Threshold of old age: objective signs and subjective perception

Research Article
How to Cite
Antonov A.I., Nazarova I.B., Karpova V.M., Lyalikova S.V. Threshold of old age: objective signs and subjective perception. Population. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 131-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.3.11 (in Russ.).

Abstract

Population aging is a demographic trend characteristic of most world countries, it requires attention from various social institutions. The situation of the growing number of older people around the world increases the relevance of studying this issue. The article aggregates data from different sources that determine the boundaries of the onset of old age based on various theoretical and methodological approaches. It also shows the proportion of old people in the demographic structure of the Russian population in accordance with the chosen approaches. It is shown that the most popular age of the onset of old age, reflected in theoretical concepts, is within the range of 60–65 years. The article presents the results of the authors’ study, which covered 1198 respondents from more than 65 regions of the Russian Federation (organized by Lomonosov Moscow State University together with ISESP FCTAS RAS in 2022). During the analysis of the data obtained, some inconsistencies were found between the boundaries fixed in scientific discourse and the ideas of the study participants about the moment of the onset of old age. The results obtained showed the absence of significant differences in ideas about the moment of old age for men and women (69.4 and 68.0 years, respectively). There is a tendency to postpone the age of old age with an increase in the age of respondent. A correlation between the actual and psychological age of old age showed that “premature” aging (when a person recognizes himself as old, before he exceeds the age of old age he named) is found in more than half of the respondents who associate themselves with older people.
Keywords:
population aging, old age, age limits of old age, age structure of the population, elderly people

Author Biographies

Anatoly I. Antonov, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Doctor of Philosophy, Head of Department
Inna B. Nazarova, ISESP FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Doctor of Economics, Chief Researcher
Vera M. Karpova, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Sociology, Senior Lecturer
Sofia V. Lyalikova, ISESP FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Researcher

References

1. Dobrokhleb V. G. Demograficheskoye stareniye v Rossii i novaya sotsial’naya real’nost’ [Demographic aging in Russia and new social reality]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2022. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 66–76. DOI: 10.19181/population.2022.25.2.6 (in Russ.)

2. Erzin A. I., Gerashchenko N. A. Obraz blagopoluchnoj starosti v predstavlenii studentov [The image of a prosperous old age in the minds of students]. Psiholog [Psychologist]. 2015. No. 5. P. 76–95. DOI: 10.7256/2409–8701.2015.5.16173 (in Russ.)

3. Romanycheva I. S. Sotsial’nyje stereotipy v otnoshenii pozhilyh: protivorechiya i tendentsii [Social stereotypes in relation to the elderly: contradictions and trends]. Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk [Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences]. 2013. No. 1. P. 64–68. (in Russ.)

4. Smirnova T. V. Pozhilye lyudi: stereotipnyj obraz i sotsial’naya distantsiya [Elderly people: stereotypical image and social distance]. Sotsiologicheskije issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2008. No. 8. P. 49–55. (in Russ.)

5. Laslett P. What is old age? Variation over time and between cultures. Health and Mortality Among Elderly Populations. Eds. G. Caselli, A. Lopez. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. P. 21–38.

6. Barsukov V. N., Kalachikova O. N. Evolyutsiya demograficheskogo i sotsial’nogo konstruirovaniya vozrasta «starosti» [The evolution of demographic and social construction of the age of «old age»]. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. 2020. Vol.13. No.1. P. 34–50. DOI:10.15838/ecc.2020.1.67.2 (in Russ.)

7. Medkov V. M. Demografiya [Demography]. Moscow. Infra-M. 2007. 683 p. (in Russ.)

8. Rosset E. Protsess stareniya naseleniya [The Process of Population Aging]. Moscow. Statistika [Statistics]. 1968. 508 p. (in Russ.)

9. Rogozin D. M. Pyat’ knig o liberalizatsii stareniya [Five books on liberalization of aging]. Psihologiya zrelosti i stareniya [Psychology of Maturity and Aging]. 2012. No. 4. P. 59–66. (in Russ.)

10. Vincent J. Old Age. New York. Routledge. 2003. 208 p.

11. Kozlova N. D., Zhdanova S. Yu., Otnoshenije k stareniyu u pedagogov v svyazi s sotsial’no-psihologicheskimi harakteristikami lichnosti [Attitude to aging among teachers in connection with the social and psychological characteristics of the individual]. Psiholog [Psychologist]. 2020. No. 4. P. 20–22. DOI: 10.25136/2409–8701.2020.4.3278 (in Russ.)

12. Smirnova T. V. O professional’nyh destruktsiyah v pozhilom vozraste [On professional destruction in old age]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2007. No. 5(277). P. 21–28. (in Russ.)

13. Rijs K. J., Cozijnsen R., Deeg D. J. The effect of retirement and age at retirement on self-perceived health after three years of follow-up in Dutch 55–64 year olds. Aging and Society. 2012. Vol. 32. No. 2. P. 281–306.

14. Grigorieva I. A., Sizova I. L. Trajektorii stareniya zhenshchin v sovremennoj Rossii [Aging trajectories of women in modern Russia]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. 2018. No. 2. DOI: 10.17323/1811–038X-2018–27–2–109–135 (in Russ.)
Article

Received: 27.03.2023

Accepted: 12.09.2023

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Antonov, A. I., Nazarova, I. B., Karpova, V. M., & Lyalikova, S. V. (2023). Threshold of old age: objective signs and subjective perception. Population, 26(3), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.3.11
Section
ISSUES OF SOCIAL AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS