Neoinstitutionalism as a Methodology for Studying the Effectiveness of Higher Education Management
Research Article
How to Cite
Bersirov T.B. Neoinstitutionalism as a Methodology for Studying the Effectiveness of Higher Education Management. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 45-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2021.3.3 (in Russ.).
Abstract
Objective of the study is identification of the potential of the neoinstitutional approach for studying the tools of state management in improving the effectiveness of higher education.
The methodological basis of the research is the neoinstitutional theory of Douglas North, which contains sufficient cognitive potential to study the effectiveness of the use of managerial tools in the management practices of higher education.
Research results. The neoinstitutional paradigm has a high potential for studying the tools of state management in improving the effectiveness of higher education. This conclusion is supported by several reasons. First, general methodological issues. The theory of new institutions solves the conflict that has long been formed in sociology between the originally inherent emphasis on the search for criteria of social stability, social balance, and social stability, and the current shift in emphasis on individual requests and needs of individual actors, which potentially increase the conflict potential of society. Secondly, there is a common subject space between neoinstitutionalism and the topic of the stated problem, which is expressed in the commonality of the tasks to be solved, the similarity of methods, thematic spectra, and the commonality of the conceptual series.
Prospects of the study. In the future, we plan to explore real managerial management practices aimed at improving the efficiency of higher education in Russia.
Keywords:
managerism, public administration, efficiency, managerial tools, neoinstitutionalism, institutional balance, contract economy, transaction costs
References
1. Volchik, V. V., Savko, P. O., Koryttsev, M. A., Oganesyan, A. A., Maskaev, A. I. (2018). Transactional costs in higher education in the context of organizational and institutional changes. Journal of Economic Regulation, 9, 57-68. (in Russian).
2. Dyatlov, A. V., Kovalev, V. V. (2021). Transformation of the Institute of City Management in the municipal administration of the South of Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 3, 66-77. (in Russian).
3. Kovalev, V. V., Dyatlov, A. V., Vodenko, K. V. (2020). Public solvency of the Institute of City Management in the estimates of the population of the Rostov region and the Republic of Adygea. Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (Novocherkasskogo politekhnicheskogo instituta), 13, 4, 127-139. (in Russian).
4. Kultygin, V. P. (2004). The theory of rational choice-the emergence and social state. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1, 27-36. (in Russian).
5. Rozmainsky, I. V. (2010). Institutionalizm. Journal of Institutional Research, 2, 4, 130-144. (in Russian).
6. Tyukavkin, N. M. (2015). Systematization of the theoretical foundations of neo-institutionalism. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravleniye, 9/1 (131), 209-216. (in Russian).
7. Coleman, J. S. (1993). The Role of Rights in a Theory of Social Action. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149, 213-232.
8. Demsetz, H. (1988). Efficiency, Competition, and Policy. Oxford, I-II, 164-184.
2. Dyatlov, A. V., Kovalev, V. V. (2021). Transformation of the Institute of City Management in the municipal administration of the South of Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 3, 66-77. (in Russian).
3. Kovalev, V. V., Dyatlov, A. V., Vodenko, K. V. (2020). Public solvency of the Institute of City Management in the estimates of the population of the Rostov region and the Republic of Adygea. Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (Novocherkasskogo politekhnicheskogo instituta), 13, 4, 127-139. (in Russian).
4. Kultygin, V. P. (2004). The theory of rational choice-the emergence and social state. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1, 27-36. (in Russian).
5. Rozmainsky, I. V. (2010). Institutionalizm. Journal of Institutional Research, 2, 4, 130-144. (in Russian).
6. Tyukavkin, N. M. (2015). Systematization of the theoretical foundations of neo-institutionalism. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravleniye, 9/1 (131), 209-216. (in Russian).
7. Coleman, J. S. (1993). The Role of Rights in a Theory of Social Action. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149, 213-232.
8. Demsetz, H. (1988). Efficiency, Competition, and Policy. Oxford, I-II, 164-184.
Article
Received: 12.03.2021
Accepted: 29.07.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Bersirov, T. B. (2021). Neoinstitutionalism as a Methodology for Studying the Effectiveness of Higher Education Management. Humanities of the South of Russia, 10(3), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2021.3.3
Section
METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF SOCIO-HUMANITARIAN COGNITION
