Family potential as a component of the human potential of Russian regions
Research Article
How to Cite
Dobrokhleb V.G., Efanova O.A. Family potential as a component of the human potential of Russian regions. Population. 2023. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 99-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.4.9 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to present family potential as a structural component of human potential with the core of family potential consisting of marriages, primarily registered. In the period between the All–Russian censuses of 2002, 2010, 2020 there was a decrease in the number of married people in the country: the number of married people decreased in 2020 as compared to 2002 by 7839 thousand people (12.6%). The proportion of married men decreased by 11.8%, among women the decrease was 11.4%. The largest decrease occurred between the censuses of 2010 and 2020: – 9.9% for male cohorts and – 9.5% for female cohorts. Approaches to analysis of human potential usually do not include the indicators that form family potential, or reduce it only to reproductive function. At the same time, formation of families, their number and quality is of fundamental importance when considering human potential, as it reflects the state of social solidarity, which is formed also in families. The article analyzes the indicators of marriage and divorce in the regions of the Russian Federation, presents the factors affecting them, and gives the author’s definition of family potential. It is shown that the social policy in the Russian Federation is mainly related to measures to increase the birth rate, which, apart from the impact on the sphere of family and marriage relations, does not bring positive results. At the same time, the most important task is formation of social values aimed at increasing strong families based on the values of matrimony.
Keywords:
human potential, family potential, marriage, divorce, social values, registered marriage, unregistered marital union
References
1. Bychenko D. Yu. Metodologicheskije osnovy issledovaniya chelovecheskogo potentsiala [Methodological foundations for study of human potential] Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology]. 2011. No. 2. P. 56–60. DOI: 10.18500/1818–9601–2011–11–2–56–60 (in Russ.)
2. Genisaretsky O. I., Nosov N. A., Yudin B. G. Kontseptsiya chelovecheskogo potentsiala: osnovnyje polozheniya [The concept of human potential: basic provisions]. Chelovecheskiy potentsial: opyt kompleksnogo podkhoda [Human Potential: Experience of an Integrated Aproach]. Ed. I. T. Frolov. Editorial URSS. Moscow. 1999. 176 p. (in Russ.)
3. Sen A. Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning. 1989. No. 19. P. 41–58.
4. Rimashevskaya N. M. Chelovecheskij potentsial Rossii: vzglyad v 21 vek [Russia’s human potential: a look into the 21st century]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 1999. No. 1. P. 9–19. (in Russ.)
5. Rimashevskaya N. M. Kachestvennyj potentsial naseleniya Rossii: vzglyad v 21 vek [Qualitative potential of the population of Russia: a look into the 21st century]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development]. 2001. No. 3. P. 34–48. (in Russ.)
6. Rimashevskaya N. M. Kachestvo chelovecheskogo potentsiala v sovremennoj Rossii [Quality of human potential in today’s Russia]. Bezopasnost’ Evrasii [Eurasia Security]. 2004. No. 1. P. 21–37. (in Russ.)
7. Rimashevskaya N. M. Chelovecheskij potentsial Rossii i problemy «sberezheniya naseleniya» [The human potential of Russia and the problems of «saving the population»]. Rossijskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal [Russian Economic Journal]. 2004. No. 9–10. P. 22–40. (in Russ.)
8. Zhenshchiny, muzhchiny, sem’ya v Rossii: poslednyaya tret’ 20 veka. Proekt «Taganrog» [Woman, Man, Family in Russia: the Last Third of the 21st Century. Project «Taganrog»]. Ed. N. M. Rimashevskaya. ISEPN RAN [ISESP RAS]. Moscow. 2001. 320 p. (in Russ.)
9. Rimashevskaya N. M. Chelovek i reformy: sekrety vyzhivaniya [Person and Reforms: The Secrets of Survival]. ISEPN RAN [ISESP RAS]. Moscow. 2003. 392 p. (in Russ.)
10. Zaslavskaya, T. I. Chelovecheskij potentsial v sovremennom transformatsionnom protsesse [Human potential in contemporary transformational process]. Obshchestvennyje nauki i sovremennost’. [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. 2005. No. 4. P. 13–25. (in Russ.)
11. Shok N. P. Sotsial’nyj potentsial sem’i v kontekste realizatsii semejnoj politiki v sovremennoj Rossii [Social potential of family in the context of the implementation of family policy in modern Russia]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social Policy and Sociology]. 2010. No. 8. P. 178–182. (in Russ.)
12. Sazonov A. A., Sazonova A. L. Semejnyj potentsial molodyh moskvichej v usloviyah sotsiokul’turnoj neodnorodnosti megapolisa [Family potential of young Muscovites and the problrms of its implementatinin a metropolis]. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitije) [MIR: Modernization. Innovation. Research]. 2015. Vol. 6. No. 3. P. 162–170. (in Russ.)
13. Dobrohleb V. G., Kondakova N. A. Semejnyj potentsial v usloviyah modernizatsii sovremennoj Rossii [Family potential in the conditions of modernization in present-day Russia]. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of Territory’s Development]. 2017. Is. 6(92). P. 94–107. (in Russ.)
14. Chernikova V. E., Mazaeva N. I. Dinamika semejnyh tsennostej: ot traditsionnyh do postsovremennyh [Dynamics of family values: from traditional to post-modern]. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke [Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being]. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 1A. P. 267–275. DOI: 10.25799/AR.2019.41.1.029 (in Russ.)
15. Golod S. I. Sotsiologo-demograficheskij analiz sostoyaniya i evolyutsii sem’i [Russian famly’s state and evolution — sociological demographic analysis]. Sotsis. [Socilogical Studies]. 2008. No. 1. P. 40–49. (in Russ.)
16. Borinskaya S., Inglehart R., Harro J., Cotter A., Ponarin E., & Welzel C. Genetic factors, cultural predispositions, happiness and gender equality. Journal of Research in Gender Studies. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 32–100.
17. Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: Thehuman Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press. 2005. P. 301–321.
18. Sorokin P. A. Glavnye tendentsii nashego vremeni [The Basic Trends of Our Times]. Moscow-Kazan. 2015. 260 p.
19. Toffler A. Tret’ya volna [The Third Wave]. AST. Moscow. 1999. 784 p. (in Russ.)
20. Fabrikant M., Magun V. Semejnyje tsennosti rossiyan i evropejtsev [Family values of Russians and Europeans]. Demoscope Weekly. 2014. No. 613–614. P. 1–15 (in Russ.)
21. Tsennosti semejno-detnogo obraza zhizni (SEDOZh-2019): Analiticheskij otchet po rezul’tatam mezhregional’nogo sotsiologo-demograficheskogo issledovaniya [The Family-Child Lifestyle Values (SeDOJ-2019). An analytical report on the results of an interregional sociological and demographic study]. Ed. Antonov A. I. Moscow. MAKS Press. 2020. 486 p. DOI: 10.29003/m857.SeDOJ-2019 (in Russ.)
22. Andryushina E. V., Panova E. A. Vliyanije gosudarstvennoj politiki na semejnyje strategii studencheskoj molodezhi [The impact of state policy on the family strategies of the student youth]. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravleniya) [Ars Administrandi (The Art of Administration)]. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 200–219. DOI: 10.17072/2218–9173–2019–2–200–219 (in Russ.)
23. Sinel’nikov A. B. Semejno-demograficheskaya politika i puti povysheniya yeyo effektivnosti [Family-demographic policy and ways to improve its effectiveness]. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2022. No. 2. P. 162–173 (in Russ.)
2. Genisaretsky O. I., Nosov N. A., Yudin B. G. Kontseptsiya chelovecheskogo potentsiala: osnovnyje polozheniya [The concept of human potential: basic provisions]. Chelovecheskiy potentsial: opyt kompleksnogo podkhoda [Human Potential: Experience of an Integrated Aproach]. Ed. I. T. Frolov. Editorial URSS. Moscow. 1999. 176 p. (in Russ.)
3. Sen A. Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning. 1989. No. 19. P. 41–58.
4. Rimashevskaya N. M. Chelovecheskij potentsial Rossii: vzglyad v 21 vek [Russia’s human potential: a look into the 21st century]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 1999. No. 1. P. 9–19. (in Russ.)
5. Rimashevskaya N. M. Kachestvennyj potentsial naseleniya Rossii: vzglyad v 21 vek [Qualitative potential of the population of Russia: a look into the 21st century]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development]. 2001. No. 3. P. 34–48. (in Russ.)
6. Rimashevskaya N. M. Kachestvo chelovecheskogo potentsiala v sovremennoj Rossii [Quality of human potential in today’s Russia]. Bezopasnost’ Evrasii [Eurasia Security]. 2004. No. 1. P. 21–37. (in Russ.)
7. Rimashevskaya N. M. Chelovecheskij potentsial Rossii i problemy «sberezheniya naseleniya» [The human potential of Russia and the problems of «saving the population»]. Rossijskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal [Russian Economic Journal]. 2004. No. 9–10. P. 22–40. (in Russ.)
8. Zhenshchiny, muzhchiny, sem’ya v Rossii: poslednyaya tret’ 20 veka. Proekt «Taganrog» [Woman, Man, Family in Russia: the Last Third of the 21st Century. Project «Taganrog»]. Ed. N. M. Rimashevskaya. ISEPN RAN [ISESP RAS]. Moscow. 2001. 320 p. (in Russ.)
9. Rimashevskaya N. M. Chelovek i reformy: sekrety vyzhivaniya [Person and Reforms: The Secrets of Survival]. ISEPN RAN [ISESP RAS]. Moscow. 2003. 392 p. (in Russ.)
10. Zaslavskaya, T. I. Chelovecheskij potentsial v sovremennom transformatsionnom protsesse [Human potential in contemporary transformational process]. Obshchestvennyje nauki i sovremennost’. [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. 2005. No. 4. P. 13–25. (in Russ.)
11. Shok N. P. Sotsial’nyj potentsial sem’i v kontekste realizatsii semejnoj politiki v sovremennoj Rossii [Social potential of family in the context of the implementation of family policy in modern Russia]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social Policy and Sociology]. 2010. No. 8. P. 178–182. (in Russ.)
12. Sazonov A. A., Sazonova A. L. Semejnyj potentsial molodyh moskvichej v usloviyah sotsiokul’turnoj neodnorodnosti megapolisa [Family potential of young Muscovites and the problrms of its implementatinin a metropolis]. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitije) [MIR: Modernization. Innovation. Research]. 2015. Vol. 6. No. 3. P. 162–170. (in Russ.)
13. Dobrohleb V. G., Kondakova N. A. Semejnyj potentsial v usloviyah modernizatsii sovremennoj Rossii [Family potential in the conditions of modernization in present-day Russia]. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of Territory’s Development]. 2017. Is. 6(92). P. 94–107. (in Russ.)
14. Chernikova V. E., Mazaeva N. I. Dinamika semejnyh tsennostej: ot traditsionnyh do postsovremennyh [Dynamics of family values: from traditional to post-modern]. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke [Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being]. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 1A. P. 267–275. DOI: 10.25799/AR.2019.41.1.029 (in Russ.)
15. Golod S. I. Sotsiologo-demograficheskij analiz sostoyaniya i evolyutsii sem’i [Russian famly’s state and evolution — sociological demographic analysis]. Sotsis. [Socilogical Studies]. 2008. No. 1. P. 40–49. (in Russ.)
16. Borinskaya S., Inglehart R., Harro J., Cotter A., Ponarin E., & Welzel C. Genetic factors, cultural predispositions, happiness and gender equality. Journal of Research in Gender Studies. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 32–100.
17. Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: Thehuman Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press. 2005. P. 301–321.
18. Sorokin P. A. Glavnye tendentsii nashego vremeni [The Basic Trends of Our Times]. Moscow-Kazan. 2015. 260 p.
19. Toffler A. Tret’ya volna [The Third Wave]. AST. Moscow. 1999. 784 p. (in Russ.)
20. Fabrikant M., Magun V. Semejnyje tsennosti rossiyan i evropejtsev [Family values of Russians and Europeans]. Demoscope Weekly. 2014. No. 613–614. P. 1–15 (in Russ.)
21. Tsennosti semejno-detnogo obraza zhizni (SEDOZh-2019): Analiticheskij otchet po rezul’tatam mezhregional’nogo sotsiologo-demograficheskogo issledovaniya [The Family-Child Lifestyle Values (SeDOJ-2019). An analytical report on the results of an interregional sociological and demographic study]. Ed. Antonov A. I. Moscow. MAKS Press. 2020. 486 p. DOI: 10.29003/m857.SeDOJ-2019 (in Russ.)
22. Andryushina E. V., Panova E. A. Vliyanije gosudarstvennoj politiki na semejnyje strategii studencheskoj molodezhi [The impact of state policy on the family strategies of the student youth]. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravleniya) [Ars Administrandi (The Art of Administration)]. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 200–219. DOI: 10.17072/2218–9173–2019–2–200–219 (in Russ.)
23. Sinel’nikov A. B. Semejno-demograficheskaya politika i puti povysheniya yeyo effektivnosti [Family-demographic policy and ways to improve its effectiveness]. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2022. No. 2. P. 162–173 (in Russ.)
Article
Received: 14.06.2023
Accepted: 11.12.2023
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Dobrokhleb, V. G., & Efanova, O. A. (2023). Family potential as a component of the human potential of Russian regions. Population, 26(4), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.4.9
Section
QUALITY AND CONDITIONS OF LIFE OF POPULATION
