Intertextuality and Intersubjectivity of City Text: Functional and Communicative Aspect
How to Cite
Kuznetsova A.V., Petrulevich I.A. Intertextuality and Intersubjectivity of City Text: Functional and Communicative Aspect. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 5. P. 143-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2018.5.11 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article analyzes the gender aspects of power in terms of the change and mutual struggle of cultural formations, such as matriarchy and patriarchy. The author stand on the following idea: the causes of the destruction of the ancient matriarchy and the approval of patriarchal culture, and also the struggle for power of the sexes is analyzed in the terms of anthropological transformations of the Modern Age. It is demonstrated that power as a special cultural and anthropological reality not only absorbs gender differences, but actively uses them in the interests of strengthening its own domination. In the conclusion of the article the author underlines that the struggle for total gender equality, aimed at leveling gender differences, can lead to the problems of sexual identity and the excesses of androgyny.
Keywords:
urban text, intersubject, intertextuality, semiosis, sign, urban environment, communicative space
References
Bart, R. (1989). Selected works: Semiotics: Poetics. (Trans.). G.K. Kosikova (Ed.). Moscow: Progress.
Burd'yo, P. (1998). Structure, habit, practice. (Trans. N.A. Shmatko). Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii, I, 2. (in Russian).
Kanklini, N.G. (1998). Urban cultures at the end of the century: anthropological perspectives. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal social'nyh nauk, 6, 20, 59-73. (in Russian).
Kastel's, M.I. (2000). Information Age. Economy, society and culture. Moscow: GU VSh.
Kuznecova, A.V., Petrulevich, I.A. (2017). Discursiveness of urban culture in the coordinates of identity and evaluation. Vestnik YurGTU (NPI). Social'no-ekonomicheskie nauki, 6, 68-72. (in Russian).
Lotman, Yu.M. (1998). About art. SPb.: Iskusstvo.
Nikitin, V.A., Nikitina E.I. The principle of the city: an organizational enterprise. Available at: http://circle.ru/personalia/ nikitin/pg.html.
Pirogov, S.V. (2009). Socio-cultural design of urban life. Kurs lekcij. Tomsk.
Trushina, L.E. Interpretation of the visual texts of urban space. Available at: http://anthropology.ru.
Burd'yo, P. (1998). Structure, habit, practice. (Trans. N.A. Shmatko). Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii, I, 2. (in Russian).
Kanklini, N.G. (1998). Urban cultures at the end of the century: anthropological perspectives. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal social'nyh nauk, 6, 20, 59-73. (in Russian).
Kastel's, M.I. (2000). Information Age. Economy, society and culture. Moscow: GU VSh.
Kuznecova, A.V., Petrulevich, I.A. (2017). Discursiveness of urban culture in the coordinates of identity and evaluation. Vestnik YurGTU (NPI). Social'no-ekonomicheskie nauki, 6, 68-72. (in Russian).
Lotman, Yu.M. (1998). About art. SPb.: Iskusstvo.
Nikitin, V.A., Nikitina E.I. The principle of the city: an organizational enterprise. Available at: http://circle.ru/personalia/ nikitin/pg.html.
Pirogov, S.V. (2009). Socio-cultural design of urban life. Kurs lekcij. Tomsk.
Trushina, L.E. Interpretation of the visual texts of urban space. Available at: http://anthropology.ru.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Kuznetsova, A. V., & Petrulevich, I. A. (2018). Intertextuality and Intersubjectivity of City Text: Functional and Communicative Aspect. Humanities of the South of Russia, 7(5), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2018.5.11
Section
CULTURE AND GLOBALIZATION
