Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia
How to Cite
Zarubina N.N. 2015. Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. No. 2. P. 5-22.
Abstract
The article addresses the socio-cultural and institutional problems of the innovative development of the Russian economy. The author concludes that the most important obstacle to innovative development in all spheres of the social, economic and cultural life of Russia is not the lack of social innovations but its extremely high pace . Social life in Russia for centuries formed under constant transformations representing non-organic attempts at modernisation from the up side . Economic reforms in the 1990s went beyond the permissible “step novelty” and caused the simplification and archaisation of the economy and human capital, resulting in the closure and conversion of modern high-tech industries, losing the skills of the workforce . Russian markets and entrepreneurship, understood as the existing system of institutions, themselves do not motivate the innovative behaviour of the participants . Furthermore, due to the orientation toward an immediate return, the innovative activities can be blocked because it is difficult to be evaluated using formal monetary indicators. A significant part of society feels alienated from the changes taking place . In response to the alienation from social innovation comes the archaisation of social practices . It is more or less a conscious rejection of innovations in various areas of life due to its inaccessibility and the lack of an institutional environment for its development.
Keywords:
social innovation, innovativeness, «step novelty», social inequality, complex society, adaptation, archaism, everyday life
References
Akhiezer A. S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta. [Russia: a critique of the historical experience]. T. III. M.: Izd-vo FO SSSR, 1991 — 470 s. (In Russ.).
Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.]. V kn.: Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress. , 1990. — 808 s. (Russ. Ed.).
Voz’mitel’ A. A. Obraz zhizni: tendentsii i kharakter izmenenii v poreformennoi Rossii. [Lifestyle trends and nature of changes in post-reform Russia]. M.: IS RAN, 2012. — 230 s. (In Russ.).
Gotovo li rossiiskoe obshchestvo k modernizatsii? Analiticheskii doklad. [Is Russian society towards modernization. Analytic report]. M.: IS RAN, 2010. — 180 s. (In Russ.).
Dvadtsat’ let reform glazami rossiyan: opyt mnogoletnikh sotsiologicheskikh zamerov. Pod red. M. K. Gorshkova, R. Krumma, V. V. Petukhova. [Twenty years of reform through the eyes of Russians: the experience of long-term measurements of sociological]. — M.: Ves’ Mir, 2011. — 328 s. (In Russ)
Danilenko L. N. Fenomen rentoorientirovannogo povedeniya v institutsional’nom aspekte. [Thephenomenon of rent-seeking behavior institutionally]. J. Mir Rossii, 2013. T. 22, № 3. s. 35 — 59. (In Russ.).
Erasov B. S. Tsivilizatsii: universalii i samobytnost’. [Civilization: Universal and identity]. M.: Nauka, 2002. — 524 s. (In Russ.).
Zarubina N. N. Den’gi kak sotsiokul’turnyi fenomen. [ Kravchenko S. A. Sotsial’nye realii i sotsiologiya: podkhody [The Social Realities and Sociology: Approaches]. J. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 9. M.: Novyj khronograf, 2010. S. 24 — 43. (In Russ.).
Kravchenko S. A. Stanovlenie slozhnogo obshchestva: k obosnovaniyu gumanisticheskoi teorii slozhnosti. [Formation of a complex society: to the justification of the humanistic theory of complexity]. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2012. — 306 s. (In Russ.).
Lapin N. I. Teoriya i praktika innovatiki. [Theory and Practice of Innovation]. M.: Logos, — 328 s. (In Russ.).
Lebedeva N. M. Tsennosti kul’tury, ekonomicheskie ustanovki i otnoshenie k innovatsiyam v Rossii. [Cultural values, economic attitudes and attitudes towards innovation in Russia]. J. Zhurnal GU- VShE «Psikhologiya». 2008. T. 5, № 2. S. 68 - 88. (In Russ.).
Lebedeva N. M. Tsennosti i otnoshenie k innovatsiyam rossiiskikh i kanadskikh studentov. [Values and attitudes to innovation Russian and Canadian students]. J. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. T. 30, № 5. S. 110 - 121. (In Russ.).
Lotman Yu. M. Problema znaka i znakovoi sistemy v tipologii russkoi kul’tury XI—XIX vekov. [Sign problem and sign system in the typology of Russian culture XI-XIX centuries]. V kn.: Lotman Ju. M. Chemu uchatsya lyudi. M.: Tsentr Knigi Rudomino. 2010. — 416 s. (In Russ.).
Nashe kupechestvo i torgovlya s ser’eznoi i karikaturnoi storony. [Our merchants and trade with serious and cartoonish hand]. M. , 1867 — 1868. — 228 s. (In Russ.).
O chem mechtayut rossiyane. Ideal i real’nost’. [What Russians dreams. Ideal and the reality]. M.: Ves’ mir, 2013. — 400 s. (In Russ.).
Sergeev D. V. Sotsial’no-kul’turnaya situatsiya v Rossii nachala XXI v.: retsidivnaya kul’tura, arkhaizatsiya, izobretennaya arkhaika. [The socio-cultural situation in Russia at the beginning of XXIcentury.: Recurrent culture, archaism, invented archaic]. J. Mir Rossii. 2012. № 3. S. 100 — 118. (In Russ.).
Fromm E. Chelovek dlya samogo sebya. [Fromm Erich. Man For Himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York, 1964]. Minsk: Harvest, 2003. — 352 s. (Russ. Ed.).
Kharrison L. Sposobstvuya progressivnym preobrazovaniyam v kul’ture. [Contributingprogressive transformations in culture]. J. Kul’tura imeet znachenie. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii. 2002. — 320 s. (In Russ.).
Shuvalova O. R. Indikatory innovatsionnogo klimata v Rossii (po itogam massovykh oprosov naseleniya). [Indicators of innovation climate in Russia (based on the mass population surveys)]. J. Forsajt. 2010. T. 4. № 1. S. 41. (In Russ.).
Shumpeter I. A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya. [Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Per. s nem. — M.: Eksmo, 2007. — 864 s. (In Russ.).
Shyutts A. Vozvrashchayushchiisya domoi. [Returns home]. V kn.: A. Shyutts. Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira. Ocherki po fenomenologicheskoi sotsiologii. M.: In-t Fonda «Obshchestvennoe mnenie», 2003. — 336 s. (In Russ.).
Yasin E. G. , Lebedeva N. M. Kul’tura i innovatsii. K postanovke problem. [Culture and innovation. Statement of the Problem]. J. Forsait. 2009. № 2 (10). S. 16 — 26.
Yaspers K. Istoki istorii i ee tsel’. [The origins of the history and its purpose]. Vyp. 1. M.: INION, 1991. — 217 s. (Russ. Ed.).
Shane S. Why Do Some Societies Invent More Than Others? J. Journal of Business Venturing, 1992, № 7.
Weber M. Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur Religionssoziologie. B. I. Konfuzianismus und Taoismus Tuebingen, 1923 — 708 S
Schwartz S. H., Bardi A. Value Hierarchies Across Aultures: Taking a Similarities Perspective. J. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2001, v. 32.
Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.]. V kn.: Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress. , 1990. — 808 s. (Russ. Ed.).
Voz’mitel’ A. A. Obraz zhizni: tendentsii i kharakter izmenenii v poreformennoi Rossii. [Lifestyle trends and nature of changes in post-reform Russia]. M.: IS RAN, 2012. — 230 s. (In Russ.).
Gotovo li rossiiskoe obshchestvo k modernizatsii? Analiticheskii doklad. [Is Russian society towards modernization. Analytic report]. M.: IS RAN, 2010. — 180 s. (In Russ.).
Dvadtsat’ let reform glazami rossiyan: opyt mnogoletnikh sotsiologicheskikh zamerov. Pod red. M. K. Gorshkova, R. Krumma, V. V. Petukhova. [Twenty years of reform through the eyes of Russians: the experience of long-term measurements of sociological]. — M.: Ves’ Mir, 2011. — 328 s. (In Russ)
Danilenko L. N. Fenomen rentoorientirovannogo povedeniya v institutsional’nom aspekte. [Thephenomenon of rent-seeking behavior institutionally]. J. Mir Rossii, 2013. T. 22, № 3. s. 35 — 59. (In Russ.).
Erasov B. S. Tsivilizatsii: universalii i samobytnost’. [Civilization: Universal and identity]. M.: Nauka, 2002. — 524 s. (In Russ.).
Zarubina N. N. Den’gi kak sotsiokul’turnyi fenomen. [ Kravchenko S. A. Sotsial’nye realii i sotsiologiya: podkhody [The Social Realities and Sociology: Approaches]. J. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 9. M.: Novyj khronograf, 2010. S. 24 — 43. (In Russ.).
Kravchenko S. A. Stanovlenie slozhnogo obshchestva: k obosnovaniyu gumanisticheskoi teorii slozhnosti. [Formation of a complex society: to the justification of the humanistic theory of complexity]. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2012. — 306 s. (In Russ.).
Lapin N. I. Teoriya i praktika innovatiki. [Theory and Practice of Innovation]. M.: Logos, — 328 s. (In Russ.).
Lebedeva N. M. Tsennosti kul’tury, ekonomicheskie ustanovki i otnoshenie k innovatsiyam v Rossii. [Cultural values, economic attitudes and attitudes towards innovation in Russia]. J. Zhurnal GU- VShE «Psikhologiya». 2008. T. 5, № 2. S. 68 - 88. (In Russ.).
Lebedeva N. M. Tsennosti i otnoshenie k innovatsiyam rossiiskikh i kanadskikh studentov. [Values and attitudes to innovation Russian and Canadian students]. J. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. T. 30, № 5. S. 110 - 121. (In Russ.).
Lotman Yu. M. Problema znaka i znakovoi sistemy v tipologii russkoi kul’tury XI—XIX vekov. [Sign problem and sign system in the typology of Russian culture XI-XIX centuries]. V kn.: Lotman Ju. M. Chemu uchatsya lyudi. M.: Tsentr Knigi Rudomino. 2010. — 416 s. (In Russ.).
Nashe kupechestvo i torgovlya s ser’eznoi i karikaturnoi storony. [Our merchants and trade with serious and cartoonish hand]. M. , 1867 — 1868. — 228 s. (In Russ.).
O chem mechtayut rossiyane. Ideal i real’nost’. [What Russians dreams. Ideal and the reality]. M.: Ves’ mir, 2013. — 400 s. (In Russ.).
Sergeev D. V. Sotsial’no-kul’turnaya situatsiya v Rossii nachala XXI v.: retsidivnaya kul’tura, arkhaizatsiya, izobretennaya arkhaika. [The socio-cultural situation in Russia at the beginning of XXIcentury.: Recurrent culture, archaism, invented archaic]. J. Mir Rossii. 2012. № 3. S. 100 — 118. (In Russ.).
Fromm E. Chelovek dlya samogo sebya. [Fromm Erich. Man For Himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York, 1964]. Minsk: Harvest, 2003. — 352 s. (Russ. Ed.).
Kharrison L. Sposobstvuya progressivnym preobrazovaniyam v kul’ture. [Contributingprogressive transformations in culture]. J. Kul’tura imeet znachenie. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii. 2002. — 320 s. (In Russ.).
Shuvalova O. R. Indikatory innovatsionnogo klimata v Rossii (po itogam massovykh oprosov naseleniya). [Indicators of innovation climate in Russia (based on the mass population surveys)]. J. Forsajt. 2010. T. 4. № 1. S. 41. (In Russ.).
Shumpeter I. A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya. [Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Per. s nem. — M.: Eksmo, 2007. — 864 s. (In Russ.).
Shyutts A. Vozvrashchayushchiisya domoi. [Returns home]. V kn.: A. Shyutts. Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira. Ocherki po fenomenologicheskoi sotsiologii. M.: In-t Fonda «Obshchestvennoe mnenie», 2003. — 336 s. (In Russ.).
Yasin E. G. , Lebedeva N. M. Kul’tura i innovatsii. K postanovke problem. [Culture and innovation. Statement of the Problem]. J. Forsait. 2009. № 2 (10). S. 16 — 26.
Yaspers K. Istoki istorii i ee tsel’. [The origins of the history and its purpose]. Vyp. 1. M.: INION, 1991. — 217 s. (Russ. Ed.).
Shane S. Why Do Some Societies Invent More Than Others? J. Journal of Business Venturing, 1992, № 7.
Weber M. Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur Religionssoziologie. B. I. Konfuzianismus und Taoismus Tuebingen, 1923 — 708 S
Schwartz S. H., Bardi A. Value Hierarchies Across Aultures: Taking a Similarities Perspective. J. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2001, v. 32.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Zarubina, N. N. (2015) ’Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, (2), pp. 5-22. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/socnp/article/view/3057 (Accessed: 6December2025).
Section
UNTITLED
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)