The Tactics of Social Behavior of Young People in the South of Russia in the Political Sphere in Terms of Socio-Political Frustration
How to Cite
Gromakova V.G., Shevchenko O.N., Usencova E.A. The Tactics of Social Behavior of Young People in the South of Russia in the Political Sphere in Terms of Socio-Political Frustration. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 148-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.2.11 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article describes the results of a pilot study of the tactics of social behavior of South Russian youth in a situation of dissatisfaction with the actions of the government. The choice of the problem is due to the fall in the ratings of the President and the government, which indicates an increase in social discontent and hypothetically can lead to socio-political destabilization. Ideological positions and behavioral readiness of young people as the most politically active part of society are of great importance for the development of the situation.In the course of the study, the method of sociological survey revealed several trends that reproduce the results of other studies: among young Russians there is a high level of socio-economic and socio-political frustration, the tendency to see the President of the country as a Superman, the personification of popular discontent with the actions of the state apparatus, the expectation of financial support from the state and the imposition on the government of all responsibility for the unworthy level of economic development. At the same time, a number of aspects of respondents' social behavior tactics in the political sphere were identified, which due to the unrepresentative nature of the sample can not be extrapolated to the General population, but can serve as a basis for setting the objectives of the following research in this area. These include: gullibility in matters of criticism of public authority; skepticism about the hypotheses of foreign interference; high percentage are willing to join the protest and preference avoidance tactics of the other respondents; a high degree of awareness of the usefulness of legal ways to fight for their own rights and low willingness to implement relevant social practices.
Keywords:
social and political frustration, social behavior, tactics of social behavior, social and political attitudes, willingness to act
References
Andreev, A.P., Selivanov, A.I. (2001). Western individualism and Russian tradition. Filosofija i obshhestvo, 4, 98-126. (in Russian).
Gorshkov, M.K. (2016). Russian society as it is (experience of sociological diagnostics): in 2 vol. 2nd ed. M.: Novyj hronograf.
Degtyarev, A.K., Shcherbakova, L.I. (2013). Political behavior: interpretation in the sociological view of M. Weber and P. Bourdieu. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye znaniya, 7, 63-69. (in Russian).
Ilyin, V.V., Panarin, A.S., Badovsky, D.V. (1995). Political anthropology. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University.
Kara-Murza, S.G. (2009). State paternalism – civilizational dimension. Nauchnyj jekspert, 12, 16-25. (in Russian).
Kara-Murza, S.G. (2013). Russia and the West: Paradigms of civilizations. M.: Akad. proekt, 98-119.
Lubsky, V.A., Atoyan, S.M., Bespalova, A.A., Vyalykh, N.A., Kolesnikova, E.Yu., Krupennikova, L.S., Lubskiy, R.A., Serikov, A.V., Tereshchenko, A.A., Chernobrovkina, N.I. (2016). Mental programs and models of social behavior in Russian society. Rostov-on-Don: Science and Education Foundation.
Lubsky, V.A., Bespalova, A.A., Voitenko V.P., Vyalykh, N.A., Zaytseva A.A., Kolesnikova, E.Yu., Krupennikova, L.S., Lubskiy, R.A., Serikov, Chernobrovkina (2017). Mental programs and modal models of social behavior the South of Russia. M.: Socio-humanitarian knowledge, 2017.
Lubsky, A.V., Lubsky, R.A. (2013). Etatism and paternalism as cultural markers of civilizational identity in Russia. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 3, 90-103. (in Russian).
Lubsky, R.A. (2012). Statehood and paternalism in Russia. Filosofija prava, 6 (55), 19-21. (in Russian).
Obolonsky, A.V. (1991). Conservative syndrome in the Soviet mass consciousness. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 3, 124. (in Russian).
Rancier, J. (2006). On the edge of the political. M.: Praxis, 190.
Toshchenko, J.T., Tsvetkova, G.A. (2006). Have the problems of local government changed over the past 10 years? Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 8, 78-87. (in Russian).
Toshchenko, J.T., Tsvetkova, G.A. (1997). Local self-government: problems of formation. Mestnoe samoupravlenie, 109-119. (in Russian).
Fedulov, A.M. (2014). Conservative values in the socio-cultural transformation of modern Russian society. (Candidate Dissertation, Moscow).
Hjel, L., Ziegler, D. (2001). Personality Theory. St. Petersburg: Piter.
Shubart, V. (2000). Europe and the soul of the East. M., 45-76.
Yaremenko, S.N. (2008). Meanings and lifestyles as markers of human identity. Rostov-on-Don, 125-135.
Arrow, K.J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens pratique. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. In The Journal of Political Economy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 135-150.
Fromm, E. (1992). The revision of psychoanalysis. Boulder etc.: Westview press.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. In Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Unit 2. Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Subunit 1. Conceptual Issues in Psychology and Culture. Available at: http:// scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Ritzer, G. (2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. N.Y.: Macmillan.
Skinner, B.F. (1981). Selection by consequences. In Science. New Series, 213, 4507, 501-504.
Gorshkov, M.K. (2016). Russian society as it is (experience of sociological diagnostics): in 2 vol. 2nd ed. M.: Novyj hronograf.
Degtyarev, A.K., Shcherbakova, L.I. (2013). Political behavior: interpretation in the sociological view of M. Weber and P. Bourdieu. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye znaniya, 7, 63-69. (in Russian).
Ilyin, V.V., Panarin, A.S., Badovsky, D.V. (1995). Political anthropology. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University.
Kara-Murza, S.G. (2009). State paternalism – civilizational dimension. Nauchnyj jekspert, 12, 16-25. (in Russian).
Kara-Murza, S.G. (2013). Russia and the West: Paradigms of civilizations. M.: Akad. proekt, 98-119.
Lubsky, V.A., Atoyan, S.M., Bespalova, A.A., Vyalykh, N.A., Kolesnikova, E.Yu., Krupennikova, L.S., Lubskiy, R.A., Serikov, A.V., Tereshchenko, A.A., Chernobrovkina, N.I. (2016). Mental programs and models of social behavior in Russian society. Rostov-on-Don: Science and Education Foundation.
Lubsky, V.A., Bespalova, A.A., Voitenko V.P., Vyalykh, N.A., Zaytseva A.A., Kolesnikova, E.Yu., Krupennikova, L.S., Lubskiy, R.A., Serikov, Chernobrovkina (2017). Mental programs and modal models of social behavior the South of Russia. M.: Socio-humanitarian knowledge, 2017.
Lubsky, A.V., Lubsky, R.A. (2013). Etatism and paternalism as cultural markers of civilizational identity in Russia. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 3, 90-103. (in Russian).
Lubsky, R.A. (2012). Statehood and paternalism in Russia. Filosofija prava, 6 (55), 19-21. (in Russian).
Obolonsky, A.V. (1991). Conservative syndrome in the Soviet mass consciousness. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 3, 124. (in Russian).
Rancier, J. (2006). On the edge of the political. M.: Praxis, 190.
Toshchenko, J.T., Tsvetkova, G.A. (2006). Have the problems of local government changed over the past 10 years? Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 8, 78-87. (in Russian).
Toshchenko, J.T., Tsvetkova, G.A. (1997). Local self-government: problems of formation. Mestnoe samoupravlenie, 109-119. (in Russian).
Fedulov, A.M. (2014). Conservative values in the socio-cultural transformation of modern Russian society. (Candidate Dissertation, Moscow).
Hjel, L., Ziegler, D. (2001). Personality Theory. St. Petersburg: Piter.
Shubart, V. (2000). Europe and the soul of the East. M., 45-76.
Yaremenko, S.N. (2008). Meanings and lifestyles as markers of human identity. Rostov-on-Don, 125-135.
Arrow, K.J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens pratique. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. In The Journal of Political Economy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 135-150.
Fromm, E. (1992). The revision of psychoanalysis. Boulder etc.: Westview press.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. In Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Unit 2. Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Subunit 1. Conceptual Issues in Psychology and Culture. Available at: http:// scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Ritzer, G. (2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. N.Y.: Macmillan.
Skinner, B.F. (1981). Selection by consequences. In Science. New Series, 213, 4507, 501-504.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Gromakova, V. G., Shevchenko, O. N., & Usencova, E. A. (2019). The Tactics of Social Behavior of Young People in the South of Russia in the Political Sphere in Terms of Socio-Political Frustration. Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(2), 148-165. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.2.11
Section
SOCIO-POLITICAL AND ETHNICAL PROCESSES IN THE SOUTH OF RUSSIA
