Archaization as a Factor of Social Behavior and Interpersonal Relations

  • Elena An. Agapova Institute of Philosophy and Socio-political Sciences of the Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don eagapova@sfedu.ru
  • Aleksey P. Sitnikov Южно-Российский гуманитарный институт, г. Ростов-на-Дону isir-sfedu@yandex.ru
  • Elena E. Emirbekova Southern Federal University; branch of the Southern Federal University in Makhachkala elena_1980@mail.ru
How to Cite
Agapova E.A., Sitnikov A.P., Emirbekova E.E. Archaization as a Factor of Social Behavior and Interpersonal Relations. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 194-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.3.20 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The article deals with the processes of archaization, acting as a factor that transforms the social behavior of individuals and features of interpersonal communication. Archaizational component is observed at the level of household behavior, showing its presence in different orientations in social practices and cultural meanings of the archaic in terms of social transformation, as well as the loss of a sense of trust in primitivism, the coarsening and the "barbarization" of behavior. Interpersonal communication in modern society is characterized by simplification of language practices, widespread dissemination of obscene slang, loss of previously accepted standards of General culture and etc.
Keywords:
archaization, social behavior, interpersonal relations, primitivization, simplification, transformation

Author Biographies

Elena An. Agapova, Institute of Philosophy and Socio-political Sciences of the Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Profesor,Head of the Department of Social Philoophy 
Aleksey P. Sitnikov, Южно-Российский гуманитарный институт, г. Ростов-на-Дону
 Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor,South-Russian Instituteof Humanities,Rostov-on-Don
Elena E. Emirbekova, Southern Federal University; branch of the Southern Federal University in Makhachkala
Candidate of Law, Associate Professor of department of State Law; Director of the branch of the Southern Federal University in Makhachkala

References

Bauman, Z. (2002). Individualized society. M.: Logos.



Boykov, I. (2011). Moral recovery as a way to national survival. Available at: http: // www.apn.ru.



Danilenko, V. Great, mighty and... vulgar. Available at: http://www.1ych.ru.



Kovalev, V.V. (2014). The dialogue between government and society (comparative analysis). Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya, 2, 3. (in Russian).



Kolev, A.N. (2003). Political mythology. M.



Kostomarov, V.G. (1994). Language taste of the era. From observations on speech practice of the mass media. M.: Zlatoust.



Melikhov, A. (2006). Who is degenerating - language or society? Nevskoye vremya, May 24. (in Russian).



Mironova, P.O. (2003). The strategy of reductionism in modern political discourse: a cognitive-pragmatic aspect. (Abstract, Candidate Dissertation, Omsk).



Smolin, A. (2011). Chanson as a means of social degradation. Available at: http://ria.ru/2011/.



Shakhbanova, M.M., Lysenko, Yu.M. (2018). Ethnic identity of mountain Jews: cultural attitudes and autostereotypes. Gosudarstvennoye i munitsipal'noye upravleniye. Uchenyye zapiski, 4, 235-241. (in Russian).



Yurevich, A.V., Ushakov, D.V. (2009). Morality in Modern Russia. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya, 1 (3). (in Russian).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Agapova, E. A., Sitnikov, A. P., & Emirbekova, E. E. (2019). Archaization as a Factor of Social Behavior and Interpersonal Relations. Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(3), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.3.20
Section
SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN MODERN SOCIETY