotikov N. Z. Rost proizvoditel’nosti truda kak uslovije povysheniya zarabotnoj platy [Increase in the labor productivity as a condition for raising wages]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics]. 2022. No. 6(212). P. 36–45. DOI: 10.46554/1993-0453-2022-6-212-36-45 (in Rus.)

6. Makar S. V. K razvitiyu metodologii prostranstvennogo analiza: kontseptsiya ogranichennoj prostranstvennoj polyarizatsii [Towards the development of spatial analysis methodology: the concept of limited spatial polarization]. Diskussiya [Discussion]. 2024. No. 3(124). P. 6–12. DOI: 10.46320/2077-7639-2024-3-124-6-12 (in Rus.)

7. Ekimova N. A. Faktory i rezervy rosta proizvoditel’nosti truda v Rossii: kontseptsii i kolichestvennyje otsenki [Factors and reserves of labor productivity growth in Russia: concepts and quantitative estimates]. Vestnik URFU. Seriya: Ehkonomika i upravlenije. [Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series: Economics and Management]. 2019. Vol. 18. No. 6. P. 944–966. (in Rus.)

8. Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Regional’nyje osobennosti natsional’nogo proekta «Zdravookhranenije»: potrebnost’ i dostupnost’ kvalifikatsionnogo rosta meditsinskikh rabotnikov [Regional features of the national project «Healthcare» implementation: the need and availability of qualification growth for medical professionals]. Ehkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. [Economics, Taxes and Law]. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 102–111. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2020-13-3-102-111 (in Rus.)

9. Makar S. V., Yarasheva A. V. Potrebitel’skoje povedenije rossiyan: vozmozhnosti i prioritety [Consumer behavior of Russians: opportunities and priorities]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2022. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 68–78. DOI: 10.19181/population.2022.25.4.6 (in Rus.)

10. Lokosov V. V., Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Prostranstvennoje raspredelenije chelovecheskikh resursov: sfery obrazovaniya i truda [Spatial distribution of human resources: education and labor spheres]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 4–13. DOI: 10.24412/1561-7785-2024-2-4-13 (in Rus.)

11. Makar S. V., Yarasheva A. V., Simagin Yu. A. Prostranstvennoje razvitije Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii: demograficheskije i sotsial’no-ehkonomicheskije faktory [Spatial development of the Russian Far East: demographic and socio-economic factors]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2021. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 117–130. DOI: 10.19181/population.2021.24.1.11 (in Rus.)

12. Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Vliyanije demograficheskikh faktorov na trudovoj potentsial regionov Dal’nego Vostoka [The impact of demographic factors on the labor potential of the Far East regions]. Ehkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. [Economics, Taxes and Law]. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 103–114. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2019-12-2-103-114 (in Rus.)

13. Shneiderman I. M., Yarasheva A. V., Makar S. V. Obespechennost’ zhil’yom zhitelej Dal’nego Vostoka: statisticheskij analiz [Provision of housing for residents of the Far East: statistical analysis]. Voprosy statistiki [Statistical Issues]. 2023. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 53–63. DOI: 10.34023/2313-6383-2023-30-3-53-63 (in Rus.)

14. Ryumina E. V. Kachestvennyje kharakteristiki naseleniya i sostoyanije ehkonomiki: analiz otdel’nykh grupp regionov Rossii [Qualitative characteristics of population and the state of the economy: analysis of certain groups of Russian regions]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 3. Р. 16–26. DOI: 10.19181/population.2020.23.3.2 (in Rus.)
Article

Received: 04.02.2024

Accepted: 25.09.2024

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Makar, S. V., & Yarasheva, A. V. (2024). Labor productivity: features of differentiation of the socio-economic space of the Far Eastern macroregion. Population, 27(3), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-193-205
Section
ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR OF POPULATION