Development of agritourism as a factor in diversification of regional economy: impact on the quality of life of rural population

Research Article
How to Cite
Dmitrieva O.A., Morkovkin D.E., Simagin Y.A., Polyakov A.E. Development of agritourism as a factor in diversification of regional economy: impact on the quality of life of rural population. Population. 2025. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 190-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2025-1-190-203 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the growing interest in rural tourism, caused by the high level of urbanization and the need for outdoor recreation, as well as its multiplier impact on both the economy and the socio-cultural sphere of the village. The article explores agritourism as a mechanism for diversifying the regional economy and its role in the socio-economic development of rural areas in order to improve the quality of life of rural population. In Russian agriculture, there are a number of social problems that are extremely acute and require primary attention, in particular, the problems of rural employment, health, education, and leisure. Solution of these problems will contribute to a social upsurge of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The authors analyze the current state and prospects for development of agritourism in Russia, highlighting a significant gap between its potential and implementation in comparison with the experience of European countries, where it is one of the priority areas. Scientific theoretical approaches to identifying the role of agricultural tourism and its impact on sustainable regional development are also investigated. The article analyzed the multiplicative impact of agritourism on the countryside. It manifests itself through stimulating economic activity, strengthening social ties and cultural heritage, as well as through promotion of environmentally sustainable practices in rural areas. The authors note that for a sustainable growth of the regional agritourism, effective interaction of institutional structures with the development trends of this area is necessary. The article analyzes the impact of the components of the institutional structure on the effectiveness of the development of agritourism.
Keywords:
quality of life, agricultural tourism, rural population, economic diversification, sustainable development of rural territories, institutional impact, national projects

Author Biographies

Olga A. Dmitrieva, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor
Dmitry E. Morkovkin, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor
Yury A. Simagin, ISESP FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Geography, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher
Anton E. Polyakov, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor

References

1. Oborin M.S. Ustoychivoye razvitiye agrarnogo turizma na osnove ispol’zovaniya potentsiala sel’skikh territoriy [Sustainable development of agricultural tourism based on the use of the potential of rural areas]. Servis plus [Service plus]. 2018. Vol. 12. No. 1. Р. 43–52. DOI: 10.24411/2413-693X-2018-10205 (in Russ.)

2. Vlasov A.V., Galushkin A.A., Dianova V. Yu., et al. Sovremennyye problemy regional’noy ekonomicheskoy integratsii (na primere Yevropeyskogo soyuza i Yevraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza) [Modern Problems of Regional Economic Integration. (On the Example of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union)]. Moscow. KnoRus. 2019. 268 p. (in Russ.)

3. Ivanova N.A. Metodologicheskiye osnovy strategicheskogo razvitiya regional’noy ekonomicheskoy sistemy [Methodological foundations of the strategic development of the regional economic system]. Upravleniye i ekonomika: issledovaniya i razrabotki [Management and Economics: Research and Development]. Penza. Penza State Agrarian University. 2021. Р. 52–64. (in Russ.)

4. Parker C., Scott S., Geddes A. Snowball Sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. Available at: core.ac.uk›download/pdf/211022791.pdf (Accessed: 8 November 2024).

5. Lak A., Khairabadi O. Leveraging agritourism in rural areas in developing countries: The case of Iran. [Frontiers in Sustainable Cities]. 2022. Vol. 4. DOI: 10.3389/frsc.2022.863385

6. Evgrafova L.V. Metodologicheskiye podkhody k otsenke mul’tiplikativnogo effekta turizma v ekonomike [Methodological approaches to assessing the multiplicative effect of tourism in the economy]. Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom [Service in Russia and Abroad]. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 5. P. 11–20. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7393825 (in Russ.)

7. Veljkovic V., Brocic Z. Agritourism and rural development. Tourism in Function of Development of the Republic of Serbia. 2017. P. 480–499.

8. Dmitrieva O.A., Ferafontova M.V., Shumaev V.A. Ekonomicheskiye aspekty razvitiya agroturizma: opyt Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran [Economic aspects of agritourism development: experience of Russia and foreign countries]. Yevraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Eurasian Law Journal]. 2015. No. 12(91). P. 314–315. (in Russ.)

9. Shumaev V.A., Morkovkin D.E., Yurzinova L.L., et al. Innovative aspects of agritourism project management. Financial and Economic Tools Used in the World Hospitality Industry: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Management and Technology in Knowledge, Service, Tourism and Hospitality (Bali, October 21–22, 2017). Bali. CRC Press. 2018. P. 241–248.

10. Guluzade S.B. The role of sustainable tourism in the development of the regional economy. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy. 2023. No. 3(43). DOI: 10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30092023/8020
Article

Received: 27.10.2024

Accepted: 31.03.2025

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Dmitrieva, O. A., Morkovkin, D. E., Simagin, Y. A., & Polyakov, A. E. (2025). Development of agritourism as a factor in diversification of regional economy: impact on the quality of life of rural population. Population, 28(1), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2025-1-190-203
Section
QUALITY AND CONDITIONS OF LIFE OF POPULATION