Occasional Employment in the Context of Precarization of Labour in the European Union
Acknowledgments
This article was financially supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation N 16-18-10306.
How to Cite
Klimenko L.V. Occasional Employment in the Context of Precarization of Labour in the European Union. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2016. Vol. 21. No. 5. P. 93-101. (in Russ.).
Abstract
In the article based on the materials of the European statistical surveys and expert assessments quantitative scale, structural features and reasons for temporary employment in Western Europe are characterized. It is proved that permanent employment in occasional employment, which characterizes currently, about 25 million Europeans precarizes social and labor relations (infringes social and labor rights, belittles social standing of the population, distorts professional identity).
Keywords:
precarization, social and labour relations, occasional employment, precarizated work, professional identity
References
Bourdieu P. Counterfire: Against the Tyranny of the Market. L., 2003.
Kastel' R. Metamorfozy sotsial'nogo voprosa. Khronika naemnogo truda. SPb., 2009.
Stending G. Prekariat. Novyy opasnyy klass. M., 2014.
Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskiy V.V., Gasyukova E.N. Prekariat: teoriya i empiricheskiy analiz (na materialakh oprosov v Rossii, 1994–2013) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 12. S. 99–110.
Bobkov V.N., Veredyuk O.V., Kolosova R.P., Razumova T.O. Zanyatost' i sotsial'naya prekarizatsiya v Rossii: vvedenie v analiz. M., 2015.
Naemnyy rabotnik v sovremennoy Rossii / otv. red. Z.T. Golenkova. M., 2015.
Fedorova E.P., Yakovleva A.V. Neformal'naya zanyatost' v Rossii: tendentsii, prichiny // Nauchnyy zhurnal NIU ITMO. Ekonomika i ekologicheskiy menedzhment. 2014. № 1.
Politika v sfere zanyatosti vo imya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti i spravedlivoy globalizatsii. Doklad 6 [Elektronniy resurs]. Zheneva, 2010. S. 38. URL: http:// www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocment/wcms_140625.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 11.08.2016).
Shcherbakova E.M. Ekonomicheskaya aktivnost' naseleniya ES-28 [Elektronniy resurs] // Demoskop Weekly. 2015. № 657–658. URL: http:// demoscope.ru/weekly/ 2015/0657/barom04.php (data obrashcheniya: 07.08.2016).
Gasyukova E.N. Prekarizatsiya: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya, faktory i otsenki. Mir i Rossiya // Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. 2015. T. 8, № 6. S. 28–46.
Gialis S., Tsampra M. The diverse re-gional patterns of atypical employment in Greece: Production restructuring, re/deregulation and flexicurity under crisis // Geoforum. 2015. Т. 62. P. 175–187.
Kidder J.L. Hollywood, Bike Mes-sengers, and the New Economy // Critical So-ciology. 2016. Vol. 42 (2). P. 307–322.
Pilling D. Japan is creating yobs but workers do not prosper. Casualisation of the workforce is stifling the reflationary experi-ment // Financial Times. 2014. September 10.
Furlong A. The zone of precarity and discourses of vulnerability: NEET in the UK (Comparative Studies on NEET, Freeter, and Unemployed Youth in Japan and the UK). Tokyo Metropolitan University. 2007. No 42. P. 101–121.
Evropeyskiy rynok truda tak i ne opravilsya ot krizisa kontsa 2000-kh [Elektronniy resurs] // Analiticheskiy portal RuBaltic.Ru. 27.01.2016. URL: http:// www. rubaltic.ru/article/politika-i-obshchestvo/270116 -rynok-truda/ (data obrashcheniya: 11.08.2016).
Waite L. A place and space for a criti-cal geography of precarity? // Geography Compass. 2009. Vol. 3, No 1. P. 412–433.
Gonzales A. Neoliberalism, the home-land security state, and the authoritarian turn // Latino Studies. 2016. Vol. 14 (1). P. 80–98.
Syed I. Labor Exploitation and Health Inequities among Market Migrants: A Political Economy Perspective // Journal of Inter-national Migration and Integration. 2016. Vol. 17, No 2. P. 449–465.
Weeks S. Longing for “Normal” Post-Fordism: Cape Verdean Labor-Power on a Lisbon Periphery in Crisis // Anthropology of Work Review. 2015. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 13–25.
Toma S. The role of migrant networks in the labour market outcomes of Senegalese men: how destination contexts matter // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2016. Vol. 39 (4). P. 593–613.
Eurostat Statistics Database [Elektronniy resurs]. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/web/lfs/data/database (data obrashcheniya: 11.08.2016).
Vol'chik V.V., Posukhova O.Yu. Prekariat i professional'naya identichnost' v kontekste institucional'nykh izmeneniy // Terra Economicus. 2016. T. 14, № 2. S. 159–173.
Kastel' R. Metamorfozy sotsial'nogo voprosa. Khronika naemnogo truda. SPb., 2009.
Stending G. Prekariat. Novyy opasnyy klass. M., 2014.
Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskiy V.V., Gasyukova E.N. Prekariat: teoriya i empiricheskiy analiz (na materialakh oprosov v Rossii, 1994–2013) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 12. S. 99–110.
Bobkov V.N., Veredyuk O.V., Kolosova R.P., Razumova T.O. Zanyatost' i sotsial'naya prekarizatsiya v Rossii: vvedenie v analiz. M., 2015.
Naemnyy rabotnik v sovremennoy Rossii / otv. red. Z.T. Golenkova. M., 2015.
Fedorova E.P., Yakovleva A.V. Neformal'naya zanyatost' v Rossii: tendentsii, prichiny // Nauchnyy zhurnal NIU ITMO. Ekonomika i ekologicheskiy menedzhment. 2014. № 1.
Politika v sfere zanyatosti vo imya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti i spravedlivoy globalizatsii. Doklad 6 [Elektronniy resurs]. Zheneva, 2010. S. 38. URL: http:// www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocment/wcms_140625.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 11.08.2016).
Shcherbakova E.M. Ekonomicheskaya aktivnost' naseleniya ES-28 [Elektronniy resurs] // Demoskop Weekly. 2015. № 657–658. URL: http:// demoscope.ru/weekly/ 2015/0657/barom04.php (data obrashcheniya: 07.08.2016).
Gasyukova E.N. Prekarizatsiya: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya, faktory i otsenki. Mir i Rossiya // Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. 2015. T. 8, № 6. S. 28–46.
Gialis S., Tsampra M. The diverse re-gional patterns of atypical employment in Greece: Production restructuring, re/deregulation and flexicurity under crisis // Geoforum. 2015. Т. 62. P. 175–187.
Kidder J.L. Hollywood, Bike Mes-sengers, and the New Economy // Critical So-ciology. 2016. Vol. 42 (2). P. 307–322.
Pilling D. Japan is creating yobs but workers do not prosper. Casualisation of the workforce is stifling the reflationary experi-ment // Financial Times. 2014. September 10.
Furlong A. The zone of precarity and discourses of vulnerability: NEET in the UK (Comparative Studies on NEET, Freeter, and Unemployed Youth in Japan and the UK). Tokyo Metropolitan University. 2007. No 42. P. 101–121.
Evropeyskiy rynok truda tak i ne opravilsya ot krizisa kontsa 2000-kh [Elektronniy resurs] // Analiticheskiy portal RuBaltic.Ru. 27.01.2016. URL: http:// www. rubaltic.ru/article/politika-i-obshchestvo/270116 -rynok-truda/ (data obrashcheniya: 11.08.2016).
Waite L. A place and space for a criti-cal geography of precarity? // Geography Compass. 2009. Vol. 3, No 1. P. 412–433.
Gonzales A. Neoliberalism, the home-land security state, and the authoritarian turn // Latino Studies. 2016. Vol. 14 (1). P. 80–98.
Syed I. Labor Exploitation and Health Inequities among Market Migrants: A Political Economy Perspective // Journal of Inter-national Migration and Integration. 2016. Vol. 17, No 2. P. 449–465.
Weeks S. Longing for “Normal” Post-Fordism: Cape Verdean Labor-Power on a Lisbon Periphery in Crisis // Anthropology of Work Review. 2015. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 13–25.
Toma S. The role of migrant networks in the labour market outcomes of Senegalese men: how destination contexts matter // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2016. Vol. 39 (4). P. 593–613.
Eurostat Statistics Database [Elektronniy resurs]. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/web/lfs/data/database (data obrashcheniya: 11.08.2016).
Vol'chik V.V., Posukhova O.Yu. Prekariat i professional'naya identichnost' v kontekste institucional'nykh izmeneniy // Terra Economicus. 2016. T. 14, № 2. S. 159–173.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Klimenko, L. V. (2016). Occasional Employment in the Context of Precarization of Labour in the European Union. Humanities of the South of Russia, 21(5), 93-101. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/hsr/article/view/4652
Section
SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN MODERN SOCIETY
