Anthropological circuits of power in A. Kojeve’s and M. Weber’s concepts: the experience of comparative analysis
How to Cite
Сhernykh S.S., Shvachkina L.A. Anthropological circuits of power in A. Kojeve’s and M. Weber’s concepts: the experience of comparative analysis. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 166-174. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of anthropological circuits of power in A. Kojeve’s and M. Weber’s concepts, and focuses both on typological similarities and differences between the compared theories. The anthropological circuits of power, interpreted in the light of the organization of legitimate order are analyzed. It is noted that the two concepts include temporal analysis of power. However, A. Kojeve’s concept is metaphysical in nature, whereas the background of M. Weber’s discussions contains explicit anti-metaphysical installation. The differences in understanding of rationality by the two thinkers are demonstrated. They are associated with various interpretations of interaction between faith and reason in human practice.
Keywords:
anthropological circuits of power, authority as power and domination, legitimacy, charisma, rationality, metaphysics of power, temporal analysis of power
References
Aristotel'. Metafizika. M., 2006. 608 p.
M. Veber. Izbrannoe: Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. M.; SPb. 2014. 656 p.
P.P. Gaydenko. Nauchnaya ratsional'nost' i filosofskiy razum. M., 2003. 528 p.
G.V.F. Gegel'. Fenomenologiya dukha. Filosofiya istorii. M., 2003. 880 p.
Kh. Yoas. Kreativnost' deystviya. SPb., 2005. 320 p.
A. Kozhev. Ateizm i drugie raboty. M., 2006. 512 p.
A. Kozhev. Ponyatie vlasti. M., 2007. 192 p.
V.G. Ledyaev. Vlast': kontseptual'nyy analiz. M., 2001. 384 p.
F. Nitsshe. Po tu storonu dobra i zla : soch. M., 2003. 848 p.
P. Riker. Put' priznaniya. M., 2010. 268 p.
P.A. Sapronov. Vlast' kak metafizicheskaya i istoricheskaya real'nost'. SPb., 2001. 816 p.
S.S. Chernykh. Arkhetipicheskie formy proyavleniya vlasti v antropologicheskoy perspektive // Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2014. № 5. P. 16–21.
S.S. Chernykh. Metafizicheskoe ponimanie vlasti i formy ee legitimatsii v antropologicheskoy perspektive // Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2015. № 2. P. 14–17.
A. Honneth. Disrespect. The Norma-tive Foundations of Critical Theory. Cam-bridge, 2007. 275 p.
A. Honneth. The Struggle of Recog-nition: The Moral Grammar of Social Con-flicts. Cambridge, 1995. 215 p.
M. Veber. Izbrannoe: Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. M.; SPb. 2014. 656 p.
P.P. Gaydenko. Nauchnaya ratsional'nost' i filosofskiy razum. M., 2003. 528 p.
G.V.F. Gegel'. Fenomenologiya dukha. Filosofiya istorii. M., 2003. 880 p.
Kh. Yoas. Kreativnost' deystviya. SPb., 2005. 320 p.
A. Kozhev. Ateizm i drugie raboty. M., 2006. 512 p.
A. Kozhev. Ponyatie vlasti. M., 2007. 192 p.
V.G. Ledyaev. Vlast': kontseptual'nyy analiz. M., 2001. 384 p.
F. Nitsshe. Po tu storonu dobra i zla : soch. M., 2003. 848 p.
P. Riker. Put' priznaniya. M., 2010. 268 p.
P.A. Sapronov. Vlast' kak metafizicheskaya i istoricheskaya real'nost'. SPb., 2001. 816 p.
S.S. Chernykh. Arkhetipicheskie formy proyavleniya vlasti v antropologicheskoy perspektive // Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2014. № 5. P. 16–21.
S.S. Chernykh. Metafizicheskoe ponimanie vlasti i formy ee legitimatsii v antropologicheskoy perspektive // Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2015. № 2. P. 14–17.
A. Honneth. Disrespect. The Norma-tive Foundations of Critical Theory. Cam-bridge, 2007. 275 p.
A. Honneth. The Struggle of Recog-nition: The Moral Grammar of Social Con-flicts. Cambridge, 1995. 215 p.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
СhernykhS. S., & Shvachkina, L. A. (2017). Anthropological circuits of power in A. Kojeve’s and M. Weber’s concepts: the experience of comparative analysis. Humanities of the South of Russia, 23(1), 166-174. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/hsr/article/view/4976
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
