Factors of Safety Status Formation under Acute and Daily Risks
Acknowledgments
This article was written with financial support of RGNF within the research project № 14 – 03 – 00139
How to Cite
Mozgovaja A.V., Shlykova E.V. 2016. Factors of Safety Status Formation under Acute and Daily Risks — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. No. 4. P. 52-73.
Abstract
The initial grounds of the article is the point that adaptation in the modern risk society is associated with daily "fuzzy" threats and becomes a permanent process. This process does not flow smoothly but in discrete steps: a new risk appears and requires a response such as formation of individual safety status. An individual is forced to concentrate all his resources in order to learn how to live with this new environmental factor, or displace it from his daily life as a result of protest activity.The article analyzes the data of two studies: one has been carried out in a community which is mobilizing resources for adaptation to a new risk; the other has been carried out in a community living under daily risks. The target populations selected for analysis are the young and older people. Hypothetically, it is assumed that there is specificity of factors used by representatives of these population groups for adaptation to daily and acute risks. An analysis of empirical data has revealed both similarities and differences between the factors used by the designated target group representatives for safety status formation. Interpretation of the data is summarized in the resulting part of the article.
Keywords:
security status, risk subculture, risky environment, adaptation resources, interpersonal and institutional trust, social well-being, insecurity
References
Gudkov L., Zorkaja N., Ovakimjan A. Gorodskoj klass: potencial adaptacii ili gotovnost' k izmenenijam. J. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija. Ijul'-dekabr' 2014. № 3–4(118). S. 80–117. (In Russ.).
Zubok Ju. A. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy social'nogo razvitija molodjozhi v obshhestve riska. J. Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2003. № 3(13). S. 124–141. (In Russ.).
Zubok Ju. A. Fenomen riska v sociologii. Opyt issledovanija molodjozhi. – M.: Mysl', 2007. – 296 s. (In Russ.).
Kozyreva P. M. Processy adaptacii i jevoljucija social'nogo samochuvstvija rossijan na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov. M.: Centr obshhechelovecheskih cennostej, 2004. – 320 s. (In Russ.).
Kornilova M. V. Institut social'noj zashhity naselenija v uslovijah usilenija social'nyh riskov (na primere social'nogo obsluzhivanija pozhilyh grazhdan g. Moskvy). Diss. na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kand. sociol. n. M.: Institut sociologii RAN, 2012. – 216 s. (In Russ.).
Kornilova M. V. Pozhilye ljudi «gruppy riska»: ponjatie, osobennosti zhiznennoj situacii i social'nogo obsluzhivanija. J. Risk: issledovanija i social'naja praktika / Otv. red. A. V. Mozgovaja. – M.: Institut sociologii RAN, 2011. S. 144–182. (In Russ.).
Mozgovaja A. V. Izmerenie riska v sociologii: metodologija, metody, rezul'taty. J. Risk: issledovanija i social'naja praktika / Otv. red. A. V. Mozgovaja. – M.: Institut sociologii RAN, 2011. S. 40–59. (In Russ.).
Mozgovaja A. V., Shlykova E. V. Social'nye resursy i adaptacija k risku: vybor strategii (na primere social'noj obshhnosti v situacii konkretnogo riska). J. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika. 2014. № 4. S. 25–49. (In Russ.).
Zubok Ju. A. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy social'nogo razvitija molodjozhi v obshhestve riska. J. Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2003. № 3(13). S. 124–141. (In Russ.).
Zubok Ju. A. Fenomen riska v sociologii. Opyt issledovanija molodjozhi. – M.: Mysl', 2007. – 296 s. (In Russ.).
Kozyreva P. M. Processy adaptacii i jevoljucija social'nogo samochuvstvija rossijan na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov. M.: Centr obshhechelovecheskih cennostej, 2004. – 320 s. (In Russ.).
Kornilova M. V. Institut social'noj zashhity naselenija v uslovijah usilenija social'nyh riskov (na primere social'nogo obsluzhivanija pozhilyh grazhdan g. Moskvy). Diss. na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kand. sociol. n. M.: Institut sociologii RAN, 2012. – 216 s. (In Russ.).
Kornilova M. V. Pozhilye ljudi «gruppy riska»: ponjatie, osobennosti zhiznennoj situacii i social'nogo obsluzhivanija. J. Risk: issledovanija i social'naja praktika / Otv. red. A. V. Mozgovaja. – M.: Institut sociologii RAN, 2011. S. 144–182. (In Russ.).
Mozgovaja A. V. Izmerenie riska v sociologii: metodologija, metody, rezul'taty. J. Risk: issledovanija i social'naja praktika / Otv. red. A. V. Mozgovaja. – M.: Institut sociologii RAN, 2011. S. 40–59. (In Russ.).
Mozgovaja A. V., Shlykova E. V. Social'nye resursy i adaptacija k risku: vybor strategii (na primere social'noj obshhnosti v situacii konkretnogo riska). J. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika. 2014. № 4. S. 25–49. (In Russ.).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Mozgovaja, A. V. and Shlykova, E. V. (2016) ’Factors of Safety Status Formation under Acute and Daily Risks’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, (4), pp. 52-73. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/socnp/article/view/3227 (Accessed: 5December2025).
Section
UNTITLED
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)