Formation of Civic Responsibility in Russia
Acknowledgments
The article was prepared with the support of the RFBR and ANO EISI. Project No. 19-011-31091 “The Institutional context of formation of civil responsibility in Russia»
How to Cite
Patrushev S.V., Kuchinov A.M., Miryasova O.A., Nedyak I.L., Pavlova T.V., Filippova L.E. 2020. Formation of Civic Responsibility in Russia — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 27-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.1.7093
Abstract
The concept of civic responsibility is poorly studied by modern political science and is not sufficiently used in the analysis of the Russian political situation. This article attempts to develop the concept of civic responsibility as a category in political science using political, sociological and institutional approaches. The scientific novelty lies in the deployment of the concept of civic responsibility in the institutional context of civil society and the state. The identification of the normative and value structure of civic responsibility and its congruence in the institutional environment and the assessment of the development potential of civic responsibility will allow the better understanding of Russian politics and Russian society, as well as the expansion of the possibilities for influencing the process of the formation of civic responsibility as a stable foundation of modern politics. For empirical verification of theoretical assumptions, we used the data of an all-Russian representative survey of the population aged 18 years and older conducted by the comparative political research department of the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (with the support of the Center of Social Forecasting and Marketing) in June 2019. The size of the sampled population was 700 people (OSPI-2019).
Keywords:
citizen, responsibility, society, state, politics, institutional environment, order, law, norms, values, activity, behavior, formation, reproduction
References
Arendt X. (2013). Otvetstvennost’ i sujdenie. [Responsibility and Judgment]. M.: Izd. Instituta Gaidara publ., 352 p. (In Russ.).
Aristotel’. (1983). Sochineniya: v 4 tomakh. [Works]: T. 4. M.: Musl’ publ., 830 p. (In Russ.).
Aronson D. (2013). Sposobnost’ sujdeniya i ee svyz’ s politicheskoi otvetstvennost’u. Predislovie. Otvetstvennost’ I suzhdenije. [The ability to reason and its relation to political responsibility. Foreword]. M.: Izd. Instituta Gaidara publ., P. 7–24. (In Russ.).
Ayvazyan A. A. (2001). Grajdanstvennost’ i grajdanskoe uchastie: teoretiko-metodologicheskii analis. [Citizenship and Civil Participation: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis]. Ekaterinburg publ., 140 p. (In Russ.).
Baranov G. V. (2016). Kontsepziya sotsial’noi otvetstvennost’i v grazdanskom obshchestve Rossii [The concept of social responsibility in the civil society of Russia]. Mejdunarodnii nauchno-isskedovatel’skii jurnal. № 2 (44). Part 1. P. 64–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/IRJ.2016.44.097 (In Russ.).
Baranovskaya L. A. (2008). O tsennosnoi strukture sotsialnoi otvetstvennosti. [On the value structure of social responsibility]. Sibirskii Pedagogicheskii Jurnal. №1. P. 204–212. (In Russ.).
Buravoj M. (2009). Chto delat’? Tezisy o degradacii social’nogo bytiya v globaliziruyuschemsya mire. [What to do? Theses on the degradation of social life in a globalizing world]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 4. P. 3–9. (In Russ.).
Frolova E. A. (2010). O suschnosti sotsial’noi otvetstvennosti ekonomicheskih sub’ektov. [On the essence of social responsibility of economic entities]. Buletin of Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. № 4 (12). P. 59–68. (In Russ.).
Fukidid. (1981). Istoriya. [History]. M.: Nauka publ., Kniga II. 544 p. (In Russ.).
Grazhdanskaya aktivnost’. (2019). [Civil activity]. Levada-Tsentr. Press vypusk. 13.02.2019. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2019/02/13/grazhdanskaya-aktivnost/ (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019). (In Russ.).
Held D. (2014). Modeli Democratii. [Models of Democracy]. M.: Delo publ., 548 p. (In Russ.).
Kant I. (1995). Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. [Criticism of practical reason]. Sankt-Peterburg, «Nauka» publ., 528 p. (In Russ.).
Koreshkov S. S. (2012). Problemi razvitiya grajdanskoi otvetstvennosti v sovremennom objestve. [Problems of development of civil responsibility in modern society]. Obschestvo: sociologiya, psychologiya, pedagogika. № 2. P. 104–107. (In Russ.).
Mukhametshina E. (2018). Otvetstvennost’ rossiyan za proiskhodyaschee v strane rezko vyroslay. [The responsibility of Russians for what is happening in the country has grown dramatically]. Vedomosti. 30.10.2018. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2018/10/30/785180-rossiyane-pochuvstvovali-otvetstvennost-za-proishodyaschee-strane (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019). (In Russ.).
Otvetstvennost’ i vliyanie. (2019). [Responsibility and influence]. Levada-Tsentr. Press relize. 10.22.2019. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2019/10/22/otvetstvennost-i-vliyanie-3/ (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019). (In Russ.).
Polukhin O. N. (2005). Grazhdanstvennost’ kak predmet politologicheskogo analysa. [Citizenship as a subject of political science analysi]. M., 355 p. (In Russ.).
Russo Zh. Zh. (1998). Ob obschestvennom dogovore. Traktaty. [About the social contract. Treatises]. M.: «KANON-press», «Kuchkovo pole» publ., 416 p. (In Russ.).
Skalina A. N. (2009). Grazhdanstvo v sovremennoi Rossii: suschnost’, struktura, tipologiya. [Citizenship in modern Russia: essence, structure, typology]. Ufa, 155 p. (In Russ.).
Solov’ev A. I. (2019). Politicheskaya povestka pravitel’stva, ili zachem gosudarstvu obschestvo. [Political agenda of the government, or why the state needs society]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 4. P. 8–25. (In Russ.).
Turchinov A. I., Magomedov K. O. (2010). Kadrovyj potencial gosudarstvennoj grazhdanskoj sluzhby: dukhovno-nravstvennye problemy. [Personnel potential of the state civil service: spiritual and moral problems]. M.: Izd-vo RAGS publ., 120 p. (In Russ.).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 19 dekabrya 2012 № 1666 (red. ot 06.12.2018) «O Strategii gosudarstven-noj nacional’noj politiki Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2025 goda». [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 19, 2012 No. 1666 (ed. from 06.12.2018) “on the Strategy of the state national policy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025»]. URL: http://www. consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=312941&fld=134&dst=100017,0&r nd=0.7637317694010526#07698178056752676 (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019).
Zidentop L. (2001). Demokratia v Europe. [Democracy in Europe]. M.: Logos publ., 312 p. (In Russ.).
A Practical Guide for Integrating Civic Responsibility into the Curriculum. (2002). Washington, D.C.: Community College Press, 86 p.
Citizenship, Markets, and the State. (2001). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 296 p.
Crouch C. (2013). Europe and Problems of Marketization. From Polanyi to Scharpf. Firenze: Firenze University Press., 68 p.
Hague M. S. (2008). Global Rise of Neoliberal State and its Impact on Citizenship: Experiences in Developing Nations. Asian Journal of Social Science. № 36. P. 11–34.
Taylor Ch. (1993). Reconciling the solitudes: Essays in Canadian Federalism and Nationalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 208 p.
Aristotel’. (1983). Sochineniya: v 4 tomakh. [Works]: T. 4. M.: Musl’ publ., 830 p. (In Russ.).
Aronson D. (2013). Sposobnost’ sujdeniya i ee svyz’ s politicheskoi otvetstvennost’u. Predislovie. Otvetstvennost’ I suzhdenije. [The ability to reason and its relation to political responsibility. Foreword]. M.: Izd. Instituta Gaidara publ., P. 7–24. (In Russ.).
Ayvazyan A. A. (2001). Grajdanstvennost’ i grajdanskoe uchastie: teoretiko-metodologicheskii analis. [Citizenship and Civil Participation: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis]. Ekaterinburg publ., 140 p. (In Russ.).
Baranov G. V. (2016). Kontsepziya sotsial’noi otvetstvennost’i v grazdanskom obshchestve Rossii [The concept of social responsibility in the civil society of Russia]. Mejdunarodnii nauchno-isskedovatel’skii jurnal. № 2 (44). Part 1. P. 64–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/IRJ.2016.44.097 (In Russ.).
Baranovskaya L. A. (2008). O tsennosnoi strukture sotsialnoi otvetstvennosti. [On the value structure of social responsibility]. Sibirskii Pedagogicheskii Jurnal. №1. P. 204–212. (In Russ.).
Buravoj M. (2009). Chto delat’? Tezisy o degradacii social’nogo bytiya v globaliziruyuschemsya mire. [What to do? Theses on the degradation of social life in a globalizing world]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 4. P. 3–9. (In Russ.).
Frolova E. A. (2010). O suschnosti sotsial’noi otvetstvennosti ekonomicheskih sub’ektov. [On the essence of social responsibility of economic entities]. Buletin of Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. № 4 (12). P. 59–68. (In Russ.).
Fukidid. (1981). Istoriya. [History]. M.: Nauka publ., Kniga II. 544 p. (In Russ.).
Grazhdanskaya aktivnost’. (2019). [Civil activity]. Levada-Tsentr. Press vypusk. 13.02.2019. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2019/02/13/grazhdanskaya-aktivnost/ (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019). (In Russ.).
Held D. (2014). Modeli Democratii. [Models of Democracy]. M.: Delo publ., 548 p. (In Russ.).
Kant I. (1995). Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. [Criticism of practical reason]. Sankt-Peterburg, «Nauka» publ., 528 p. (In Russ.).
Koreshkov S. S. (2012). Problemi razvitiya grajdanskoi otvetstvennosti v sovremennom objestve. [Problems of development of civil responsibility in modern society]. Obschestvo: sociologiya, psychologiya, pedagogika. № 2. P. 104–107. (In Russ.).
Mukhametshina E. (2018). Otvetstvennost’ rossiyan za proiskhodyaschee v strane rezko vyroslay. [The responsibility of Russians for what is happening in the country has grown dramatically]. Vedomosti. 30.10.2018. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2018/10/30/785180-rossiyane-pochuvstvovali-otvetstvennost-za-proishodyaschee-strane (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019). (In Russ.).
Otvetstvennost’ i vliyanie. (2019). [Responsibility and influence]. Levada-Tsentr. Press relize. 10.22.2019. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2019/10/22/otvetstvennost-i-vliyanie-3/ (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019). (In Russ.).
Polukhin O. N. (2005). Grazhdanstvennost’ kak predmet politologicheskogo analysa. [Citizenship as a subject of political science analysi]. M., 355 p. (In Russ.).
Russo Zh. Zh. (1998). Ob obschestvennom dogovore. Traktaty. [About the social contract. Treatises]. M.: «KANON-press», «Kuchkovo pole» publ., 416 p. (In Russ.).
Skalina A. N. (2009). Grazhdanstvo v sovremennoi Rossii: suschnost’, struktura, tipologiya. [Citizenship in modern Russia: essence, structure, typology]. Ufa, 155 p. (In Russ.).
Solov’ev A. I. (2019). Politicheskaya povestka pravitel’stva, ili zachem gosudarstvu obschestvo. [Political agenda of the government, or why the state needs society]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 4. P. 8–25. (In Russ.).
Turchinov A. I., Magomedov K. O. (2010). Kadrovyj potencial gosudarstvennoj grazhdanskoj sluzhby: dukhovno-nravstvennye problemy. [Personnel potential of the state civil service: spiritual and moral problems]. M.: Izd-vo RAGS publ., 120 p. (In Russ.).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 19 dekabrya 2012 № 1666 (red. ot 06.12.2018) «O Strategii gosudarstven-noj nacional’noj politiki Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2025 goda». [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 19, 2012 No. 1666 (ed. from 06.12.2018) “on the Strategy of the state national policy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025»]. URL: http://www. consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=312941&fld=134&dst=100017,0&r nd=0.7637317694010526#07698178056752676 (data obrascheniya: 08.10.2019).
Zidentop L. (2001). Demokratia v Europe. [Democracy in Europe]. M.: Logos publ., 312 p. (In Russ.).
A Practical Guide for Integrating Civic Responsibility into the Curriculum. (2002). Washington, D.C.: Community College Press, 86 p.
Citizenship, Markets, and the State. (2001). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 296 p.
Crouch C. (2013). Europe and Problems of Marketization. From Polanyi to Scharpf. Firenze: Firenze University Press., 68 p.
Hague M. S. (2008). Global Rise of Neoliberal State and its Impact on Citizenship: Experiences in Developing Nations. Asian Journal of Social Science. № 36. P. 11–34.
Taylor Ch. (1993). Reconciling the solitudes: Essays in Canadian Federalism and Nationalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 208 p.
Article
Received: 25.11.2019
Accepted: 01.04.2020
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Patrushev, S. V., Kuchinov, A. M., Miryasova, O. A., Nedyak, I. L., Pavlova, T. V. and Filippova, L. E. (2020) ’Formation of Civic Responsibility in Russia’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 8(1), pp. 27-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.1.7093.
Section
MODERN RUSSIAN SOCIETY
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)