Ergonomics and ergodesign in the context of the concept of sustainable development: harmonization of the socio-technogenic world
Research Article
How to Cite
Kuzmenko A.A. Ergonomics and ergodesign in the context of the concept of sustainable development: harmonization of the socio-technogenic world. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2024. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 49-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2024.2.4 (in Russ.).
Abstract
Objective of the study is to purpose of the study is to reveal the features of the relationship between ergonomics and ergodesign with sustainable development approaches.
The methodological basis socio-natural, interdisciplinary, and ergonomic approaches. The socio-natural approach, which originated under the influence of the ideas of the outstanding Russian scientist V. I. Vernadsky, is a philosophical concept aimed at analyzing the interrelationships between society and the natural environment. An interdisciplinary approach unites many sciences, which allows us to consider the changes taking place in the world and justify the impact exerted by society and the technosphere on the natural environment. The ergonomic approach allows us to systematically study human interaction with other elements of the system, creating conditions under which human-machine interaction does not have negative consequences.
Results of the study. The development of society and technology has an impact on the biosphere, generating instability, which manifests itself in the intensification of environmental crises. In this context, ergonomics focuses on the study of the human-technology-environment system (in a global context, society-technosphere-biosphere), which allows not only to optimize processes and working conditions, but also to contribute to mitigating the negative impact of human activity on the natural environment.
Research рerspectives. The development of this research will allow us to form a new approach to the ergonomic design (ergodesign) of the human environment in which the rules of harmonious interaction of elements of the sociosphere, technosphere and biosphere will be observed.
Keywords:
ergonomics, ergodesign, socio-technological development of the world, dichotomy of the concept of sustainable-unstable development, ergonomics of sustainable development
References
1. Akimova T. A., Moseikin Yu. N. Economics of sustainable development: Textbook. Moskva: ZAO «Izdatel'stvo «Ekonomika» = Moscow: CJSC Publishing House "Economics". 2009; 430 p. (In Russ.).
2. Barlybaev H. A. Sustainable development: a myth or a call to prudence. Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University – Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4: 14-24 (In Russ.).
3. Bobylev S. N. Sustainable development in the interests of future generations: economic priorities. Mir novoy ekonomiki = The world of the new economy. 2017; No. 3: 90-96 (In Russ.).
4. Girusov E. V. Ecological culture as the highest form of humanism. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Philosophy and society. 2009; 4: 74-92 (In Russ.).
5. Danilov-Danilyan V. I. Sustainable development. Ekologicheskaya entsiklopediya: T. 6. – Moskva: OOO «Izdatel'stvo «entsiklopediya» = Ecological encyclopedia: Vol. 6. – Moscow: LLC «Encyclopedia Publishing House», 2013; 656 p. (In Russ.).
6. Demidenko E. S., Dergacheva E. A., Popkova N. V. Philosophy of socio-technogenic development of the world: articles, concepts, terms: scientific edition. Moskva: Vsemirnaya inform-entsiklopediya; Bryansk: BGTU = Moscow: World Information Encyclopedia; Bryansk: BSTU. 2011; 388 p. (In Russ.).
7. Dergacheva E. A. Technogenic society, features of its formation and development. Aspirantskiy vestnik Povolzh'ya = Postgraduate bulletin of the Volga region. 2008; 1-2: 13-18 (In Russ.).
8. Kochergin A. N. Ecological culture as a factor of “sustainable development” of society: problems, opportunities, realities. Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University - Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4: 29-32 (In Russ.).
9. Kuzina L. V. Green economy as an alternative to the existing market economy. Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University – Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4; 37 p. (In Russ.).
10. Kuzmenko A. A. Conceptual foundations of sustainable and unstable development of life on earth in the conditions of socio-technogenic development of the world. Globalistika-2020 = Globalistics-2020. 2020; 632 p. (In Russ.).
11. Falko V. I. Sustainable development or harmonization of socio-natural systems? Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University – Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4: 5-10 (In Russ.).
12. Ashby W. R. Introduction to cybernetics. Moskva: Inostrannaya literatura = Moscow: Foreign literature. 1959; 432 p. (In Russ.).
13. Garcia-Acosta G., Romero P. A., M. H. Saravia. The method of ergoecological analysis. In: V Latin American Congress on Ergonomics of ABERGO. Salvador Bahia: ABERGO. 1999; 274.
14. Morey N. Ergonomics and global problems of the XXI century. Ergonomics. 1995; 38(8): 1691-1707.
2. Barlybaev H. A. Sustainable development: a myth or a call to prudence. Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University – Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4: 14-24 (In Russ.).
3. Bobylev S. N. Sustainable development in the interests of future generations: economic priorities. Mir novoy ekonomiki = The world of the new economy. 2017; No. 3: 90-96 (In Russ.).
4. Girusov E. V. Ecological culture as the highest form of humanism. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Philosophy and society. 2009; 4: 74-92 (In Russ.).
5. Danilov-Danilyan V. I. Sustainable development. Ekologicheskaya entsiklopediya: T. 6. – Moskva: OOO «Izdatel'stvo «entsiklopediya» = Ecological encyclopedia: Vol. 6. – Moscow: LLC «Encyclopedia Publishing House», 2013; 656 p. (In Russ.).
6. Demidenko E. S., Dergacheva E. A., Popkova N. V. Philosophy of socio-technogenic development of the world: articles, concepts, terms: scientific edition. Moskva: Vsemirnaya inform-entsiklopediya; Bryansk: BGTU = Moscow: World Information Encyclopedia; Bryansk: BSTU. 2011; 388 p. (In Russ.).
7. Dergacheva E. A. Technogenic society, features of its formation and development. Aspirantskiy vestnik Povolzh'ya = Postgraduate bulletin of the Volga region. 2008; 1-2: 13-18 (In Russ.).
8. Kochergin A. N. Ecological culture as a factor of “sustainable development” of society: problems, opportunities, realities. Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University - Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4: 29-32 (In Russ.).
9. Kuzina L. V. Green economy as an alternative to the existing market economy. Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University – Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4; 37 p. (In Russ.).
10. Kuzmenko A. A. Conceptual foundations of sustainable and unstable development of life on earth in the conditions of socio-technogenic development of the world. Globalistika-2020 = Globalistics-2020. 2020; 632 p. (In Russ.).
11. Falko V. I. Sustainable development or harmonization of socio-natural systems? Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik = Bulletin of the Moscow State Forestry University – Forest Bulletin. 2015; 4: 5-10 (In Russ.).
12. Ashby W. R. Introduction to cybernetics. Moskva: Inostrannaya literatura = Moscow: Foreign literature. 1959; 432 p. (In Russ.).
13. Garcia-Acosta G., Romero P. A., M. H. Saravia. The method of ergoecological analysis. In: V Latin American Congress on Ergonomics of ABERGO. Salvador Bahia: ABERGO. 1999; 274.
14. Morey N. Ergonomics and global problems of the XXI century. Ergonomics. 1995; 38(8): 1691-1707.
Article
Received: 09.03.2024
Accepted: 23.04.2024
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Kuzmenko, A. A. (2024). Ergonomics and ergodesign in the context of the concept of sustainable development: harmonization of the socio-technogenic world. Humanities of the South of Russia, 13(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2024.2.4
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
