The Complicating Dynamics of the Russian Sociology: the Effects of the “Arrow of Time”

  • Sergey A. Kravchenko Moscow State University of International Relations of the MFA of the Russian Federation; Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow sociol7@yandex.ru
How to Cite
Kravchenko S.A. The Complicating Dynamics of the Russian Sociology: the Effects of the “Arrow of Time”. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 33-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.1.2 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The author spreads the ideas of the “arrow of time”, put forward by the Nobel Prize winner I.R. Prigogine on the complex self-development of the inanimate and living matter, as well as socium, on the dynamics of the scientific knowledge in general and sociological one in particular. It is shown that under the influence of the effects of the “arrow of time” the sociology in Russia and the world develops non-linearly and unevenly, there are complex reciprocal influences. In the historical context this can be seen in the example of mutual enrichment and confrontation of such trends as Occidentophillism, Slavophilism, and Euraziystvo that originally arose in the Russian sociology. The non-linear development of the sociological knowledge began to manifest itself in the early twentieth century which was expressed in the form of the violations of the continuity of the development and the artificial destruction of the “bourgeois” knowledge - that was opposed by the “small worlds” of Russian and foreign scientists. However, the clearly evident complicating dynamics of Russian sociology becomes at the end of the twentieth century and especially in the twenty-first century which is revealed by the examples of non-linear increasing knowledge at the world sociological congress to which the Russian scientists contributed. It is particularly noted that, taking into account the negative side-effects of the “arrow of time”, the Russian sociologists have done a lot in recent years to revive the culturally-based interdisciplinarity of the scientific knowledge, and to make a humanistic turn in the scientific knowledge itself.
Keywords:
the becoming of the complex socium, nonlinear development, sideeffects, the dynamics of the Russian sociology, the world sociological thought, world sociological congresses, metamorphosis, digitalization, digital power, digital violence, digital justice

Author Biography

Sergey A. Kravchenko, Moscow State University of International Relations of the MFA of the Russian Federation; Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Moscow State University of International Relations of the MFA of the Russian Federation; Main Researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

References

Arab-ogly, Eh.A. (1973). In the maze of prophecies: social prediction and ideological struggle. M.: Molodaya gvardiya.



Bestuzhev-Lada, I.V. (1984). Search social forecasting: perspective problems of society. The experience of systematization. M.: Nauka.



Volkov, Yu.G. (2016). Images of ideology and humanism in modern Russia. M.: Knorus.



Gvishiani, D.M. (1972). Organization and management. M.: Nauka.



Golenkova, Z.T., Narbut, N.P. (2003). The history of sociological thought in Central and Eastern Europe. M.: RUDN.



Gorshkov, M.K. (2016). Russian society as it is (experience of sociological diagnostics). In 2 Vols. M.: Novyj hronograf, 1



Humanistic turn: the imperative of human civilization (2018). In S.A. Kravchenko (Ed.). M.: MGIMO-Universitet.



Davydov, Yu.N. (1977). Criticism of the socio-philosophical views of the Frankfurt School. M.: Nauka.



Dzheri, D., Dzheri, Dzh. (1999). Big explanatory sociological dictionary. M.: VECHE-AST.



Confidence in knowledge in the context of social turbulence: risks, vulnerabilities, security challenges (2018). In S.A. Kravchenko (Ed.). M.: MGIMO-Universitet.



Ermolenko, D.V. (1977). Sociology and problems of international relations. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.



Zamoshkin, Yu.A. (1966). The crisis of bourgeois individualism and personality, a sociological analysis of some trends in social psychology of the United States. M.: Nauka.



Zdravomyslov, A.G. (1986). Needs. Interests. Values. M.: Politizdat.



Ionin, L.G. (1979). Understanding sociology. M.: Nauka.



Kon, I.S. (1978). Sociology of personality. M.: Politizdat.



Kravchenko, S.A. (2009). Dynamics of sociological thinking and imagination. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 8. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2008). Bridges connecting all sorts of splits of sociology for the sake of a more equal world. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2017). Metamorphosis: Essence, Complicating Types, Place in Sociological Knowledge. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 10. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2015). Bridges connecting all sorts of splits of sociology for the sake of a more equal world. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2014). New food risks: the need for a humanistic biopolitics. Polis, 5. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2015). “Normal anomie”: the production of “nothing”. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social'naya praktika, 3. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2014). Rediscovery of social reality as an indicator of the validity of sociological knowledge. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 5. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2017). The coexistence of riscophobia and risophilia is a manifestation of “normal anomie”. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2, 3-13. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2016). Sociological diagnosis of risks, vulnerabilities, trust. M.: MGIMO-Universitet.



Kravchenko, S.A. (2011). Sociology in the movement to the interaction of theoretical and methodological approaches. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 1. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A. (2014). The Arrow of Time: Modern Challenges to Sociological Knowledge. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social'naya praktika, 1. (in Russian).



Kravchenko, S.A., Perova, A.E. (2017). “New catastrophism” and the future: the demand for non-linear knowledge. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Sociologiya, 17 (4). (in Russian).



Lapin, N.I. (1986). Young Marx. M.: Politizdat.



Levada, Yu.A. (1969). Lectures on sociology. M.



“Normal anomie” in Russia and the modern world (2017). In S.A. Kravchenko (Ed.). M.: MGIMO-Universitet.



Osipov, G.V. (1964). Modern Bourgeois Sociology: Critical Essay. M.: Nauka.



Prigozhin, I., Stengers, I. (2000). Order from chaos. A new dialogue between man and nature. M.: Ehditorial URSS.



Dictionary of the latest sociological vocabulary (with English equivalents) (2018). In S.A. Kravchenko (Ed.). M.: MGIMO-Universitet.



Modern Western Sociology (1990). Dictionary. In Yu.N. Davydov (Ed.). M.: Politizdat.



Sorokin, P.A. (2000). Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Changes in the Great Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law, and Social Relations. SPb.: ZKHGI.



Sociological encyclopedic dictionary in Russian, English, German, French and Czech. In G.V. Osipov (Ed.). M.: NORMA-INFRA-M, 1998.



Sociology of nutrition: traditions and transformations (2017). In S.A. Kravchenko, N.N. Zarubina (Eds.). M.: MGIMO-Universitet.



Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2018). Prekariat: from protoclass to new class. M.: Nauka.



Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2008). Sociology of labor. M.: Yuniti-Dana.



Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2005). Sociology of labor: experience of new reading. M.: Mysl'.



Francov, G.P. (1969). Historical ways of social thought. M.: Mysl'.



Yadov, V.A. (1976). On the dispositional regulation of social behavior. In Metodologicheskie problem social'noj psihologii. M.: Nauka.



Yanickij, O.N. (2018). Globalization. City. Person. M.: FNISC.



Beck, U. (2007). Beyond Class and Nation. British Journal of Sociology, 58 (4).



Beck, U. (2016).The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.



Braidotti, R. (2015). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.



Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.



Crane, D. (1969). Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the “Invisible College” Hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34.



Messages to the World. XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology, Yokohama, Japan, July, 2014. Japan Consortium for Sociological Societies.



Mosco, V. (2017). Becoming Digital. Toward a Post-Internet Society. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.



Perrow, Ch. (2011). The Next Catastrophe: Reducing our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton University Press.



Ritzer, G. (2001). Explorations in Social Theory. From Metatheorizing to Rationalization. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.



Tiryakian, E.A. (2013). Updating Sorokin. Introduction to the Transaction Edition. In E.A. Tiryakian (Ed.). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.



Urry, J. (2003). Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.



Vanderburg, W.H. (2016). Our Battle for the Human Spirit. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Kravchenko, S. A. (2019). The Complicating Dynamics of the Russian Sociology: the Effects of the “Arrow of Time”. Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.1.2
Section
MODERN RUSSIAN SOCIETY