Predictors of Fabbing in the Structure of Social Communications
Research Article
How to Cite
Grigoryev N.Y., Chvyakin V.A. Predictors of Fabbing in the Structure of Social Communications. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 90-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2021.3.7 (in Russ.).
Abstract
Objective of the study is due to the need to identify risk factors that complicate the system of social communications as a whole. In the complex of such factors, the leading role belongs to the attractiveness of the virtual environment, which allows you to make and maintain contacts at a distance, promotes the expansion of the circle of acquaintances and anonymity of communication, the formation of a virtual personality with any desired characteristics, the ability to try on any roles and implement them in the process of communication. Subjective factors are also important as the reasons for fabbing. In such cases, we are talking about a complex of personal characteristics that determine the structure of the communication characteristics of a particular person. The main reasons for fabbing are the focus on virtual reality, the anxiety factor and personal disorganization.
The methodological basis of the study is the general theory of social communication, taking into account the behavioral approach in the assessment of fabbing (V. Chotpitayasunondh, K. Douglas, J. A. Finkel, D. J. Kruger), as well as the principles of regulation of fabbing’s structural models in interpersonal communication (A. Guazzini, M. Duradoni, A. Capelli, P. Meringolo, M. Beranuy, U. Oberst, X. Carbonell, A. Chamarro, K. Kircaburun and others).
Research results. Fabbing is a complex social and communicative phenomenon that is caused by a combination of subjective and objective factors. The attractiveness of virtual reality for a modern person contributes to the manifestation of fabbing. The main predictors of fabbing are orientation to virtual reality, anxiety and personal disorganization of the subject.
The prospects of the study suggest the development of measures to prevent fabbing by psychological and pedagogical means and with the help of social learning technologies.
Keywords:
fabbing, social communication, predictors of fabbing, satisfaction with communication, negative consequences of fabbing
References
1. Golubeva, N. A. (2018). Phenomenology of interpersonal and intergroup communication of modern youth in real and virtual space. Vestnik RGGU. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovaniye, 2 (12). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fenomenologiya-mezhlichnostnogo-i-mezhgruppovogo-obscheniya-sovremennoy-molodezhi-v-realnom-i-virtualnom-prostranstve. (in Russian).
2. Gorshkov, M. K., Sheregi, F. E. (2010). Youth of Russia: a sociological portrait. Moscow: TsSPiM. (in Russian).
3. Grigoriev, N. Yu., Chvyakin, V. A. (2021). Fabbing as an undefined phenomenon in the structure of social deviantology. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 2 (48), 27-37. DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.2.2. (in Russian).
4. Gulyaeva, M. A. (2012). Types of refusal from communication as a communicative act. Izvestiya VSPU, 11. (in Russian).
5. Gulyaeva, M. A. (2013). Strategies for refusing to communicate. Izvestiya VSPU, 1 (76). (in Russian).
6. Esaulova, K. S. (2016). Towards the definition of social courage: in real life and Internet communication. Vestnik RGGU. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovaniye, 2 (4). Available at: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-opredeleniyu- sotsialnoy-smelosti-v-realnoy-zhizni-i-internet-kommunikatsii. (in Russian).
7. Kobyzeva, V. O. (2010). Features of virtual communication in everyday communicative practices of youth. SISP, 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-virtualnogo-obscheniya-v-povsednevnyh-kommunikativnyh-praktikah-molodezhi-2. (in Russian).
8. Chvyakin, V. A., Grigoryev, N. Yu. (2020). Fabbing in the structure of social communications: a sociological analysis of the phenomenon. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 9, 5, 150-161. DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2020.5.12. (in Russian).
9. Kircaburun, K., Griffiths, M. D. (2018). Problematic Instagram Use: The Role of Perceived Feeling of Presence and Escapism. Int. J. Ment. Health Addiction. P. 76.
2. Gorshkov, M. K., Sheregi, F. E. (2010). Youth of Russia: a sociological portrait. Moscow: TsSPiM. (in Russian).
3. Grigoriev, N. Yu., Chvyakin, V. A. (2021). Fabbing as an undefined phenomenon in the structure of social deviantology. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 2 (48), 27-37. DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.2.2. (in Russian).
4. Gulyaeva, M. A. (2012). Types of refusal from communication as a communicative act. Izvestiya VSPU, 11. (in Russian).
5. Gulyaeva, M. A. (2013). Strategies for refusing to communicate. Izvestiya VSPU, 1 (76). (in Russian).
6. Esaulova, K. S. (2016). Towards the definition of social courage: in real life and Internet communication. Vestnik RGGU. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovaniye, 2 (4). Available at: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-opredeleniyu- sotsialnoy-smelosti-v-realnoy-zhizni-i-internet-kommunikatsii. (in Russian).
7. Kobyzeva, V. O. (2010). Features of virtual communication in everyday communicative practices of youth. SISP, 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-virtualnogo-obscheniya-v-povsednevnyh-kommunikativnyh-praktikah-molodezhi-2. (in Russian).
8. Chvyakin, V. A., Grigoryev, N. Yu. (2020). Fabbing in the structure of social communications: a sociological analysis of the phenomenon. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 9, 5, 150-161. DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2020.5.12. (in Russian).
9. Kircaburun, K., Griffiths, M. D. (2018). Problematic Instagram Use: The Role of Perceived Feeling of Presence and Escapism. Int. J. Ment. Health Addiction. P. 76.
Article
Received: 10.05.2021
Accepted: 29.07.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Grigoryev, N. Y., & Chvyakin, V. A. (2021). Predictors of Fabbing in the Structure of Social Communications. Humanities of the South of Russia, 10(3), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2021.3.7
Section
CULTURE AND GLOBALIZATION
