The Dialectics of the Evolutionary and Revolutionary Changes in Terms of Social Entropy Representation in the History of Russian Society

  • Maxim A. Gnatyuk Samara State Transport University gnatuk_m@yandex.ru
  • Il'ya V. Pechkurov South of Russia Branch of The Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Rostov-on-Don i.pechkurov@gmail.com
  • Gennadiy A. Vorob'ev Pyatigorsk State University vorobyev@pglu.ru
How to Cite
Gnatyuk M.A., Pechkurov I.V., Vorob’ev G.A. The Dialectics of the Evolutionary and Revolutionary Changes in Terms of Social Entropy Representation in the History of Russian Society. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 189-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2017.4.18 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The modern society is largely determined by the historical trajectory of its development. In terms of the study of social entropy in the development of modern reality special attention is attracted to the revolutionary and evolutionary changes. This article discusses the peculiarities of social entropy in terms of evolutionary and revolutionary changes that are closely related to the vectors and forms of semantic interaction between past and present in the logic of the entropic growth and the deployment of sociality. The authors substantiates that the expansion of social entropy is the consequence of the social memory disruption as a symbolic reconstruction of the past in the present and the attitudes to the previous social and cultural experience.
Keywords:
social entropy, evolutionary and revolutionary change, social reality reproduction, historical memory, social memory

Author Biographies

Maxim A. Gnatyuk, Samara State Transport University
Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Teacher
Il'ya V. Pechkurov, South of Russia Branch of The Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Rostov-on-Don
Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Researcher
Gennadiy A. Vorob'ev, Pyatigorsk State University
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Head of the Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Mathematics and Information Security,

References

Nort D. Vklad neoinstitutsionalizma v ponimanie problem perekhodnoy ekonomiki [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www. finansy.ru/publ/north.htm (data obrashcheniya: 29.06.2016).



Sorokin P.A. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika. M. : Astrel', 2006. 1176 p.



Moskovichi S.M. Mashina, tvoryashchaya bogov : per. s fr. M. : Tsentr psikhologii i psikhoterapii, 1998. 560 p.



Pogrebnyak A.A. K metafizike sotsial'nogo vzryva (kratkiy opyt o revolyutsii) // Revolyutsiya i sovremennost' : sb., posvyashchennyy pamyati dotsenta kafedry sotsial'noy filosofii i filosofii istorii Pochepko V.A. SPb. : Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo, 2001. P. 102–103.



Vasil'kova V.V. Sinergetika i teoriya sotsial'noy samoorganizatsii : avtoref. dis. … d-ra filos. nauk. SPb., 1999.



Shevelev V.N. Vse moglo byt' inache. Rostov n/D. : Feniks, 2009. 349 p.



Pantin I.K. Drama rossiyskikh re-form i revolyutsiy // Imperiya i liberaly : materialy Mezhdunar. konf. SPb., 2001. P. 27–75.



Yampol'skiy M. Nastoyashchee kak razryv. Zametki ob istorii i pamyati // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2007. № 83. P. 51–74.



Klyamkin I. Zatukhayushchaya tsiklichnost' [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http:// www.liberal.ru/2012/11/07/ (data obrashcheniya: 29.06.2016).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Gnatyuk, M. A., Pechkurov, I. V., & Vorob’ev, G. A. (2017). The Dialectics of the Evolutionary and Revolutionary Changes in Terms of Social Entropy Representation in the History of Russian Society. Humanities of the South of Russia, 6(4), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2017.4.18
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY