Семейные ценности как цель в жизни для законных супругов и сожителей
Acknowledgments
RFBRproject No. 18-011-01037.
How to Cite
Sinelnikov A.B. Семейные ценности как цель в жизни для законных супругов и сожителей. Population. 2018. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 46-59. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article is devoted to analysis of the data from sociological studies conducted by the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation (Rosstat). The author divides all respondents into three groups: [1] legally married; [2] cohabitants, i.e. «unmarried couples»; [3] single men and women who have neither legal spouses nor cohabitants. The research results show that cohabitants are much less likely than legal spouses to consider formation (or preservation) of a «good family» as an important purpose in their lives. They are in intermediate position between single and married by the degree of importance of this life purpose for them. However, this intermediate position depends on the sex of the respondents and on their having or not having children. Childless female cohabitants attach almost the same importance to a good family as married women, who also have no children. Both of these groups are very similar to each other and very different from single women who do not have children. The author concludes that the majority of childless women in «unmarried couples» consider cohabitation and postponement of the birth of children as a test for the possibility of forming a good family with this partner. The goal of these women is legal marriage and birth of children. However, over half of their partners do not set themselves such goals. They are more close to single men than to the married men who have no children. Therefore, not all unmarried couples without children eventually turn into married couples with children.
Keywords:
legal marriage, divorce, cohabitation, men, women, children, good family, married, cohabitant, single
References
Isupova O.G. We are just living together. Demoskop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly]. No. 565-566. 2-15 September 2013. Available at: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0565/ tema01.php. (Accessed: 1 April 2018). (in Russ.)
Naseleniye Rossii 2008. Shestnadtsatyy yezhegodnyy demograficheskiy doklad [Population of Russia 2008. Sixteenth annual demographic report]. Ed. A. G. Vishnevsky. Moscow. Izd. dom gos. un-ta — Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Higher School of Economics]. 2010. 352 P. (in Russ.)
Vishnevsky A. Demographic revolution is changing the reproductive strategies of homo sapiens. Demograficheskoye obozreniye [Demographic Review]. 2014. № 1. P. 6-33. Avail-able at: https://demreview.hse.ru/data/2014/07/16/1319120882/DemRev_1-_2014.pdf (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.).
Gurko T.A., Orlova N. A. Development of personality of adolescents in different types of family. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2011. No. 10. P. 99-108. (in Russ.)
R. Lesthaeghe, J. Surkyn. Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Rostock. 17 April 2004. Special Collection 3. No. 3. P. 45-86.
Van de Kaa D. J. Demographic transitions.. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Ed. Yi. Zeng. Demography. Vol.1. 2010. Oxford. Eolss Publishers. P. 65-103.
Van de Kaa D. J. Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin. 1987. No. 42 (1). P. 1-59.
Shpakovskaya L. L. Policy of institutionalization and practice of privatization of family life: partnership and marriage in Russia. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial'noy politiki [Journal of So-cial Policy Studies]. 2012. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 309-322. (in Russ.)
Zakharov S. V., Churilova E. V., Agadjanian V. Fertility in higher-order marital unions in Russia: Does a new partnership give a possibility for realization of the two-child ideal? De-mograficheskoye obozreniye [Demographic Review]. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 35-51. Available at: https://demreview.hse.ru/data/2016/07/04/1116624361/DemRev_3_1_2016_35-51.pdf. (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Influence of the origin from a single-parent family on a chance to create and salve two-parent family. Determinatsiya demograficheskikh protsessov [Determination of Demographic Processes]. Demograficheskiye issledovaniya. [Population Research]. Issue 21. Eds. N.V. Zvereva and B. N. Arkhangelsky. Moscow. 2012. P. 168-184. (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Divors for subjective reasons: Survey data. Vestnik Moskovskogo univer-siteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya. [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18: Sociol-ogy and Political Science]. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 3. P. 116-139. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-3 (Accessed: 20 March 2018). (in Russ.)
Shevchenko I.O. Stepfather in the structure of modern Russian family. Sotsiologiya [Sociol-ogy]. 2011. No. 2. P. 186-192. (in Russ.)
Naseleniye Rossii 2013: dvadtsat' pervyy yezhegodnyy demograficheskiy doklad [Popula-tion of Russia 2013. Twenty first annual demographic report]. Ed. S. V. Zakharov. Moscow. Higher School of Economics. 2015. P.75-77. (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Is there an alternative to legal marriage? Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18: Sociology and Political Science]. 2016. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 125-147. Available at: http://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/ jour/article/view/202/196 (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Family and marriage: Crisis or modernization?. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 95-113. Available at: http://jour.isras.ru/index.php/socjour/article/view/5715 (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.)
Naseleniye Rossii 2008. Shestnadtsatyy yezhegodnyy demograficheskiy doklad [Population of Russia 2008. Sixteenth annual demographic report]. Ed. A. G. Vishnevsky. Moscow. Izd. dom gos. un-ta — Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Higher School of Economics]. 2010. 352 P. (in Russ.)
Vishnevsky A. Demographic revolution is changing the reproductive strategies of homo sapiens. Demograficheskoye obozreniye [Demographic Review]. 2014. № 1. P. 6-33. Avail-able at: https://demreview.hse.ru/data/2014/07/16/1319120882/DemRev_1-_2014.pdf (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.).
Gurko T.A., Orlova N. A. Development of personality of adolescents in different types of family. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2011. No. 10. P. 99-108. (in Russ.)
R. Lesthaeghe, J. Surkyn. Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Rostock. 17 April 2004. Special Collection 3. No. 3. P. 45-86.
Van de Kaa D. J. Demographic transitions.. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Ed. Yi. Zeng. Demography. Vol.1. 2010. Oxford. Eolss Publishers. P. 65-103.
Van de Kaa D. J. Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin. 1987. No. 42 (1). P. 1-59.
Shpakovskaya L. L. Policy of institutionalization and practice of privatization of family life: partnership and marriage in Russia. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial'noy politiki [Journal of So-cial Policy Studies]. 2012. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 309-322. (in Russ.)
Zakharov S. V., Churilova E. V., Agadjanian V. Fertility in higher-order marital unions in Russia: Does a new partnership give a possibility for realization of the two-child ideal? De-mograficheskoye obozreniye [Demographic Review]. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 35-51. Available at: https://demreview.hse.ru/data/2016/07/04/1116624361/DemRev_3_1_2016_35-51.pdf. (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Influence of the origin from a single-parent family on a chance to create and salve two-parent family. Determinatsiya demograficheskikh protsessov [Determination of Demographic Processes]. Demograficheskiye issledovaniya. [Population Research]. Issue 21. Eds. N.V. Zvereva and B. N. Arkhangelsky. Moscow. 2012. P. 168-184. (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Divors for subjective reasons: Survey data. Vestnik Moskovskogo univer-siteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya. [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18: Sociol-ogy and Political Science]. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 3. P. 116-139. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-3 (Accessed: 20 March 2018). (in Russ.)
Shevchenko I.O. Stepfather in the structure of modern Russian family. Sotsiologiya [Sociol-ogy]. 2011. No. 2. P. 186-192. (in Russ.)
Naseleniye Rossii 2013: dvadtsat' pervyy yezhegodnyy demograficheskiy doklad [Popula-tion of Russia 2013. Twenty first annual demographic report]. Ed. S. V. Zakharov. Moscow. Higher School of Economics. 2015. P.75-77. (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Is there an alternative to legal marriage? Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18: Sociology and Political Science]. 2016. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 125-147. Available at: http://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/ jour/article/view/202/196 (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.)
Sinelnikov A.B. Family and marriage: Crisis or modernization?. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 95-113. Available at: http://jour.isras.ru/index.php/socjour/article/view/5715 (Accessed: 2 April 2018). (in Russ.)
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Sinelnikov, A. B. (2018). Семейные ценности как цель в жизни для законных супругов и сожителей. Population, 21(2), 46-59. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/population/article/view/6513
Section
WOMAN, MAN, FAMILY
