Sociobiotechnical systems: a new approach to humanity-nature interaction

  • Oleg N. Yanitsky Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences oleg.yanitsky@yandex.ru
How to Cite
Yanitsky O.N. 2016. Sociobiotechnical systems: a new approach to humanity-nature interaction — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 5-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2016.4.3.4574

Abstract

The concept of socio-bio-technical system (SBT-system) as an interdisciplinary theoretical instrument for analysis of utmost complex geosphere processes is offered and substantiated. The existing dichotomy concepts like ‘society-nature’, ‘rural-urban’, ‘local-global’ are not fit to integrated, controversial, mobile and not linear processes that are going in the geosphere. Interdisciplinary and problem- oriented approach, combination of top-down and bottom-up analyses, mutual interpretation of research findings of social, natural and technical sciences, focus on metabolic nature of processes within the SBT-systems, their inherent risky nature, a periodical emergence of critical situations, the phenomenon of ‘space inversion’, the ‘follow the actor principle’, the relativity of notions of actor and its environment, and a network nature of any SBT-systems are the main points of the SBT-systems analysis. In the end of article the author offers an agenda of primary research tasks: follow the activist, glocal and dynamic methodology, the maintenance of permanent dialogue between natural, technical and social sciences, the necessity of institutional transformations within the science body as well as between it and socio-political practice, and the investigation of the role of individual and interest groups in the SBT-systems transformations.
Keywords:
activist method, critical situation, globalization, metabolism, problem-oriented and interdisciplinary approach, relativism, risk, socio-bio-technical system, wastes

Author Biography

Oleg N. Yanitsky, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctor of Philosophy Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher

References

Ahiezer A. S., Kogan L. B., Yanitsky O. N. Urbanizacija, obshhestvo i nauchno- tehnicheskaja revoljucija. [Urbanization, society and the technological revolution]. J. Voprosy filosofii. - 1969. - № 2. - S. 43-53. (In Russ).



Bauman Z. Tekuchaja sovremennost’. [Liquid modernity]. - SPb: Piter, 2008. - 240 s. (In Russ).



Budyko M. I. Global’naja ekologija. [Globalecology]. - M.: Nauka, 1977. - 231 s. (In Russ).



Vallerstajn Je. Posle liberalizma. [After liberalism]. - M.: Editorial URSS, 2003. - 256 s. (In Russ).



Chizhevskij A. L. Fizicheskie faktory istoricheskogo processa. [Physicalfactors of the historical process]. - Kaluga: 1-ja Gostipolitografija. 1924. - 123 s. (In Russ).



Chizhevskij A. L. Zemnoe jeho solnechnyh bur’. [The terrestrial echo of solar storms]. - M.: Mysl’, 1964. - 235 s. (In Russ).



Forrester Dzh. Dinamika razvitija goroda. [The dynamics of the city]. - M.: Progress,1974. - 287 s. (In Russ).



Ermolaeva P. O. Social’no-ekologicheskij metabolizm gorodov: konceptualizacija, nauchnye shkoly, sovremennye zarubezhnye issledovanija. [Socio-ecological metabolism of cities: conceptualisation, research school, modern foreign studies]. J. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. - 2015. - № 3 (11). - S. 34-50. (In Russ).



Gnatjuk N. Politicheskaja sub’ektnost’ Evropejskogo Sojuza. [The political subjectivity of the European Union].J. Mezhdunarodnye processy. - 2014. - № 12 (4). - S. 32-48. (In Russ).



Kapica P. L. Eksperiment, teorija, praktika. [Experiment, theory, practice]. - M: Nauka, 1981. - 495 s. (In Russ).



Kommoner B. Zamykajushhijsja krug. Priroda, chelovek, tehnologii. [Closing circle. Nature,people, technology]. - L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1974. - 146 s. (In Russ).



Kravchenko S. A., Salygin V. I. Uslozhnjajushhiesja opasnosti i riski sovremennogo magistral’nogo nefteprovodnogo transporta. [Complex dangers and risks of modern pipeline transport].J. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. - 2014. - № 4(8). - S. 50-66. (In Russ).



Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Porjadok iz haosa. Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj. [Order out of chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature]. — M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. — 432 s. (In Russ).



Sorokin P. A. Social’naja i kul’turnaja dinamika: Issledovanie izmenenij v bol’shih sistemah iskusstva, istiny, jetiki, prava i obshhestvennyh otnoshenij. [Social and cultural dynamics: a Study of changes in large systems of art, truth, ethics, law and public relations]. — SPb.: ZGHI, 2000. — 1056 s. (In Russ).



Sorokin P. A. Golod kak faktor. Vlijanie goloda na povedenie ljudej, social’nuju organizaciju i obshhestvennuju zhizn’. [Hunger as a factor. The influence of hunger on human behavior, social organization and social life]. — M.: Academia; LVS, 2003. — 684 s. (In Russ).



Vernadskij V. I. Problemy biogeohimii. [Problems of biogeochemistry]. J. Trudy biohimicheskoj laboratorii. Vyp. 16. — M.: Nauka, 1980. — 320 s. (In Russ).



Yanitsky O. N. Social’no-informacionnye processy v obshhestve i urbanizacija. [Social and informational processes in the society and urbanization]. J. Urbanizacija, NTR i rabochij klass / Otv. red. O. N. Yanitsky — M.: Nauka, 1972. — S. 76—96. (In Russ).



Yanitsky O. N. Metodologicheskie voprosy issledovanija social’no-ekologicheskih problem. [Methodological issues the study of socio-environmentalproblems]. J. Voprosy filosofii. — 1982. — № 3. — S. 91—99. (In Russ).



Yanitsky O. N. Dialog nauki i obshhestva. [ The dialogue of science and society]. J. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. — 2004. — № 6. — S. 86—96. (In Russ).



Yanitsky O. N. Risk-solidarnosti: rossijskaja versija. [Risk solidarity: Russian version].J. Inter. — 2004a. — № 2—3 — S. 52—62. (In Russ).



Yanitsky O. N. Metabolicheskaja koncepcija sovremennogo goroda. [The metabolic concept of the modern city]. J. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. — 2013. — № 3. — S. 16—32. (In Russ).



Yanitsky O. N. Sociologija kriticheskih sostojanij obshhestva. [Sociology of critical States of society]. J. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. — 2014. — № 4(8). — S. 5—24. (In Russ).



Bauman Z. Wasted Lives. Modernity and its Outcasts. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2004. — 140 p.



Bauman Z. 44 Letters from Liquid Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.



Bauman Z. Collateral Damage. Social Inequalities in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011a.



Bauman Z. Culture in a Liquid Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011b.



Beck U. Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. L.: SAGE. 1992. — 260 p.



Beck U. World Risk Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 1999. — 184 p.



Beck U. Risk. Cosmopolitan Version. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007. — 201 p.



Beck U. Emancipatory Catastrophism: What does it mean to Climate Change and Risk Society? // Current Sociology. 2015. № 63 (1). P. 75—88.



Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1: The Rise of Network Society. 2nd ed. Oxford: Willey-Blackwell, 2010.



Catton W. R. Jr., Dunlap R. E. Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm // American Sociologist. 1978. Vol. 13. P. 41—49.



Catton W. R. Jr., Dunlap R. E. A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology // American Behavioral Scientist. 1980. Vol. 24. № 1. Р. 15—47.



Fisher F. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2003. — 336 p.



Fisher-Kowalski M. Society’s Metabolism: On the Childhood and Adolescence of a Rising Conceptual Star // The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology / Ed. by M. Redklift, G. Woodgate. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 1997. Р. 119—137.



Fisher-Kowalski M., Haberl Н. Socioecological Transitions and Global Change. Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use. Vienna: Klagenfurt University, 2007. — 263 p.



Keen D. Complex Emergences. Cambridge: Polity, 2008. — 293 p.



Meier R. The Communication Theory of Urban Growth. Mass.: MIT Press. 1965. — 256 p.



Park R., Burgess R., McKenzie R. The City. Chicago, 1926.



Park R. Human Communities. The City and Human Ecology. Glencoe, 1952. Russian Critical Infrastructures. Vulnerabilities and Policies / Ed. by K. Pynnoniemi. Tampere: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2012. — 119 p.



Sassen S. Territory and Territoriality in the Global Economy // International Sociology. 2000. № 15 (2). Р. 372—393.



Urry J. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2008. — 335 p.



Waters M. Globalization. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 1995. — 185 p.



Wolman A. The Metabolism of the Cities // Scientific American. 1965. № 213 (3). Р. 178—193.



Yanitsky O. Socio-informational Aspects of Urbanization. Paper presented at the VII World Sociological Congress. Varna, Bulgaria. 1970. — 13 p.



Yanitsky O. Towards Creating a Socio-Ecological Conception of a City // Cities and Ecology. The International Expert Meeting. Souzdal, September 24—30, Moscow: Centre of International Projects. 1988. P. 54—57.



Yanitsky O. Modernization and Globalization from the Perspective of a Transition Society // Sociological Theory and the Environment / Ed. by A. Gijswijt, F. Buttel, P. Dickens, R. Dunlap, A. Mol, G. Spaargaren. Part II. Amsterdam: SISWO, 1998. P. 165—184.



Yanitsky O. A Primary Eco-Structure: The Concept and its Testing // Social Analysis. 2012. № 2 (2). Р. 7—24.



Yanitsky O. Sociology of Critical Areas // Open Journal of Social Science Research. — 2014. — № 2(3). — Р. 112—118.



Yanitsky O. New Developments in Environmental Sociology. 2016. [Electronic resource]: Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences. Official Website. URL: http://www.isras.m/publ.html?id=4308 (date of access: 18.08.2016).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Yanitsky, O. N. (2016) ’Sociobiotechnical systems: a new approach to humanity-nature interaction’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 4(3), pp. 5-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2016.4.3.4574.