On the Importance of Spiritual Production in the Development of Modern Humanitarian Knowledge
Research Article
How to Cite
Lipchanskaya I.V. On the Importance of Spiritual Production in the Development of Modern Humanitarian Knowledge. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 177-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2020.3.13 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article considers aspects of the activity of the scientific elite related to the spiritual production of a special kind − the production of new scientific knowledge. The development of the value-moral foundations of our predecessors proceeds at the time of the spiritual crisis. Under these conditions, the spiritual culture of society manifests itself, that is reflected in the production and development of new spiritual values. Spirituality is the basis of social creativity only when it is actualized in creative work, which is a universal way of implementing social creativity of the individual. In the structure of human nature, it is spirituality that historically determines the anthropological integrity and essence of man himself, determines the highest manifestations of his sociality, which is facilitated by the integration and systematization of humanitarian knowledge.
Keywords:
scientific elite, spiritual production, social practices, the scientific community, spiritual culture, humanism, scientific school, reflection
References
Weber, M. (1991). Science as a vocation and profession. Samosoznaniye yevropeyskoy kul'tury XX veka. Moscow: Politizdat, 130-149. (in Russian).
Hegel, G. (1934). Compositions. In 14 vol. Moscow; Leningrad, 7. (in Russian).
Gobozov, I.A. (2007). Social Philosophy: textbook for High Schools. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt. (in Russian).
Gorokhov, V.G. (2010). How are science and scientific education possible in the era of “academic” capitalism? Voprosy filosofii, 10, 3-13. (in Russian).
Kant, I. (1963-1966). Compositions in 6 volumes. Moscow, 3. (in Russian).
Kiyashchenko, N.I. (2010). Civil society culture. Voprosy filosofii, 10, 62-66. (in Russian).
Comte, O. (1971). Positive Philosophy Course. Antologiya mirovoy filosofii. In 4 vols, 3. (in Russian).
Krapivensky, S.E. (1996). Social philosophy. Volgograd. (in Russian).
Leshkevich, T.G. (2008). Philosophy of science: textbook. Moscow: INFRA-M. (in Russian).
Lipchanskaya, I.V. (2011). Genesis of the scientific elite (socio-philosophical analysis). Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co, Germany. (in Russian).
Lukov, V.A. The mission of the intelligentsia in modern Russian society. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. Available at: http:// www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/. (in Russian).
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1980). Compositions. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka, 3. (in Russian).
Mikeshina, L.A. (2006). Transcendental dimensions of humanitarian knowledge. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 49-66. (in Russian).
Petrov, M.K. (1992). Self-awareness and scientific creativity. Rostov-on-Don: Mysl’. (in Russian).
Polani, M. (1985). Personal knowledge. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian).
Stepin, V.S. (1976). The formation of scientific theory. Minsk: Nauka. (in Russian).
Holton, J. (1992). What is Antiscience. Voprosy filosofii, 2, 121-128. (in Russian).
Fichte, I.G. (1971). General principles of science. Antologiya mirovoy filosofii. In 4 vol., 3. (in Russian).
Hübner, K. (1982). Über verschiedene Zeitbegriffe in Alltag, Physik und Mythos. In F.M. Korff (Hrsg.), Redliches Denken. Festschrift für G.-G. Grau, Stuttgart.
Hegel, G. (1934). Compositions. In 14 vol. Moscow; Leningrad, 7. (in Russian).
Gobozov, I.A. (2007). Social Philosophy: textbook for High Schools. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt. (in Russian).
Gorokhov, V.G. (2010). How are science and scientific education possible in the era of “academic” capitalism? Voprosy filosofii, 10, 3-13. (in Russian).
Kant, I. (1963-1966). Compositions in 6 volumes. Moscow, 3. (in Russian).
Kiyashchenko, N.I. (2010). Civil society culture. Voprosy filosofii, 10, 62-66. (in Russian).
Comte, O. (1971). Positive Philosophy Course. Antologiya mirovoy filosofii. In 4 vols, 3. (in Russian).
Krapivensky, S.E. (1996). Social philosophy. Volgograd. (in Russian).
Leshkevich, T.G. (2008). Philosophy of science: textbook. Moscow: INFRA-M. (in Russian).
Lipchanskaya, I.V. (2011). Genesis of the scientific elite (socio-philosophical analysis). Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co, Germany. (in Russian).
Lukov, V.A. The mission of the intelligentsia in modern Russian society. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. Available at: http:// www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/. (in Russian).
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1980). Compositions. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka, 3. (in Russian).
Mikeshina, L.A. (2006). Transcendental dimensions of humanitarian knowledge. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 49-66. (in Russian).
Petrov, M.K. (1992). Self-awareness and scientific creativity. Rostov-on-Don: Mysl’. (in Russian).
Polani, M. (1985). Personal knowledge. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian).
Stepin, V.S. (1976). The formation of scientific theory. Minsk: Nauka. (in Russian).
Holton, J. (1992). What is Antiscience. Voprosy filosofii, 2, 121-128. (in Russian).
Fichte, I.G. (1971). General principles of science. Antologiya mirovoy filosofii. In 4 vol., 3. (in Russian).
Hübner, K. (1982). Über verschiedene Zeitbegriffe in Alltag, Physik und Mythos. In F.M. Korff (Hrsg.), Redliches Denken. Festschrift für G.-G. Grau, Stuttgart.
Article
Received: 30.04.2020
Accepted: 18.07.2020
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Lipchanskaya, I. V. (2020). On the Importance of Spiritual Production in the Development of Modern Humanitarian Knowledge. Humanities of the South of Russia, 9(3), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2020.3.13
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
