Methodological Aspects of Professional Dynasties Research in Russian Society
How to Cite
Mostovaya I.V., Posukhova O.Y., Klimenko L.V. Methodological Aspects of Professional Dynasties Research in Russian Society. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 6. P. 70-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.6.3 (in Russ.).
Abstract
In Russian society the methodological study construct of professional dynasties is based on: 1) the premise of the dynasty model as a reproduction professional monopoly mechanism, which is based on primordial characteristics; 2) the assessment of professional dynasties as an archaic construct of securing advantages in social competition; 3) dynasties presuppose the formation and reproduction of micro-local networks in the professional sphere and the specific mechanisms of status capital transmission; 4) in the context of structural and functional transformations, destruction and replacement of social institutions in the society, dynastic succession often takes place not on a professional, but on a kratic basis; 5) the accumulated and transmittable status capital allows dynasty's representatives to carry out transprofessional mobility; 6) in a society the socio-economic potential of professional dynasties is ambivalent and manifests itself at the socio-structural, institutional and socio-cultural levels; 7) in professional dynasties the transmission of social positions can be typologized on the basis of activity/passivity of status inheritance and horizontal/vertical socio-professional advancement.
Keywords:
professional dynasties, transfer of social capital, professional succession, status transmission, socio-professional monopoly, transprofessional mobility
References
Berto, D., Berto-Vyam, I. (1992). Inheritance and gender: translation and social mobility for five generations. Voprosy sociologii, 1, 2. (in Russian).
Berto, D., Berto-Vyam, I. (1993). Family ownership and family: continuity and social mobility, traced over five generations. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2. (in Russian).
Baudrillard, J. (2006). Consumer Society. Its myths and structure. M.: Culturnaya Revolutsiya, Republica.
Baudrillard, J. (2002). Symbolic exchange and death. M.: Dobrosvet.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). Reproduction strategies and methods of domination. Sociology of social space. M.; St. Petersburg.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Forms of Capital. Economicheskaya sociologiya, 3, 5. (in Russian).
Gudkov, L.D. (2016). The Story of a Soviet Man. Vedomosti. December, 28. Available at: http: // www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/ articles/2016/12/28/671519-povest-o-sovetskom.
Galbraith, J. (2004). The New Industrial Society. M.: AST, Transitkniga; St. Petersburg: Terra Fantastica.
Identity: socio-psychological and socio-philosophical aspects (2012). Sci. ed. K.V. Patyrbaeva. Perm: PSNIU.
Engineering Dynasties of Russia (2017). Sci. ed. V.A. Mansurov. M.: ROS.
Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age. Economics, society and culture. M.: SU-HSE.
Markuse, G. (2011). Critical theory of society: Selected works on philosophy and social criticism. M.: AST, Astrel.
Mostovaya, I.V. (1995). Social stratification in Russia: research methodology. Rostov-on-Don.
Mostovaya, I.V. (1997). Social Stratification: The Symbolic Meta-Game World. Textbook allowance. M.: Mechanic.
Mostovaya, I.V. (1995). Social communities in the process of restructuring Russian society. Rostov-on-Don.
Mukhametshina. E. (2017). “We realized that the Soviet people does not go anywhere”: Interview with L.D. Gudkov. Vedomosti. July, 27. Available at: https:// www.vedomosti.ru/politics/characters/2017/07/24/725468-sovetskii-chelovek.
Posukhova, O.Yu. (2013). Professional dynasty as a result of family strategies: inertia or continuity? Vlast’, 12. (in Russian).
Posukhova, O.Yu. (2018). The role of professional dynasties in the academic environment of Russian society. Vlast’, 7. (in Russian).
Radaev, V.V. (2019). Millennials: How Russian society is changing. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.
Radaev, V.V. (2018). Millennials against the background of previous generations: an empirical analysis. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 3. (in Russian).
Tikhonova, N.E. (2014). The social structure of Russia: theory and reality. M.: New Chronograph: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Science.
Tkach, O.A. (2008). Factory dynasty as a socio-cultural phenomenon: Soviet and post-Soviet periods. (Abstract, Candidate Dissertation, Sociological Institute, RAS, St. Petersburg).
Shkaratan, O.I., Yastrebov, G.A. (2011). A comparative analysis of the processes of social mobility in the USSR and modern Russia. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2. (in Russian).
Black, S.E., Devereux, P.J., Salvanes, K.G. (2005). Why the Apple Doesn’t Fall Far: Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital. American Economic Review, 95 (1), 435-447.
Carmen A., Cheti N. (2018). The intergenerational transmission of liberal professions. Labour Economics, 51.
Dustmann, C. (2004). Parental background, secondary school, track choice, and wages. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 209-230.
Eberharter, V.V. (2012). The Intergenerational Transmission of Occupational Preferences, Segregation, and Wage Inequality: Empirical Evidence from three Countries. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, 506, 25 p.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J.H. (1992). The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford University Press, USA.
Kramarz, F., Skans, S. (2014). When Strong Ties are Strong: Networks and Youth Labour Market Entry. Review of Economic Studies, 81, 3, 1164-1200.
Offe, C. (1976). Industry and Inequality. The Achievement Principle in Work and Social Status. London: Edward Arnold.
Parkin, F. (1979). Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. Columbia University Press.
Parkin, F. (1974). Strategies of Social Closure in Class Formation. The Social Analysis of the Class Structure. F. Parkin (Ed.). London: Tavistock.
Ponzo, M., Scoppa, V. (2010). The use of informal networks in Italy: Efficiency or favoritism? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 1, 89-99.
Roszak, Th. (1986). The Cult of information: The folklore of computers and the true art of thinking. New York.
Social Mobility in Europe (2004). R. Breen (Ed.) Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Berto, D., Berto-Vyam, I. (1993). Family ownership and family: continuity and social mobility, traced over five generations. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2. (in Russian).
Baudrillard, J. (2006). Consumer Society. Its myths and structure. M.: Culturnaya Revolutsiya, Republica.
Baudrillard, J. (2002). Symbolic exchange and death. M.: Dobrosvet.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). Reproduction strategies and methods of domination. Sociology of social space. M.; St. Petersburg.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Forms of Capital. Economicheskaya sociologiya, 3, 5. (in Russian).
Gudkov, L.D. (2016). The Story of a Soviet Man. Vedomosti. December, 28. Available at: http: // www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/ articles/2016/12/28/671519-povest-o-sovetskom.
Galbraith, J. (2004). The New Industrial Society. M.: AST, Transitkniga; St. Petersburg: Terra Fantastica.
Identity: socio-psychological and socio-philosophical aspects (2012). Sci. ed. K.V. Patyrbaeva. Perm: PSNIU.
Engineering Dynasties of Russia (2017). Sci. ed. V.A. Mansurov. M.: ROS.
Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age. Economics, society and culture. M.: SU-HSE.
Markuse, G. (2011). Critical theory of society: Selected works on philosophy and social criticism. M.: AST, Astrel.
Mostovaya, I.V. (1995). Social stratification in Russia: research methodology. Rostov-on-Don.
Mostovaya, I.V. (1997). Social Stratification: The Symbolic Meta-Game World. Textbook allowance. M.: Mechanic.
Mostovaya, I.V. (1995). Social communities in the process of restructuring Russian society. Rostov-on-Don.
Mukhametshina. E. (2017). “We realized that the Soviet people does not go anywhere”: Interview with L.D. Gudkov. Vedomosti. July, 27. Available at: https:// www.vedomosti.ru/politics/characters/2017/07/24/725468-sovetskii-chelovek.
Posukhova, O.Yu. (2013). Professional dynasty as a result of family strategies: inertia or continuity? Vlast’, 12. (in Russian).
Posukhova, O.Yu. (2018). The role of professional dynasties in the academic environment of Russian society. Vlast’, 7. (in Russian).
Radaev, V.V. (2019). Millennials: How Russian society is changing. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.
Radaev, V.V. (2018). Millennials against the background of previous generations: an empirical analysis. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 3. (in Russian).
Tikhonova, N.E. (2014). The social structure of Russia: theory and reality. M.: New Chronograph: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Science.
Tkach, O.A. (2008). Factory dynasty as a socio-cultural phenomenon: Soviet and post-Soviet periods. (Abstract, Candidate Dissertation, Sociological Institute, RAS, St. Petersburg).
Shkaratan, O.I., Yastrebov, G.A. (2011). A comparative analysis of the processes of social mobility in the USSR and modern Russia. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2. (in Russian).
Black, S.E., Devereux, P.J., Salvanes, K.G. (2005). Why the Apple Doesn’t Fall Far: Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital. American Economic Review, 95 (1), 435-447.
Carmen A., Cheti N. (2018). The intergenerational transmission of liberal professions. Labour Economics, 51.
Dustmann, C. (2004). Parental background, secondary school, track choice, and wages. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 209-230.
Eberharter, V.V. (2012). The Intergenerational Transmission of Occupational Preferences, Segregation, and Wage Inequality: Empirical Evidence from three Countries. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, 506, 25 p.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J.H. (1992). The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford University Press, USA.
Kramarz, F., Skans, S. (2014). When Strong Ties are Strong: Networks and Youth Labour Market Entry. Review of Economic Studies, 81, 3, 1164-1200.
Offe, C. (1976). Industry and Inequality. The Achievement Principle in Work and Social Status. London: Edward Arnold.
Parkin, F. (1979). Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. Columbia University Press.
Parkin, F. (1974). Strategies of Social Closure in Class Formation. The Social Analysis of the Class Structure. F. Parkin (Ed.). London: Tavistock.
Ponzo, M., Scoppa, V. (2010). The use of informal networks in Italy: Efficiency or favoritism? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 1, 89-99.
Roszak, Th. (1986). The Cult of information: The folklore of computers and the true art of thinking. New York.
Social Mobility in Europe (2004). R. Breen (Ed.) Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Mostovaya, I. V., Posukhova, O. Y., & Klimenko, L. V. (2019). Methodological Aspects of Professional Dynasties Research in Russian Society. Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(6), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.6.3
Section
MODERN RUSSIAN SOCIETY
