Paradox of love
How to Cite
Pigulevskiy V.O., Mirskaya L.A. Paradox of love. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2016. Vol. 22. No. 6. P. 119-133. (in Russ.).
Abstract
In the article the love discourse in modern culture is analysed. In particular, the paradox of love in existentialism is seen as an expression of sensuality, freedom and seduction
Keywords:
love, body, desire, paradox, sensuality, existence, freedom, eros, game
References
Lakan Zh. Funkciya i pole rechi i yazyka v psikhoanalize. M., 1995.
Haydegger M. Pismo o gumanizme // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii. M., 1988.
Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. M., 2000.
Filosofskiy slovar. 22-e izd. M., 2003. Р. 458.
Fullbruk Ye., Fullbruk K. Seks i filosofiya. Harkov, 2014.
Bart R. Fragmenty rechi vlyublennogo. M., 1999.
Pigulevskiy V.O. Prakticheskaya estetika. Lap Lambert, 2012.
Gricanov A.A. Plot // Postmodernizm : enciklopediya. M., 2001.
Mirskaya L.A. Eros i soblazn. Rostov n/D., 1997.
Kyerkegor S. Dnevnik obolstitelya. Rostov n/D., 1998.
Kamyu A. Buntuyushhiy chelovek. M., 1990.
Haydegger M. Pismo o gumanizme // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii. M., 1988.
Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. M., 2000.
Filosofskiy slovar. 22-e izd. M., 2003. Р. 458.
Fullbruk Ye., Fullbruk K. Seks i filosofiya. Harkov, 2014.
Bart R. Fragmenty rechi vlyublennogo. M., 1999.
Pigulevskiy V.O. Prakticheskaya estetika. Lap Lambert, 2012.
Gricanov A.A. Plot // Postmodernizm : enciklopediya. M., 2001.
Mirskaya L.A. Eros i soblazn. Rostov n/D., 1997.
Kyerkegor S. Dnevnik obolstitelya. Rostov n/D., 1998.
Kamyu A. Buntuyushhiy chelovek. M., 1990.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Pigulevskiy, V. O., & Mirskaya, L. A. (2016). Paradox of love. Humanities of the South of Russia, 22(6), 119-133. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/hsr/article/view/4781
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
