The Dialectics of “Important” and “Priority” in the Ensuring the Ecological Safety of Social Medium (Expert Analysis)
How to Cite
Sillaste G.G. The Dialectics of “Important” and “Priority” in the Ensuring the Ecological Safety of Social Medium (Expert Analysis). Humanities of the South of Russia. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 5. P. 260-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2018.5.22 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article is based on a socially-constructive expert analysis of the document “On the Strategy of Environmental Security of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2025”, which is presented in four sociological topics: on violation of dialectical logic as a methodological principle for developing a management document; about “strategy” as a key category of document status; an obvious and unjustified absolutization of the categories of “challenges” and “threats” divorced from “vital interests” (individual, population, society and the state); Social implementation mechanism or practical recommendations? (about the question regarding the basic mechanisms for implementing the state policy in the field of environmental safety). The author pays special attention to the theoretical and methodological imperfection of the document. The author’s statement reveals the weakest points of the developed document, its contradictions and imperfections, proposals for finalizing the strategy and specifying the activities of state and regional authorities in the field of environmental protection Coy policy.
Keywords:
dialectic logic, contradiction, strategy, important, priority, threats to environmental safety, challenges, vital interests, prevention, world system
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Sillaste, G. G. (2018). The Dialectics of “Important” and “Priority” in the Ensuring the Ecological Safety of Social Medium (Expert Analysis). Humanities of the South of Russia, 7(5), 260-269. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2018.5.22
Section
EXPERTISE