Social responsibility of a scientific institution: socio-managerial analysis
Research Article
How to Cite
Salogub A.M., Arselgova M.A. Social responsibility of a scientific institution: socio-managerial analysis. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 84-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2022.4.6 (in Russ.).
Abstract
Objective of the study is to conduct a comprehensive socio-managerial analysis of the state and problems in the field of social responsibility of scientific institutions of the Russian Federation and developing scientific and practical recommendations on the implementation of the social responsibility management model in the industry based on its results.
The methodological basis of the. The publication is based on the application of system-structural, concrete historical, dialectical methods in the study of objective social phenomena. To clarify aspects related to the practice of managing the social responsibility of scientific institutions in Russia, a survey was conducted of experts - heads of departments / areas, social management of five scientific institutions leading in subject areas of research in five different regions of the country, including one of the largest universal research universities at the federal level.
Research results. The notion that the institution of social responsibility contributes to the integral development of scientific institutions as social organizations through improving the quality of management and resistance to negative environmental fluctuations, meanwhile, due to a number of objective reasons (such as lack of competencies and knowledge) and subjective (such as the lack of will of the founders and management to implement social innovations) the nature of the introduction of social responsibility mechanisms in the Russian scientific sphere is stalling and still remains at an embryonic level. Practical recommendations have been developed for the implementation of the social responsibility management model for scientific institutions.
Prospects of the study. Conducting detailed in-depth assessments of the current state and practice of introducing social responsibility in a large sample of scientific institutions with differentiation by form of ownership, region of presence, size (including headcount), priority areas of scientific research.
Keywords:
social responsibility, scientific institutions, research institutes, internal social responsibility, external social responsibility, social innovation, social management
References
Gubanov N. N. (2020) Social responsibility of a scientist and freedom of scientific creativity / N. N. Gubanov, N. I. Gubanov, L. G. Cheremnykh, E. I. Turova // Humanitarian Bulletin of Bauman Moscow State Technical University. –No. 5 (85). – P. 1. – DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2020-5-681.
Dolina O. N. (2018) Development of models of interaction between non-profit organizations and business for solving social problems in Russia // Entrepreneur's Guide. – No. 37. – Pp. 58-65.
Korezina T. V. (2016) Social responsibility of the state and business in Russia / T. V. Korezina, O. V. Polyakova // Public administration and economics: current state and prospects of development. – Pp. 218-225.
Koshik A. V. (2019) Modern approaches to social responsibility in higher education // Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Problems of linguistics and pedagogy. – No. 1. – Pp. 219-229. – DOI: 10.15593/2224-9389/2019.1.18.
Novikov A. I. (2018) Inclusive economy and social responsibility in the regions of the world: dilemma or public consent / A. I. Novikov, M. K. Vitkina // Regional Economics and Management: electronic scientific journal. – No. 2 (54). – P. 1.
Reznik G. A. (2018) Social responsibility of a modern enterprise and effective tools of its social positioning // Bulletin of Eurasian Science. – Vol. 10, No. 3. – P. 35.
Salogub A. M. (2020) Implementation of the principles of corporate social responsibility in the activities of scientific institutions / A. M. Salogub, M. A. Arselgova // University readings – 2020. Materials of scientific and methodological readings of PSU. – Pyatigorsk: Publishing House of PSU. – Pp. 118–124.
Cheglakova L. M. (2018) Characteristic features of social responsibility and ethics in small and medium-sized business organizations in Russia / L. M. Cheglakova, B. S. Bataeva, O. A. Melitonyan // Russian Journal of Management. – Vol. 16, No. 1. – Pp. 63-94. – DOI: 10.21638/10.21638/11701/spbu18.2018.103.
Brdulak H. et al. (2020) Social responsibility of universities and colleges: the view of SGH Warsaw school of Economics stakeholders // CSR in Contemporary Poland. – Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. – Pp. 85-102.
Cai Y. (2022) Neo-triple helix model of innovation ecosystems: integrating triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models // Triple Helix. – Vol. 1. – Pp. 76-106. DOI: 10.1163/21971927-bja10029.
Friedman M. (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits // New York Times Magazine. – September, 13. – URL: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/milton-friedman-social-responsibility-of-business/
Hernández-Perlines F. (2018) The Role of Environment in Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation. The case of Family Firms / F. Hernández-Perlines, M.A. Ibarra Cisneros // Sustainability. – Vol. 10, No. 6. – P. 2037. – DOI: 10.3390/su10062037.
Jha A. (2015) Corporate social responsibility and social capital / A. Jha, J. Cox // Journal of Banking & Finance. – Vol. 60. – Pp. 252-270.
Latapí Agudelo M. A. (2019) A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility / M. A. Latapí Agudelo, L. Jóhannsdóttir, B.A. Davídsdóttir // International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. – Vol. 4, No. 1. – Pp. 1-23.
McGuire J. W. (1963) Business and Society. – N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Nunan R. (1988) The Libertarian Conception of Corporate Property: A Critique of Milton Friedman's Views on the Social Responsibility of Business // Journal of Business Ethics. – Рp. 891-906.
Rahman A. A. (2019) Corporate social responsibility in higher education: A study of the institutionalisation of CSR in Malaysian public universities / A. A. Rahman, P. Castka, T. Love // Corporate social responsibility and Environmental Management. – Vol. 26, No. 4. – Pp. 916-928.
Roberts R. (2013) An Interview with Milton Friedman // Chap. L. Rev. – Vol. 17. – P. 477.
Ruiz B. (2021) Analyzing the relationship between CSR and reputation in the banking sector / B. Ruiz, J.A. García // Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier. – Vol. 61. – Pp. 102-552.
Van Marrewijk M. (2003) Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion // Journal of Business Ethics. – Vol. 44, No. 2. – Pp. 95-105.
Dolina O. N. (2018) Development of models of interaction between non-profit organizations and business for solving social problems in Russia // Entrepreneur's Guide. – No. 37. – Pp. 58-65.
Korezina T. V. (2016) Social responsibility of the state and business in Russia / T. V. Korezina, O. V. Polyakova // Public administration and economics: current state and prospects of development. – Pp. 218-225.
Koshik A. V. (2019) Modern approaches to social responsibility in higher education // Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Problems of linguistics and pedagogy. – No. 1. – Pp. 219-229. – DOI: 10.15593/2224-9389/2019.1.18.
Novikov A. I. (2018) Inclusive economy and social responsibility in the regions of the world: dilemma or public consent / A. I. Novikov, M. K. Vitkina // Regional Economics and Management: electronic scientific journal. – No. 2 (54). – P. 1.
Reznik G. A. (2018) Social responsibility of a modern enterprise and effective tools of its social positioning // Bulletin of Eurasian Science. – Vol. 10, No. 3. – P. 35.
Salogub A. M. (2020) Implementation of the principles of corporate social responsibility in the activities of scientific institutions / A. M. Salogub, M. A. Arselgova // University readings – 2020. Materials of scientific and methodological readings of PSU. – Pyatigorsk: Publishing House of PSU. – Pp. 118–124.
Cheglakova L. M. (2018) Characteristic features of social responsibility and ethics in small and medium-sized business organizations in Russia / L. M. Cheglakova, B. S. Bataeva, O. A. Melitonyan // Russian Journal of Management. – Vol. 16, No. 1. – Pp. 63-94. – DOI: 10.21638/10.21638/11701/spbu18.2018.103.
Brdulak H. et al. (2020) Social responsibility of universities and colleges: the view of SGH Warsaw school of Economics stakeholders // CSR in Contemporary Poland. – Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. – Pp. 85-102.
Cai Y. (2022) Neo-triple helix model of innovation ecosystems: integrating triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models // Triple Helix. – Vol. 1. – Pp. 76-106. DOI: 10.1163/21971927-bja10029.
Friedman M. (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits // New York Times Magazine. – September, 13. – URL: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/milton-friedman-social-responsibility-of-business/
Hernández-Perlines F. (2018) The Role of Environment in Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation. The case of Family Firms / F. Hernández-Perlines, M.A. Ibarra Cisneros // Sustainability. – Vol. 10, No. 6. – P. 2037. – DOI: 10.3390/su10062037.
Jha A. (2015) Corporate social responsibility and social capital / A. Jha, J. Cox // Journal of Banking & Finance. – Vol. 60. – Pp. 252-270.
Latapí Agudelo M. A. (2019) A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility / M. A. Latapí Agudelo, L. Jóhannsdóttir, B.A. Davídsdóttir // International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. – Vol. 4, No. 1. – Pp. 1-23.
McGuire J. W. (1963) Business and Society. – N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Nunan R. (1988) The Libertarian Conception of Corporate Property: A Critique of Milton Friedman's Views on the Social Responsibility of Business // Journal of Business Ethics. – Рp. 891-906.
Rahman A. A. (2019) Corporate social responsibility in higher education: A study of the institutionalisation of CSR in Malaysian public universities / A. A. Rahman, P. Castka, T. Love // Corporate social responsibility and Environmental Management. – Vol. 26, No. 4. – Pp. 916-928.
Roberts R. (2013) An Interview with Milton Friedman // Chap. L. Rev. – Vol. 17. – P. 477.
Ruiz B. (2021) Analyzing the relationship between CSR and reputation in the banking sector / B. Ruiz, J.A. García // Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier. – Vol. 61. – Pp. 102-552.
Van Marrewijk M. (2003) Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion // Journal of Business Ethics. – Vol. 44, No. 2. – Pp. 95-105.
Article
Received: 28.07.2022
Accepted: 10.09.2022
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Salogub, A. M., & Arselgova, M. A. (2022). Social responsibility of a scientific institution: socio-managerial analysis. Humanities of the South of Russia, 11(4), 84-102. https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2022.4.6
Section
SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN MODERN SOCIETY
