Institute of family as a factor of forming trust in modern economic relations
Research Article
Acknowledgments
The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budget funds under the state assignment to the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation.
How to Cite
Frolova E.V., Tyurikov A.G. Institute of family as a factor of forming trust in modern economic relations. Population. 2025. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 204-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2025-1-204-214 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The institution of family represents the primary environment for formation of economic knowledge and values of young people, development of their financial culture. The transmission of family experience in the field of investment, savings, financial management, and a positive attitude towards entrepreneurship provides value and semantic content to the process of forming and developing trust in economic relations. The research results demonstrate the contradiction between the recognition of the family as a priority in the value system of Russians and the decrease in its functional significance in the process of socialization of young people and formation of trust. Based on the analysis of scientific publications and research results, the article identifies the factors that initiate the crisis of the family institution, the narrowing of the boundaries of its influence on the economic behavior patterns of young people, and the decline in trust. These factors include the following: dominance of the values of the consumer society, erosion of the culture of family relations, breaks in intergenerational ties in the family, deinstitutionalization of «home care» in the person of grandparents, loss and / or seizure of financial assets of families during the years of reforms and political upheavals, consolidated in the historical memory of Russian generations. These destructions cause a devaluation of the values of saving behavior, formation of a deficit of trust in the economy, an increase in credit debt, and a decrease in the motivation of entrepreneurship. The results of the expert survey show that assessments of the values and meanings of family as a mechanism for reproduction of trust in the economy are centered in the low range (2.84 points out of 5). The details of the experts’ answers illustrate the following distributions of assessments: in the field of savings (4.5 points), in the field of labor relations (3.0), in business and entrepreneurship (3.63), in the financial sphere (2.8). The article concludes that it is necessary to popularize successful family traditions of saving and investment behavior, implementation of entrepreneurial initiatives and accumulation of family capital.
Keywords:
trust, family, reproduction of trust, economic relations, saving behavior, entrepreneurship
References
1. Veselov Yu. V., Skvortsov N.G. Transformatsiya kul’tury doveriya v Rossii [Transformation of the culture of trust in Russia]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskije i sotsial’nyje peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. 2023. No. 1. P. 157–179. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2023.1.2212 (in Russ.)
2. Antonyuk V.P., Ivanova Ya. S., Kuleshov S.M., Morozova A.S. Defitsit doveriya v transformiruyushchihsya sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniyakh: ustranyat’ ili narashchivat’ [The deficit of trust in the transforming modern economic relations: to eliminate or increase]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnyje znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. 2023. No. 9. P. 19–25. (in Russ.)
3. Frolova E.V., Rogach O.V. Institutsional’noje doverije v rossijskikh regionakh [Institutional trust within Russian regions]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science]. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 49–58. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2022-2-49-58 (in Russ.)
4. Vlasova A.V., Tyurikov A.G., Dronova A.S., et al. Fenomen doveriya v otechestvennom nauchnom diskurse [The phenomenon of trust in domestic scientific discourse]. Gumanitarnyje nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta [Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University]. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 5. P. 70–78. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-5-70-78 (in Russ.)
5. Bourdieu P. Formy kapitala [Forms of Capital]. Ekonomicheskaja sotsiologija [Journal of Economic Sociology]. 2002. Vol. 3. No. 5. P. 60–74. (in Russ.)
6. Coleman J. Kapital sotsial’nyj i chelovecheskij [Social and human capital]. Obshhestvennyje nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. 2001. No. 3. P. 12–139. (in Russ.)
7. Sztompka P. Sotsiologiya: Analiz sovremennogo obshchestva [Sociology: Analysis of Modern Society]. Trans. from Polish by S.M. Chervonna. Moscow. Logos. 2005. (in Russ.)
8. Bekirova S.E. Povyshenije effektivnosti upravleniya lichnymi finansami na etapakh zhiznennogo tsikla sem’i [Improving the efficiency of personal finance management at the stages of the family life cycle]. Nauchnyj vestnik: finansy, banki, investitsii [Scientific Bulletin: Finance, Banks, Investments]. 2019. No. 1(46). P. 25–32. (in Russ.)
9. Efanova O.A., Pisklakova-Parker M.P. Sovremennaya rossijskaya sem’ya v usloviyah izmeneniya gendernykh otnoshenij [Modern Russian family under the conditions of changing gender relations]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 26–36. DOI: 10.19181/population.2020.23.2.3 (in Russ.)
10. Tsareva N.A. Krizis doveriya v sem’e kak otrazhenije krizisa v obshchestve [A crisis of confidence in the family as a reflection of crisis in society]. Lichnost’ v ekstremal’nykh usloviyakh i krizisnykh situatsiyakh zhiznedeyatel’nosti [Personality in Extreme Conditions and Crisis Situations of Life]. 2015. No. 5. P. 136–141. (in Russ.)
11. Belonovskaya A.M., Balandina N.G., Zbirovskaya E.P. Institutsional’noje doverije kak faktor finansovogo blagopoluchiya domohozyajstv: mezhdunarodnyje i natsional’nyje aspekty [Institutional trust as a factor in the financial well-being of households: international and national aspects]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2015. No. 12. P. 244–248. (in Russ.)
12. Gurdzhiyan M.V. Krizis sem’i v sovremennoj Rossii i puti yego preodoleniya [The family crisis in modern Russia and ways to overcome it]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture]. 2017. No. 1. P. 59–62. (in Russ.)
13. Smagina M.V. Sotsiokul’turnaya transformatsiya sem’i v sovremennoj Rossii kak faktor neblagopoluchiya [Sociocultural transformation of the family in modern Russia as a factor of disadvantage]. Ekonomicheskije i gumanitarnyje issledovaniya regionov [Economic and Humanitarian Studies of Regions]. 2016. No. 2. P. 110–114. (in Russ.)
14. Dobrohleb V.G., Ballaeva E.A. Sem’ya pered litsom novykh sotsial’nykh vyzovov [Family in the face of new social challenges]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2018. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 60–68. DOI: 10.26653/1561-7785-2018-21-2-05 (in Russ.)
15. Ustinova O.V., Pivovarova I.V. Preodolenije krizisa instituta sem’i v Rossii [Overcoming the the family institution crisis in Russia]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika [News from Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics]. 2014. No. 1. P. 78–82. (in Russ.)
16. Natsak O.D. Finansovo-ekonomicheskije strategii tuvinskikh semej (po materialam sotsiologicheskikh issledovanij) [Financial and economic strategies of Tuvan families (on the materials of sociological research)]. Vlast’ [The Authority]. 2022. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 180–190. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i1.8803 (in Russ.)
17. Pavlov B.S. Sberezhenije sotsial’nogo instituta roditel’skoj sem’i kak zalog vosproizvodstva demograficheskogo blagopoluchiya regional’nogo sotsiuma (teoreticheskije posyly i praktika analiza (1971–2021 gg.)) [Saving the social institute of the parental family as a key to demographic well-being reproduction in regional communities (theoretical background and practical analysis (1971– 2021))]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskije nauki [PNRP Sociology and Economics Bulletin]. 2021. No. 3. P. 62–81. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.3.5 (in Russ.)
18. Kruglova E.L. Ekonomicheskije stereotipy rossijskikh semej cherez prizmu poslovits i pogovorok [Economic stereotypes of Russian families through the prism of proverbs and sayings]. Sotsiodinamika [Sociodynamics]. 2023. No. 7. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2023.7.43831 (in Russ.)
19. Alekseev M.S. Doverije naseleniya k organam vlasti v informatsionnom obshchestve: teoretiko-metodologicheskije osnovy izucheniya [Public trust in the authorities in the information society: theoretical and methodological bases of studying]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science]. 2023. No. 71. P. 177–191. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/71/17 (in Russ.)
20. Vereshchagina A.V., Gafiatulina N.H., Samygin S.I. Sem’ya v formirovanii tsennosti doveriya v molod’ozhnoj srede sovremennogo rossijskogo goroda [Family in the formation of the value of trust among the youth of a modern Russian city]. Inzhenernyj vestnik Dona [Engineering Bulletin of the Don]. 2016. No. 2(41). P. 25. (in Russ.)
21. Khagurova N.E. Sovremennaya sem’ya i vospitanije: fenomenologiya krizisa [Modern family and education: phenomenology of crisis]. Narodnoje obrazovanije [Public Education]. 2013. No. 7. P. 207–213. (in Russ.)
2. Antonyuk V.P., Ivanova Ya. S., Kuleshov S.M., Morozova A.S. Defitsit doveriya v transformiruyushchihsya sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniyakh: ustranyat’ ili narashchivat’ [The deficit of trust in the transforming modern economic relations: to eliminate or increase]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnyje znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. 2023. No. 9. P. 19–25. (in Russ.)
3. Frolova E.V., Rogach O.V. Institutsional’noje doverije v rossijskikh regionakh [Institutional trust within Russian regions]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science]. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 49–58. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2022-2-49-58 (in Russ.)
4. Vlasova A.V., Tyurikov A.G., Dronova A.S., et al. Fenomen doveriya v otechestvennom nauchnom diskurse [The phenomenon of trust in domestic scientific discourse]. Gumanitarnyje nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta [Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University]. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 5. P. 70–78. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-5-70-78 (in Russ.)
5. Bourdieu P. Formy kapitala [Forms of Capital]. Ekonomicheskaja sotsiologija [Journal of Economic Sociology]. 2002. Vol. 3. No. 5. P. 60–74. (in Russ.)
6. Coleman J. Kapital sotsial’nyj i chelovecheskij [Social and human capital]. Obshhestvennyje nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. 2001. No. 3. P. 12–139. (in Russ.)
7. Sztompka P. Sotsiologiya: Analiz sovremennogo obshchestva [Sociology: Analysis of Modern Society]. Trans. from Polish by S.M. Chervonna. Moscow. Logos. 2005. (in Russ.)
8. Bekirova S.E. Povyshenije effektivnosti upravleniya lichnymi finansami na etapakh zhiznennogo tsikla sem’i [Improving the efficiency of personal finance management at the stages of the family life cycle]. Nauchnyj vestnik: finansy, banki, investitsii [Scientific Bulletin: Finance, Banks, Investments]. 2019. No. 1(46). P. 25–32. (in Russ.)
9. Efanova O.A., Pisklakova-Parker M.P. Sovremennaya rossijskaya sem’ya v usloviyah izmeneniya gendernykh otnoshenij [Modern Russian family under the conditions of changing gender relations]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 26–36. DOI: 10.19181/population.2020.23.2.3 (in Russ.)
10. Tsareva N.A. Krizis doveriya v sem’e kak otrazhenije krizisa v obshchestve [A crisis of confidence in the family as a reflection of crisis in society]. Lichnost’ v ekstremal’nykh usloviyakh i krizisnykh situatsiyakh zhiznedeyatel’nosti [Personality in Extreme Conditions and Crisis Situations of Life]. 2015. No. 5. P. 136–141. (in Russ.)
11. Belonovskaya A.M., Balandina N.G., Zbirovskaya E.P. Institutsional’noje doverije kak faktor finansovogo blagopoluchiya domohozyajstv: mezhdunarodnyje i natsional’nyje aspekty [Institutional trust as a factor in the financial well-being of households: international and national aspects]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2015. No. 12. P. 244–248. (in Russ.)
12. Gurdzhiyan M.V. Krizis sem’i v sovremennoj Rossii i puti yego preodoleniya [The family crisis in modern Russia and ways to overcome it]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture]. 2017. No. 1. P. 59–62. (in Russ.)
13. Smagina M.V. Sotsiokul’turnaya transformatsiya sem’i v sovremennoj Rossii kak faktor neblagopoluchiya [Sociocultural transformation of the family in modern Russia as a factor of disadvantage]. Ekonomicheskije i gumanitarnyje issledovaniya regionov [Economic and Humanitarian Studies of Regions]. 2016. No. 2. P. 110–114. (in Russ.)
14. Dobrohleb V.G., Ballaeva E.A. Sem’ya pered litsom novykh sotsial’nykh vyzovov [Family in the face of new social challenges]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2018. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 60–68. DOI: 10.26653/1561-7785-2018-21-2-05 (in Russ.)
15. Ustinova O.V., Pivovarova I.V. Preodolenije krizisa instituta sem’i v Rossii [Overcoming the the family institution crisis in Russia]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika [News from Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics]. 2014. No. 1. P. 78–82. (in Russ.)
16. Natsak O.D. Finansovo-ekonomicheskije strategii tuvinskikh semej (po materialam sotsiologicheskikh issledovanij) [Financial and economic strategies of Tuvan families (on the materials of sociological research)]. Vlast’ [The Authority]. 2022. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 180–190. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i1.8803 (in Russ.)
17. Pavlov B.S. Sberezhenije sotsial’nogo instituta roditel’skoj sem’i kak zalog vosproizvodstva demograficheskogo blagopoluchiya regional’nogo sotsiuma (teoreticheskije posyly i praktika analiza (1971–2021 gg.)) [Saving the social institute of the parental family as a key to demographic well-being reproduction in regional communities (theoretical background and practical analysis (1971– 2021))]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskije nauki [PNRP Sociology and Economics Bulletin]. 2021. No. 3. P. 62–81. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.3.5 (in Russ.)
18. Kruglova E.L. Ekonomicheskije stereotipy rossijskikh semej cherez prizmu poslovits i pogovorok [Economic stereotypes of Russian families through the prism of proverbs and sayings]. Sotsiodinamika [Sociodynamics]. 2023. No. 7. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2023.7.43831 (in Russ.)
19. Alekseev M.S. Doverije naseleniya k organam vlasti v informatsionnom obshchestve: teoretiko-metodologicheskije osnovy izucheniya [Public trust in the authorities in the information society: theoretical and methodological bases of studying]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science]. 2023. No. 71. P. 177–191. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/71/17 (in Russ.)
20. Vereshchagina A.V., Gafiatulina N.H., Samygin S.I. Sem’ya v formirovanii tsennosti doveriya v molod’ozhnoj srede sovremennogo rossijskogo goroda [Family in the formation of the value of trust among the youth of a modern Russian city]. Inzhenernyj vestnik Dona [Engineering Bulletin of the Don]. 2016. No. 2(41). P. 25. (in Russ.)
21. Khagurova N.E. Sovremennaya sem’ya i vospitanije: fenomenologiya krizisa [Modern family and education: phenomenology of crisis]. Narodnoje obrazovanije [Public Education]. 2013. No. 7. P. 207–213. (in Russ.)
Article
Received: 25.06.2024
Accepted: 31.03.2025
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Frolova, E. V., & Tyurikov, A. G. (2025). Institute of family as a factor of forming trust in modern economic relations. Population, 28(1), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2025-1-204-214
Section
QUALITY AND CONDITIONS OF LIFE OF POPULATION
