On the Reliability of Measurements in the Process of Reconstructing Social Types of Workers as Objects of Management

  • Galina G. Tatarova Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS tatarova-gg@rambler.ru
  • Galina P. Bessokirnaya Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS gala@isras.ru
How to Cite
Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaya G.P. 2018. On the Reliability of Measurements in the Process of Reconstructing Social Types of Workers as Objects of Management — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 52-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2018.6.2.5856

Abstract

The article presents the results of the implementation of the next stage of exploratory research on the development of technology for the typological analysis of workers. Its aim is to reconstruct latent social types among them, interpretable as objects of functional management. In previous stages, it was first established that identification with an enterprise may be considered as a basis of typology. Secondly, a whole range of theoretical and methodological solutions was proposed in relation to: the establishment of base type-identifying characteristics for describing the nature of identification; the formation of indices for their measurement; the definition of managing factors in work; the identifying of typological syndromes. This article is an attempt to address two questions, relating to the reliability of measurements, which apply to the process of typological analysis. The first question is: How reliable is the three-part model of identification with an enterprise? The second question is: How reliable (conceptually) is the cluster structure of workers by base type-identifying characteristics? To answer these questions, a comparative analysis was conducted of the instrumentation and data from four studies conducted in industrial enterprises between 2003 and 2014. The results of this analysis allowed for a conclusion to be made on the reliability of factorial and cluster measurements used in procedures to reconstruct social types of workers as objects of functional management. From this, it can be concluded that the previously-adopted technology for performing typological analysis of workers can be recommended for sociological assistance in processes of making management decisions at industrial enterprises. Accordingly, problems arise in finding management factors, which are without question specific to each business.
Keywords:
social type, functional management, typological analysis, workers, identification with the enterprise, the stability of the factor structure of variables, the stability of the cluster structure of workers

Author Biographies

Galina G. Tatarova, Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS
Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor, Chief Scientific Officer
Galina P. Bessokirnaya, Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher

References

Bessokirnaja G.P., Tatarova G.G. Identifikacija s predprijatiem: konceptual'naja model' i instrumentarij issledovanija [Identification with the enterprise: conceptual model and research tools] [Elektronnyj resurs]. Sputnik ezhegodnika «Rossija reformirujushhajasja». Vyp. 2014 / IS RAN. M.: IS RAN publ., 2014. 1 CD ROM. (In Russ.).



Bessokirnaja G.P., Tatarova G. G. Social'nye tipy rabochih kak ob'ekty upravlenija [Social types of work as objects of control]. Sovremennyj menedzhment: problemy, gipotezy, issledovanija: Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 3. Ch. 2. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki publ., 2011. P. 253–264. (In Russ.).



Bessokirnaja G.P., Temnickij A.L. Rabochie v reformirujushhejsja Rossii kak ob'ekt upravlenija i sub'ekt truda [Workers in reforming Russia as an object of management and subject of work]. Mir Rossii. 2013. T. 22. № 3. P. 115–151. (In Russ.).



Zdravomyslov A.G., Jadov V.A. Chelovek i ego rabota v SSSR i posle: Ucheb. posobie dlja vuzov. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. [Man and his work in the USSR and after: Studies. manual for universities]. M.: Aspekt Press publ., 2003. 485 p. (In Russ.).



Karahanova T.M., Bessokirnaja G.P., Bol'shakova O.A. Trud i dosug rabochih (programma, instrumentarij i nekotorye predvaritel'nye rezul'taty povtornogo issledovanija) [Work and leisure work (the program, the instrumentation and some preliminary results of a second study)]. [Elektronnyy resurs]. M.: IS RAN publ., 2014. 162 p. Oficial'nyj sajt IC RAN. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=3224 (Data obrashhenija: 16.01.2018). (In Russ.).



Lapin N.I. Problemy formirovanija koncepcii i chelovecheskih izmerenij strategii pojetapnoj modernizacii Rossii i ejo regionov [Problems of formation of the concept and human dimensions of the strategy of gradual modernization of Russia and its regions]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2014. № 7. P. 8–19. (In Russ.).



Nejmer Ju.L. Ot krizisa obshhestva k krizisu truda [From the crisis of society to the crisis of labor]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 1992. № 5. P. 23–32. (In Russ.).



Patrushev V.D., Bessokirnaja G.P. Trud, byt i otdyh (voprosnik dlja rabochih) [Work, life and leisure (questionnaire for workers)]. Cennosti povsednevnoj dejatel'nosti gorozhan. Ed. by T.M. Karahanova. M.: IS RAN, 2004. P. 117–133. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G. Metodologija empiricheskoj sociologii: ambivalentnost' faktorov razvitija [The methodology of empirical sociology: ambivalence of the factors in the development]. Sociologija: metodologija, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 2008. № 27. P. 5–29. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. Identifikacija s predprijatiem: indeksy dlja tipologicheskogo analiza rabotnikov [Identification with the enterprise: indexes for typological analysis of workers]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Sputnik ezhegodnika «Rossija reformirujushhajasja». Vyp. 2014. M.: IS RAN publ., 2014a. 1 CD ROM. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. Identifikacija s predprijatiem: klassifikacija rabotnikov i vyjavlenie upravljaemyh faktorov trudovoj dejatel'nosti [Identification with the enterprise: classification of employees and identification of managed factors of labor activity]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Sputnik ezhegodnika «Rossija reformirujushhajasja». Vyp. 2-2015. M.: IS RAN publ., 2016a. 1 CD ROM. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. O formirovanii bazovyh tipoobrazujushhih priznakov dlja vyjavlenija social'nyh tipov rabotnikov kak ob′ektov upravlenija [On the formation of basic toobrush signs to identify types of social workers as objects of control]. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika. 2014b. № 1 (5). P. 32−50. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. Predmetno-orientirovannyj podhod k «bor'be» s propushhennymi dannymi [A case-by-case approach to" dealing " with missing data]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2017a. № 12. S. 42–54. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517120054. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. Tipologicheskij analiz dlja rekonstrukcii social'nyh tipov rabotnikov (konceptual'noe i jempiricheskoe obosnovanie) [Typological analysis for the reconstruction of social types of workers (conceptual and empirical justification)]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2011. № 7. P. 3−15. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. Tipologicheskij analiz najomnyh rabotnikov v kontekste ih social'noj adaptacii [Typological analysis of employees in the context of their social adaptation]. Rossija reformirujushhajasja. Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 2014. Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov. M.: Novyj hronograf, 2016b. P. 21–49. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. Tipologicheskij analiz rabochih po ih otnosheniju k trudu [Typological analysis of workers in relation to their work]. Sociologija: metodologija, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 2010. № 31. P. 64–91. (In Russ.).



Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaja G.P. Udovletvorjonnost' rabotoj kak konstrukt v jempiricheskih issledovanijah [Satisfaction with working as a construct in empirical studies]. Sociologicheskij zhurnal. 2017b. T. 23. № 1. P. 8–26. (In Russ.).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Tatarova, G. G. and Bessokirnaya, G. P. (2018) ’On the Reliability of Measurements in the Process of Reconstructing Social Types of Workers as Objects of Management’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 6(2), pp. 52-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2018.6.2.5856.