Individualistic and Collectivistic Election of Personality as a Phenomenon of Socio-Cultural Identification

  • Elena B. Baboshina Kurgan State University, Kurgan ebaboshina@rambler.ru
  • Tatyana I. Ekimova Kurgan State University, Kurgan kgu_pf@mail.ru
How to Cite
Baboshina E.B., Ekimova T.I. Individualistic and Collectivistic Election of Personality as a Phenomenon of Socio-Cultural Identification. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 6. P. 89-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.6.5 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze students' personal choices in the alternative individualism - collectivism. The article contains sample’s analysis of the value positions of the modern personality on the issue of the leading cultural syndrome. The theoretical message for the study was the works of H. Triandis, as well as the works of N.M. Lebedeva on the socio-cultural characteristics of different types of societies. Over the past decades, qualitative changes at all its levels have occurred in Russia, that have influenced on important positions in personal identification. The empirical method of study was a test survey of leading value preferences of individualism - collectivism dilemma. The survey was compiled by one of the authors of the article Helen B. Baboshina. The questions take into account individualistic and collectivistic differences (twenty value alternatives) by asking for “your choice”. The analysis of the survey results is reflected in the article.In the interpretation of the features of socio-cultural identity, the authors rely on domestic researchers investigating the socio-cultural development of Russia (V. V. Kovalev (2015), A.V. Lubsky (2013, 2014), A. R. Lubsky (2014), M. K. Gorshkov (2012, 2013, 2019), others); the analysis also involves the works of classics of sociology, philosophy (E. Durkheim, T. Parsons). The study of identification taking into account domestic and general trends of social development showed typical for the present value positions of the emerging personality. The interpretation of the data takes into account the peculiarity of the respondents ' contingent in two components: territorial (TRANS-Urals) and professional (future and working teachers, education managers, teachers - psychologists; mostly-representatives of the female sex) components. As a result, the understanding of the new interaction of the features of mentality with the actual value choice of the person, where the peculiarity of the professional sphere of respondents suggests the likely consolidation of the “value climate” in the next generation, is formulated.
Keywords:
individualism, collectivism, identification, value choice, polyculture, socio-cultural space of personality formation

Author Biographies

Elena B. Baboshina, Kurgan State University, Kurgan
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Master of Philosophy, Department of Pedagogy and Methodology of Teaching Humanities 
Tatyana I. Ekimova, Kurgan State University, Kurgan
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Pedagogy and Methodology of Teaching Humanities

References

Baboshina, E.B. (2006). Individualistic and collectivistic positions of students as an expression of the mentality of the Russian society. Philosophical understanding of the theory and practice of modern professional education: Appendix to the journal "Filosofiya obrazovaniya". A. Zh. Zhafyarov, N. V. Nalivayko, V. I. Parshikov (Eds.). Novosibirsk, vol. XVIII, 115-125. (in Russian).



Baboshina, E. B. (2001). Collectivistic and individualistic tendencies of modern education. Lichnost' v sovremennom mire: Mat. Conf. April 24-25, Kurgan, 3-8. (in Russian).



Baboshina, E. B. (2006). Value orientations of multicultural education and principles of individualism and collectivism. Filosofiya obrazovaniya, 2, 331-337. (in Russian).



Baeva, L.V. (2004). Values of the changing world: Existential axiology of history. Astrakhan.



Baudrillard, J. (2000). In the shadow of the silent majority, or the End of the social. Trans. from French N.V. Suslov. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo YurGU.



Veselova, V.V. (1999). Mentality of American society and humanistic paradigm of education and upbringing. Pedagogika, 8, 91-100. (in Russian).



Gorshkov, K.M. (2019). Russian youth: to the history and role in modern society. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 8 (38), 4, 16-24. (in Russian).



Gorshkov, M.K., Tikhonova, N.E. (2013). Sociocultural factors of consolidation of the Russian society. Moscow: In-t sotsiologii RAN.



Gorshkov, M.K., Sheregi, F.E. (2012). Russian youth: the origins and stages of sociological study. Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii, 3, 23-46. (in Russian).



Twenty years of reforms through the eyes of Russians (experience of long-term sociological measurements) (2011). Analytical report. Moscow.



Durkheim, E. (1994). Suicide: a sociological study. Moscow.



Identity of modern Russia: crisis of values, search of meanings and ways of structuring: Round table (2012). Ved. Round table S.V. Ivanov, V.D. Nechaev, T.V. Evgeneva. Tsennosti i smysly, 5 (21), 10-26. (in Russian).



Ionin, L.G. (1998). Sociology of culture: textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow: Logos.



Kovalev, V. V. (2015). Role and value of axiological stereotypes for formation of stability of development of social institutions of the Russian society. Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii, 1, 60-69. (in Russian).



Kozhevnikova, T.M. (2012). On the nature of Russian collectivism. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye yavleniya i protsessy, 2, 75-77. (in Russian).



Lebedeva, N.M. (2000). Basic values of Russians at the turn of the XXI century. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 21 (3), 73-87. (in Russian).



Lebedeva, N.M. (1999). Introduction to ethnic and cross-cultural psychology: textbook. Moscow.



Levashov, V.K. (2015). Reflections on a new book. The phantoms of our lives (Institute of social-polit. research. RAS) Available at: socioprognoz.ru›files/File/2015/Tosh/levashov. pdf.



Lubsky, A.V. (2014). Discourses on national and civilizational identities in Russiaю Nauchnaya mysl' Kavkaza, 2014, 2, 24-32. (in Russian).



Lubskij, A.V., Lubskij, R.A. (2013). Etatism and paternalism as cultural markers of civilizational identity in Russia. Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii, 3, 90-103. (in Russian).



Murav'ev, I.B. (1998). Existential dialogue in modern mentality (Candidate Dissertation, Tyumen).



Nemchina, V.I. (2016). Russian experience of identity formation in society of transitional type. Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii, 2 (18), 58-65. (in Russian).



Nikandrov, N.D. (2000). Russia: socialization and education at the turn of the Millennium. Moscow: Pedagogical society of Russia.



Parsons, T. (2002). On social systems. Moscow.



Polezhaev, D. V. (2003). The Idea of mentality in the Russian philosophy of the "Golden age". Volgograd: Izdatel’stvo VolGU.



Russia and China: youth of the XXI century, 2014. M. K. Gorshkov, Li Chunlin, Z. T. Golenkova, P. M. Kozyrev (Eds.). M.: Novyy khronograf.



Svasyan, K. A. (1987). Man as a creation and creator of culture. Vopr. filosofii, 6.



Serebryaniy, A.Y. (1999). East Asian civilization: from the beginning to the end of the XIX century. Volgograd: Peremena, 8.



Triandis, G. (2003). Individualism and collectivism: past, present and future. Psychology and culture. Translated from English. D. Matsumoto (Ed.). SPb.: Peter.



Triandis, G. (2007). Culture and social behavior. M.: Forum..



Heidegger, M. (1997). Introduction to metaphysics. Trans. from German N.O. Gucinskaya. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola.



Chernaya, L.A. (1999). "New philosophical anthropology" by M. Scheler and the history of culture. Voprosy filosofii, 7. 127-140. (in Russian).



Yadov, V. A. (1999). Russia as a transforming society: summary of the long-term discussion of sociologists. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 10-11, 65-72. (in Russian).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Baboshina, E. B., & Ekimova, T. I. (2019). Individualistic and Collectivistic Election of Personality as a Phenomenon of Socio-Cultural Identification. Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(6), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.6.5
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY