Archaization of the Russian Society in the Focus of Scientific Research Practices and Methodological Parameters of Research

  • Aleksey P. Sitnikov South-Russian Institute of Humanities, Rostov-on-Don urgi@urgi.info
How to Cite
Sitnikov A.P. Archaization of the Russian Society in the Focus of Scientific Research Practices and Methodological Parameters of Research. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 91-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/2227-8656.2020.1.6 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The article analyzes the scientific potential of the study of such an important phenomenon for the modern world as archaization, on the basis of which the author's methodological and conceptual space for the socio-philosophical study of the archaization of Russian society is formed. The concept of the plurality of modernity, and therefore the alternatives to national modernization, is recognized as a conceptual position. In the framework of the proposed concept, archaization, traditionalization and modernization are considered as modes of tradition - a substance of the sociocultural system that ensures reproduction and preservation of the society’s culture. Under the influence of socio-cultural transformation, the tradition can take the form of these processes, depending on the degree of destruction of traditional foundations and bases of society's life and the adequacy of the implemented innovations, their organic socio-cultural roots. Archaization as a modus of tradition, in turn, under the influence of sociocultural transformation, can develop in the format (modus) of rearchaization and neoarchaization as a result of interaction with the processes of traditionalization and modernization. At the intersection of the development trajectories of modernization and traditionalization processes, a modus of development called neotraditionalization is formed. The modes of archaization (neoarchaization and rearchization) affect the development of social processes in different ways, and therefore archaization is not considered as a uniquely regressive process.
Keywords:
archaization, traditionalization, modernization, tradition, rearchaization, neoarchaization, neotraditionalization, sociocultural transformation, Russian society

Author Biography

Aleksey P. Sitnikov, South-Russian Institute of Humanities, Rostov-on-Don
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

References

Abdrakhmanov, D.M., Buranchin, A.M. (2014). Destructive aspects of social transformations: anomie, archaic, deviation. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya, 3 (19), 94-101. (in Russian).



Akhiezer, A.S. (2001). Archaization in Russian society as a methodological problem. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost', 2, 89-100. (in Russian).



Achkasov, V.A. (1997). “Exploding archaism”: traditionalism in the political life of Russia. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGU. (in Russian).



Vorobev, G.A., Kumykov, A.M., Khunagov, R.D., Tarasenko, L.V. (2019). Archaization and non-traditionalization of social behavior in the South of Russia in the coordinates of social consolidation. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye znaniya, 7, 86-94. (in Russian).



Hoffman, A.B. (2007). Problems of tradition in the work of Emil Durkheim. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 4, 63-73. (in Russian).



Hoffman, A.B. (1998). Traditions. Culturology. XX century. Encyclopedia in 2 volumes. S.Ya. Levit (Ed.). SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2. (in Russian).



Granin, Yu.D. (2017). West and alternative modernization strategies. Vek globalizatsii, 3, 17-30. (in Russian).



Delyagin, M.G. (2008). The drive of humanity. Globalization and the global crisis. M.: Veche. (in Russian).



Dibirov, A.-N.Z. (2014). Dagestan today: archaization, or the protracted crisis of traditional society. Islamovedeniye, 1, 91-98. (in Russian).



Zarubina, N.N. (2013). On theoretical approaches to studies of modernization of Russia in a complex society. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, 1. (in Russian).



Zarubina, N.N. (2013). The simplification of mass social practices as a vector of transformation of everyday life in a complex society. Istoricheskaya psikhologiya i sotsiologiya istorii, 2, 29-45. (in Russian).



Zvyagelskaya, I. (2016). Archaization in the Arab World: after and instead of revolutions. Rossiya i musul'manskiy mir, 2 (284), 138-157. (in Russian).



Isakov, A.L., Ermolenko, V.V. (2011). Modeling the archaization of the political process as a methodological problem of socio-humanitarian knowledge. IVD, 3, 385-389. (in Russian).



Karnaushenko, L.V. (2016). The Institute of Law in the aspect of the processes of archaization and modernization of modern society. Vestnik KRU MVD Rossii, 2 (32), 88-92. (in Russian).



Klimenko, L.V. (2013). Gender dispositions in the modern North Caucasian family: modernization or archaization. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve, 1, 20-31. (in Russian).



Kozyuk, M.N. (2017). Mediation between archaic and modern. Filosofiya prava, 3 (82), 123-129. (in Russian).



Kopaev, E.N. (2017). The problem of archaization of consciousness of the Russian ruling elite. Vlast’, 1, 25-27. (in Russian).



Lamazhaa, Ch.K. (2011). Archaization of society during the period of social transformations. Gumanitarnyye nauki: teoriya i metodologiya, 3, 35-42. (in Russian).



Lamazhaa, Ch.K. (2013). Archaization of society. Tuvan phenomenon. M.: Librocom. (in Russian).



Lamazhaa, Ch.K. (2010). Archaization, traditionalism and neotraditionalism. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye, 2, 88-93. (in Russian).



Lamazhaa, Ch.K. (2013). Concepts of the archaization of society in domestic social science. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye, 4, 33-41. (in Russian).



Lamazhaa, Ch.K., Abdulaeva, M.Sh. (2014). Archaization and neotraditionalism: Russian regional forms. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye, 3, 68-80. (in Russian).



Lapin, N.I. (2011). Sociocultural factors of Russian stagnation and modernization. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 9, 3-17. (in Russian).



Marinenko, Ya.S. (2017). The tendency to archaize Russian public consciousness in the light of the actions of Alexander Brener and Pussy Riot. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta, 420, 105-107. (in Russian).



Matetskaya, A.V. (2015). The problem of archaization of post-Soviet culture. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul'tury, 208, 2. (in Russian).



Medova, A.A. To the problem of the existence of the concept of “modality” in modern humanitarian and philosophical knowledge. Available at: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-prob leme-bytovaniya-ponyatiya-modalnost-v-sovre mennom-gumanitarnom-i-filosofskom-znanii.



Ostanina, O.A. New philosophical encyclopedia. Available at: https:// gufo.me/ dict/philosophy_encyclopedia/%D0%9C%D0%9E%D0%94%D0%A3%D0%A1.



Pleis, Ya.A. (2009). Total systemic modernization is an absolute imperative for Russia. Vlast’, 8, 3-10. (in Russian).



Polyakov, L.V. (1998). Russia's path to modernity: modernization as dearchaization. M. (in Russian).



Pomortseva, A.M. (2009). Civilization fault (challenge) and archaization of human consciousness (response). Nauka. Innovatsii. Tekhnologii, 2, 44-50. (in Russian).



Pusko, V.S., Skvortsov, N.G., Kurbatov, V.I., Shcherbakova, L.I., Vaskov, M.A. (2019). Innovative and inertial processes in the development of Russian regions in the context of the archaization of society: problems of modeling and management. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye znaniya, 7, 36-44. (in Russian).



Revutskaya, E.A. (2013). Archaization in the Russian sociocultural process. Gramota, 4 (30), 150-153. (in Russian).



Sergeev, D.V. (2011). The processes of archaization in totalitarian Soviet culture. Gumanitarnyy vektor, 2. (in Russian).



Sergeev, D.V. (2012). The socio-cultural situation in Russia at the beginning of the 21st century: recurrent culture, archaization, invented archaism. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 3, 100-118. (in Russian).



Skvortsov, N.G., Kumykov, A.M., Pusko, V.S., Agapova, E.A. (2019). Demonstrative consumption in the conditions of archaization of Russian society. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye znaniya, 7, 110-117. (in Russian).



Sycheva, T.M. (2018). The problem of archaization: some methodological approaches. Manuskript, 5 (91). (in Russian).



Tarasov, A.N. (2016). Mechanisms of cultural dynamics in the process of sociocultural transformation. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura, 5, 26-29. (in Russian).



Fedotova, V.G. (2012). Archaization in the modern world. Filosofskiye nauki, 5, 26-36. (in Russian).



Fedotova, V.G. (2005). Good society. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. (in Russian).



Khachaturian, V.M. (2009). “Second Life” of the archaic: archaic tendencies in the civilization process. M. (in Russian).



Khoruzhaya, S.V., Salchinkina, A.R. (2017). Archaization and degradation in the socio-cultural space. Manuskript, 5 (79), 194-196. (in Russian).



Khupeniya, N.R. (2016). The semantic diversity of the concept of tradition. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, 2. (in Russian).



Chirina, A.A. (2007). Archaization of mass consciousness in the conditions of a transforming society. Vestnik Mordovskogo un-ta, 2, 37-41. (in Russian).



Shtompel, L.A., Shtompel, O.M. (2010). Archaization of modern culture: necessity or chance? Tsennosti i smysly, 1 (4). (in Russian).



Shtompka, P. (2013). Modernization as a social formation (10 theses on modernization). Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, 6 (30), 119–126. (in Russian).



Shtompka, P. (1996). Sociology of social change. M.: Aspect Press. (in Russian).



Eisenstadt, S.N. (1999). Multiple Modernities in an Age of Globalization. Grenzenlose Gesellschaft, 1, 37-50.



Radin, M. (1949). Tradition. Encyclopedia of social sciences. New York, XV, 62-67.
Article

Received: 07.10.2019

Accepted: 03.03.2020

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Sitnikov, A. P. (2020). Archaization of the Russian Society in the Focus of Scientific Research Practices and Methodological Parameters of Research. Humanities of the South of Russia, 9(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.19181/2227-8656.2020.1.6
Section
MODERN RUSSIAN SOCIETY