Dynamics of Culture of the Scientific Community: Sociological Theories and Social Practices

  • Vladimir I. Konnov Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO- University) v.konnov@inno.mgimo.ru
How to Cite
Konnov V.I. 2015. Dynamics of Culture of the Scientific Community: Sociological Theories and Social Practices — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. No. 2. P. 76-96.

Abstract

The article attempts to trace changes in two elements of sociological theory, the first being descriptions of the social role and organization of the scientific community, the second — key methodological norms, prescribing certain research approaches. The first generation of sociological theories (A. Comte, H. Spencer, K. Marx, E. Durkheim) tended to see scientific community as an organizational model for society and considered that the key methodological principles, which allowed it to achieve this status, were empiricism, value-neutrality, specialization and accumulation of results. However by the end of the XIX century sociologists adopt a perspective, which treats science as a product of a certain culture, derived from its value system, and admits the relative nature of scientific knowledge (M. Weber, G. Simmel, K. Mannheim). The concept of science as a system dependent on the key values of the European civilization (particularly its protestant branch) achieved its high-point in the works of R. Merton. This point of view was reconsidered by T. Kuhn. His concept of paradigms as practices consequently achieving dominant status in sciences served as a foundation for the new wave of the sociology of science (D. Bloor, B. Barnes, K. Knorr Cetina, B. Latour), which considered scientific disciplines and schools to be separate cultures, functioning in close connection with their social contexts.An overview of the sociologists’ views on these problems allows to recognize the gradual changes in the cultural basis of the scientific community and to uncover movement from the initial desire to build a unified scientific system to division ofprofessional disciplines and further on to creation of relatively autonomous paradigms within disciplines and on their borders. The author points out that these paradigms may provide conditions for increased influence of extrinsic factors, including national cultures, on science.
Keywords:
scientific community, sociology of science, scientific culture, ethos of science

Author Biography

Vladimir I. Konnov, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO- University)
Candidate of Sociological Sciences, associate professor, Department of Philosophy

References

Bek U. Chto takoe globalizatsiya? [What is globalization?] Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, — 304 p. (Russ. Ed.)



Giddens E. Ustroenie obshchestva. [The structure of society]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2003. — 657 p. (Russ. Ed.).



Gorshkov M. K. Obshchestvo — sotsiologiya — vlast’: k voprosu o vzaimodeystvii. [Society — Sociology — Power: the question of the interaction]. J. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2012, № 7. P. 23-28. (In Russ.).



Demina N. V. Mertonovskaya kontseptsiya etosa nauki: v poiskakh sotsial’noy geometrii norm. [Merton’s concept of the ethos of science: in search of social norms geometry]. J. Etos nauki. Pod red. Kiyashchenko L. P., Mirskoy E. Z. Moscow: Academia, 2008. — P. 144-165. (In Russ.).



Dyurkgeym E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sotsiologii. [The division of labor in society. Method of Sociology]. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. — 576 P. (Russ. Ed.).



Zimmel’ G. Kak vozmozhno obshchestvo? [How is society possible?]. Teoreticheskaya sot-siologiya. Antologiya: v 2 ch. Pod red. Ban’kovskoy S. P. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom «Universitet», Ch. 1. — S. 314-333.



Konnov V. I. Harakteristika rossijskoy nauchno-issledovatel’skoy kul’tury: vozmozhnosti social’no-psihologicheskogo podhoda. [Characteristics of Russian research culture: the possibility of socio-psychological approach], Voprosy psihologii, 2012. № 4. — S. 3-12. (In Russ.).



Kont O. Kurs pozitivnoy filosofii. [Course of positive philosophy]. Moscow: Librokom, 2012. — 296 s. (Russ. Ed.).



Kravchenko S. A. Nelineynaya sotsiokul’turnaya dinamika: igraizatsionnyy podkhod. [Nonlinear dynamics of the socio-cultural: game approach]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2006. — 172 P. (In Russ.).



Kravchenko S. A. Stanovlenie slozhnogo obshchestva: k obosnovaniyu gumanisticheskoy teorii slozhnosti. [Formation of a complex society: to the justification of humanistic theory of com-plexity]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2012. — 365 p. (In Russ.).



Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh rvolyutsiy. [Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow: AST Ermak, 2003. — 365 s. (Russ. Ed.).



Mangeym K. Ideologiya i utopiya. [Ideology and Utopia]. V kn K. Mangeym. Diagnoz nashego vremeni. Moscow: Jurist, 1994. S. 7-275. (Russ. Ed.).



Marks K. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. [Critique of political economy]. K. Marks, F. Engel’s. Sochineniya. T. 46. Ch. 1. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1968. S. 51-508. (Russ. Ed.).



Marks K. Ekonomiko-filosofskie rukopisi. [Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts]. K. Marks. Sociologiya. Sbornik. Moscow: Kanon-Press-C, 2000.



Merton R. Nauka i demokraticheskaya social’naya struktura. [Science and democratic social structure]. R. Merton. Social’naya teoriya i social’naya struktura. Moscow: AST, 2006. S. 767-781. (Russ. Ed.).



Popper K. Logika nauchnogo issledovaniya [Logic of Scientific Investigation]. Moscow: AST, 2010. — 576 p. (Russ. Ed.).



Popper K. Nishcheta istoritsizma. [The Poverty of Historicism]. Moscow: Progress, 1993. — 188 s. (Russ. Ed.).



Sorokin P. Social’naya i kul’turnaya dinamika. [Social and cultural dynamics]. Saint-Petersburg.: RHGI, 2000. — 1056 p. (Russ. Ed.).



Spenser G. Grehi zakonodatelej [Sinsof legislators], Socis, 1992. № 2. S. 125-136.



Urri Dzh. Sotsiologiya za predelami obshchestv. [Sociology beyond societies]. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2012. — 302 p. (Russ. Ed.).



Jaroshevskiy M. G. Shkoly v nauke. [Schools in Science]. Allahverdjan A. G., Moshkova G. Ju., Jurevich A. V., Jaroshevskij M. G. Psihologiya nauki. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Flinta», 1998. — S. 105-118. (In Russ.).



Barnes B. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge and K. Paul. 1977.



Barnes B., Shapin S. (eds.) Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. London: Sage Publications, 1979.



Bloor D. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.



Bryant G., Jary, D. (eds.) Anthony Giddens. Critical Assessments. London: Routledge, 1997.



Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.



Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. Universities and Global Knowledge Economy. New York: Continuum, 2001.



Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.



Horgan J. Why I Think Science is Ending /Electronic resource] Edge URL: http:// edge.org/conversation/why-i-think-science-is-ending (Date of reference: 15.12.2013).



Kleinman D., Vallas S. Contradiction in Convergence. Universities and Industry in the Biotechnology Field. S. Frickel K. Moore (eds.). J. The New Political Sociology of Science. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2006. P. 35-62.



Knorr Cetina, K. The Scientist as an Analogical Reasoner: A Critique of the Metaphor Theory of Innovation. K. Knorr Cetina, R. Krohn, R. Whitney (eds.). J. Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981.



Kuhn, T. Second Thoughts on Paradigms. T. Kuhn. The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977. P. 293-319.



Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.



Merton R. K. On Social Structure and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.



Merton R. K. Sociology of Science: an Epistemic Memoir. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979.



Merton R. K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.



Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. N.Y.: The Free Press, 1964.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Konnov, V. I. (2015) ’Dynamics of Culture of the Scientific Community: Sociological Theories and Social Practices’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, (2), pp. 76-96. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/socnp/article/view/3061 (Accessed: 14August2025).