Russian Youth in the Formation and Use of Intellectual Potential

  • David L. Konstantinovskiy Institute of Sociology of the FACTS RAS scan21@mail.ru
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundationproject № 16-18-10420“Continuing education and science intensive productionsinstitutes and practices of interaction”
How to Cite
Konstantinovskiy D.L. 2017. Russian Youth in the Formation and Use of Intellectual Potential — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 46-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2017.5.4.5519

Abstract

Mass presence of Russian young people in spheres of education and work is considering. It is interpreted as social activity which is an important resource for successful formation and use of intellectual potential; to create an innovative economy without it is impossible. It is shown that the coverage of young people by vocational education has increased significantly. The current level is reached for the first time and indicates the emergence of a new situation, which influence at many aspects of society’s life. The share of young people employed in the labor market has declined somewhat, because the younger and middle age groups receive vocational education. But the level of economic activity of 25-29-year- olds is close to that observed in the population of older ages. The presence of young people in the structure of the workforce is similar. Restructuration of youth employment is discussed. This is one of important changes of labor market in the post-Soviet period. The number of young people in that sectors, where they were primarily employed earlier, has sharply declined. The youth unerringly grasped the changes in the economy, abandoned previous preferences and massively came to more attractive, rapidly developing industries. The problem of informal employment is also considered. The share of informally employed youth practically was not changed in the decade from 2006 till 2015. Attention is drawn to the fact that adolescents from the younger group (15-19 years) were represented there much more often. Data on youth unemployment are given. As in other countries unemployment among Russian youth is higher than in other age groups due to the specificity of the first entry into the labor market, difficulties of self-determination and the lack of coherence between sphere of education and the labor market. It is shown that the level of unemployment depends on the level of education. In general, the data presented in the article confirm the importance of social behavior of young people for the prospects of innovative development.
Keywords:
youth, education, intellectual potential, innovative development, labor market

Author Biography

David L. Konstantinovskiy, Institute of Sociology of the FACTS RAS
Doctor of Sociology, Main Researcher

References

Chelovecheskiy potentsial dlya innovatsionnoy ekonomiki. [Human potential for innovative economy]. Ed. by S. A. Ivanov. IPRE RAN. SPb.: GUAP publ., 2011. 188 p. (In Russ.).



Gasparishvili A. T. Sredneye spetsial’noye obrazovaniye v otsenkakh i mneniyakh vypusknikov ssuzov. [Secondary special education in the assessments and opinions of graduates of secondary vocational schools]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. 2016. № 1. P. 92-110. (In Russ.).



Gorbunova O. N., Gegamyan M. A. Obrazovaniye kak aktual’nyy komponent chelovecheskogo potentsiala. [Education as an actual component of human potential]. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiyeyavleniya iprotsessy. 2013. № 12 (58). P. 25-28. (In Russ.).



Ivanov O. I. Chelovecheskiy potentsial sovremennoy rossiyskoy ekonomiki. [Human potential of modern Russian economy]. Zhurnalsotsiologiiisotsial’noy antropologii. 2012. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 140-156. (In Russ.).



Indikatoryobrazovaniya. [Indicators of education]. 2017: statisticheskiy sbornik. Nats. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». M.: NIU VSHE publ., 2017. 320 p. (In Russ.).



Konstantinovskiy D. L., Popova E. S. Intellektual’nyy potentsial, innovatsii i obrazovanie. [Intellectual Potential, Innovations, and Education]. Sociologicheskaja nauka isocial’najapractika. 2016. № 4. Vol. 4. P. 36-60. (In Russ.).



Kostyleva S. Yu., Tolmacheva Ye. V. Rol’ chelovecheskogo potentsiala nauki v povyshenii effektivnosti institutsional’nykh reform vysshey shkoly: vyvody dlya ekonomicheskoy politiki. [The role of scientific human potential in improving the effectiveness of institutional reforms in higher education: conclusions for economic policy]. Vestnik TGU. 2015. Vypusk 5 (145). P. 171-177. (In Russ.).



Latova N. V. Sredniye spetsial’nyye uchebnyye zavedeniya: zhuravl’ v nebe ili sinitsa v rukakh? [Secondary special educational institutions: a crane in the sky or a bird in the hand?]. Obshchestvennyye nauki isovremennost’. 2016. № 1. P. 34-46. (In Russ.).



Lebedintseva L. A. Osobennosti innovatsionnogo intellektual’nogo truda i vosproizvodstva intellektual’nogo potentsiala: opyt Rossii. [Features of innovative intellectual work and the reproduction of intellectual potential: the experience of Russia]. Informatsionnoyeobshchestvo. 2012. Vyp. 1. P. 30—36. (In Russ.).



Narodnoye khozyaystvo RSFSR v 1988g. [The national economy of the RSFSR in 1988]. Stat. yezhegodnik. M., Finansy i Statistika. 1989. 688 p. (In Russ.).



Natkhov T., Polishchuk L. Inzhenery ili yuristy? Instituty i spros na vyssheye obrazovaniye. [Engineers or lawyers? Institutes and demand for Higher Education]. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2012. № 10. P. 30—51. (In Russ.).



Novyye smysly v obrazovatel’nykh strategiyakh molodezhi: 50 let issledovaniya (monografiya). [New meanings in the educational strategies of youth: 50 years of research (monograph)]. M.: TSSP i M publ., 2015. 232 p. (In Russ.).



Obrazovaniye v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. [Education in Russian Federation] 2014: statisticheskiy sbornik. Moskva: Natsional’nyy issledovatel’skiy universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» publ., 2014. 464 p. (In Russ.).



Rabochaya sila, zanyatost’ i bezrabotitsa v Rossii: 2016. [Labor force, employment and unemployment in Russia]: 2016: Stat. sb. Rosstat publ., 2016. 146 p. (In Russ.).



Svodnyye itogi Vserossiyskoy perepisi naseleniya 2010goda. Tabl. 2.2. [Consolidated results of the national census 2010. Tabl. 2.2.] Naseleniye po vozrastnym gruppam, polu i urovnyu obrazovaniyara [Population by age group, sex and level of education]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/ perepis2010/croc/vol11pdf-m.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.08.2017). (In Russ.).



Slobodchikova I. V., Bodzhayeva V. V. Intellektual’nyy potentsial molodezhi kak faktor razvitiya ekonomiki regionaю [Intellectual potential of youth as a factor in the development of the region’s econ¬omy]. Fundamental’nyye issledovaniya. 2015. № 11—1. P. 199—202. (In Russ.).



Soboleva I. V. Chelovecheskiy potentsial rossiyskoy ekonomiki. Problema sokhraneniya i razvitiya. [Human potential of Russian economy. The problem of preservation and development]. M.: Nauka publ., 2007. 202 p. (In Russ.).



Titova Ye. V. Usloviya razvitiya intellektual’nogo potentsiala v protsesse innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti. [Conditions for development of Intellectual Potential in the Process of Innovation Activity]. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy integratsii. 2010. № 12 (32). P. 22—28. (In Russ.).



Trud i zanyatost’ v Rossii: 2005. [Labor and employment in Russia]: 2005: Stat. sb. M.: Rosstat publ., 2006. 502 p. (In Russ.).



Shubkin V. N. Sotsiologicheskiye opyty (Metodologicheskiye voprosy sotsial’nykh issledovaniy). [Sociological experiments (Methodological issues of social research)]. M.: Mysl’ publ., 1970. 288 p. (In Russ.).



Zaslavskaya T. I. Chelovecheskiy potentsial v sovremennom transformatsionnom protsesse (na- chalo). [Human potential in the modern transformation process (beginning)]. Obshchestvennyye nauki isovremennost’. 2005. № 3. P. 5—16. (In Russ.).



Zaslavskaya T. I. Chelovecheskiy potentsial v sovremennom transformatsionnom protsesse (okon- chaniye). [Human potential in the modern transformation process (ending)]. Obshchestvennyye nauki isovremennost’. 2005. № 4. P. 13—25. (In Russ.).



Zosimova L. A., Zaytseva I. A., Shurtukhina I. V. Chelovecheskiy potentsial kak osnova in¬novatsionnoy ekonomiki [Human potential as a basis of innovative economy]. Aktual’nyye voprosy obrazovaniya i nauki. 2016. № 1—2 (53—54). P. 103—105. (In Russ.).



Boni A., Gasper D. Rethinking the Quality of Universities: How Can Human Development Thinking Contribute? // Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. 2012. Vol. 13. № 3. August. P. 451-470.



Gylfason T. Natural resources, education, and economic development // European Economic Review. 2001. May. Vol. 45(4-6). P. 847-859.



Konstantinovskiy D. L. Expansion of higher education and consequences for social inequality (the case of Russia) // Higher Education. August 2017. Vol. 74. Is.2. P. 201-220. DOI 10.1007/s10734-016-0043-7.



Landorf H., Doscher S., Rocco T. Education for sustainable human development: Towards a definition // School Field. 2008. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 221-236.



Little A. Development studies and comparative education: context, content, comparison and contributors // Comparative Education. 2000. Volume 36. № 3. P. 279-296.



Shulruf B., Morton S., Goodyear-Smith F., O’Loughlin C., Dixon R. Designing Multidisciplinary Longitudinal Studies of Human Development. Analyzing Past Research to Inform Methodology // Evaluation & the Health Professions. September 2007. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 207-228.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Konstantinovskiy, D. L. (2017) ’Russian Youth in the Formation and Use of Intellectual Potential’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 5(4), pp. 46-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2017.5.4.5519.