Genesis of the typology of personality in social and philosophical cognition
How to Cite
Lustin Y.M. Genesis of the typology of personality in social and philosophical cognition. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 157-165. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article contains an attempt to analyse the process of appearance of the phenomenon of typology of personality in social and philosophical cognition. Comparative, phenomenological and dialectical methods are used both with the main principles of system approach.The aim of this work is to do social and philosophical investigation of formation of typological approach to the personality. The approaches of foreign authors (A. Adler, T. Adorno, Ph. Bopp, M. Weber, E. Kretschmer, Ch. Cooley, W. Thomas, Ch. Ferguson, E. Fromm, E. Spranger, C.G. Jung) and Russian sciences (A.G. Asmolov, A.A. Bodalev, B.S. Bratus, A.A. Derkach, Yu.D. Desheriyev, M.M. Gukhman, V.A. Koltsova, M.G. Yaroshevsky and others) to the issue of typology of personality are analyzed. Social and anthropological preconditions for forming of a particular type of are outlined. The dynamics of the genesis of typology of personality in different historical evolutional periods is shown. The author comes to the conclusion that the history of philosophy contains extensive data about substantial human features and attributes, dialectical interconnections and ways of expression in different spheres of social life. Currently social and philosophical discussion about the typology of personality needs theoretical background to meet modern social requests.
Keywords:
genesis, human, type, typology of personality, social being, reflection
References
V.S. Golubev. Priroda – chelovek – obshestvo: Razvitiye i garmoniya. M., 2016. 256 p.
А.N. Markov. Evolutsiya cheloveka. М., 2012. 496 p.
Yu.S. Starkin. Tipologizatsiya istoricheskogo processa: sotsialno-filosofsky analiz : avtoref. dis. … cand. filos. nauk. Tver, 2010. 18 p.
Т.А. Gorelova. Pervobitniye prototipy ekologicheskogo soznaniya // Chelovek. 2007. No. 3. P. 52–60.
А.S. Kravets. Stanovleniye sotsialnoy germenevtiky // Vestnik VGU. Filosofia. 2012. No. 1. P. 48–100.
N.Ye. Osipov. Genezis i istoricheskaya evolutsiya mentalnikh tsennostey cheloveka ot pervobitnosti k Novomu vremeny (zapadnoyevropeyskiy kontekst) // Filosofiya i obshchestv. 2009. No. 1. P. 124–137.
E. Edinger. Ego i arkhetip. М, 2016. 344 p.
О.А. Zaporozhchenko. Тip lichnosty “stoik” kak obyekt izucheniya sotsiologii dukhovnoy zhizny : avtoref. dis. … kand. sotsiol. nauk. Tambov, 2003. 19 p.
N.M. Ketskalo. Evolutsiya problem lichnosty v istorii filosofskoy mysly // Vestnik MGTU. 2006. Vol. 9, no. 4. P. 547–555.
Problemy sovremennogo antroposocialnogo poznaniya : sb. st. / pod obshch. red. N.V. Popkovoy. Briansk, 2013. No. 17. 140 p.
J.B. Asendorpf. Head-to-head compar-ison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions // European Journal of Personality. 2003. No. 17. P. 327–346.
W. Cheney, D. Pierce, D. Carl. Behav-ior analysis and learning. N.Y., 2008. 368 p.
C.G. Jung. Memories, Dreams, Re-flections. N.Y., 1989. 402 p.
C.G. Jung. Psychological Types // Col-lected Works. Princeton, 1972. Vol. 6. 324 p.
C.G. Jung. Two Essays on Analytical Psychology // Collected Works. Princeton, 1966. Vol. 7. 488 p.
D. Keirsey. Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. N.Y., 1998. 228 p.
E.J. Phares, W.F. Chaplin. Introduc-tion to personality. N.Y., 2008. 384 p.
D.J. Pittenger. The limitations of ex-tracting typologies from trait measures of per-sonality // Personality and Individual Differ-ences. 2004. No. 37. P. 779–787.
D. Sharp. Personality types: Jung's model of typology. Toronto, 1989. 232 p.
C. Zeisset. The Art of Dialogue: Ex-ploring Personality Differences for More Effective Communication. Gainesville, 2006. 286 p.
А.N. Markov. Evolutsiya cheloveka. М., 2012. 496 p.
Yu.S. Starkin. Tipologizatsiya istoricheskogo processa: sotsialno-filosofsky analiz : avtoref. dis. … cand. filos. nauk. Tver, 2010. 18 p.
Т.А. Gorelova. Pervobitniye prototipy ekologicheskogo soznaniya // Chelovek. 2007. No. 3. P. 52–60.
А.S. Kravets. Stanovleniye sotsialnoy germenevtiky // Vestnik VGU. Filosofia. 2012. No. 1. P. 48–100.
N.Ye. Osipov. Genezis i istoricheskaya evolutsiya mentalnikh tsennostey cheloveka ot pervobitnosti k Novomu vremeny (zapadnoyevropeyskiy kontekst) // Filosofiya i obshchestv. 2009. No. 1. P. 124–137.
E. Edinger. Ego i arkhetip. М, 2016. 344 p.
О.А. Zaporozhchenko. Тip lichnosty “stoik” kak obyekt izucheniya sotsiologii dukhovnoy zhizny : avtoref. dis. … kand. sotsiol. nauk. Tambov, 2003. 19 p.
N.M. Ketskalo. Evolutsiya problem lichnosty v istorii filosofskoy mysly // Vestnik MGTU. 2006. Vol. 9, no. 4. P. 547–555.
Problemy sovremennogo antroposocialnogo poznaniya : sb. st. / pod obshch. red. N.V. Popkovoy. Briansk, 2013. No. 17. 140 p.
J.B. Asendorpf. Head-to-head compar-ison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions // European Journal of Personality. 2003. No. 17. P. 327–346.
W. Cheney, D. Pierce, D. Carl. Behav-ior analysis and learning. N.Y., 2008. 368 p.
C.G. Jung. Memories, Dreams, Re-flections. N.Y., 1989. 402 p.
C.G. Jung. Psychological Types // Col-lected Works. Princeton, 1972. Vol. 6. 324 p.
C.G. Jung. Two Essays on Analytical Psychology // Collected Works. Princeton, 1966. Vol. 7. 488 p.
D. Keirsey. Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. N.Y., 1998. 228 p.
E.J. Phares, W.F. Chaplin. Introduc-tion to personality. N.Y., 2008. 384 p.
D.J. Pittenger. The limitations of ex-tracting typologies from trait measures of per-sonality // Personality and Individual Differ-ences. 2004. No. 37. P. 779–787.
D. Sharp. Personality types: Jung's model of typology. Toronto, 1989. 232 p.
C. Zeisset. The Art of Dialogue: Ex-ploring Personality Differences for More Effective Communication. Gainesville, 2006. 286 p.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Lustin, Y. M. (2017). Genesis of the typology of personality in social and philosophical cognition. Humanities of the South of Russia, 23(1), 157-165. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/hsr/article/view/4975
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
