Employment in Personal Subsidiary Farms of the South Russian Regions: Results of the Study
Research Article
How to Cite
Namrueva L.V. 2020. Employment in Personal Subsidiary Farms of the South Russian Regions: Results of the Study — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 77-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.3.7488
Abstract
In modern conditions of new threats that destabilize social interaction, it is necessary to search for those factors that restore its stability of social interaction and increase the food security of society. One of them, in our opinion, is the economic patterns that traditionally exist in rural society. This article discusses one of the rural economic systems-personal subsidiary farms, which not only preserve rural territories, but also continue to provide the population with food, provide a decent level of income for the rural population, contributing to the solution of many life problems.
The author analyzes the results of a sociological study conducted in the fall of 2018 in four southern Russian regions – the Republic of Kalmykia, the Astrakhan and Volgograd regions, and the Stavropol territory. This is the first large – scale study of rural diversity in the South of Russia. The author analyzes employment in the family-consumer mode, which characterizes the process of reforming the agro-industrial complex and the ongoing structural changes in the agricultural labor market. The questionnaire survey showed that in southern Russian villages, the family-consumer mode (personal subsidiary farms) has not lost its dominance, despite the emergence of such a strong actor as peasant farms, representing the family-business mode and supported by the state. Employment in private farms is primarily due to their economic resources, specialization, including different levels of marketability. The study showed that there is a significant part of the owners who are ready to expand their production, despite the existing difficulties in the socio-economic development of the country, region, or specific village.
Keywords:
Republic of Kalmykia, Astrakhan region, Volgograd region, Stavropol territory, private subsidiary farms, village, rural residents, agricultural production
References
Velikij P. P. (2018). Khozyajstvennaya samodeyatelnost` selskikh semej: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya. [Economic self-activity of rural families: opportunities and limitations]. Regionalnye agrosistemy: ekonomika i sotsiologiya. № 2. P. (In Russ.).
Velikiy P. P. (2019a). Khozyaeva sel`skikh podvorij: differenciaciya, problemy, buduschee. [Owners of rural farmsteads: differentiation, problems, future]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 12. P. 49–64. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007734-0
Velikiy P. P. (2019b). Sotsialnaya differenciatsiya v selskikh soobshhestvakh: opyt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. [Social differentiation in rural communities: experience of sociological research]. Ustojchivoe razvitie sel`skikh territorij. Stabil`naya sotsial`no-ekonomicheskaya struktura sela kak predposylka ustojchivogo razvitiya sel`skikh territorij. Krasnodar publ., P. 51–64. (In Russ.).
Velikiy P. P. (2020). Povsednevnost` rossijskogo sela v nachale XXI veka. [Everyday life of the Russian village at the beginning of the XXI century]. Saratov publ., 307 p. (In Russ.).
Zazulina M. R., Samsonov V. V. (2017). Podsobnye khozyajstva naseleniya v strategiyakh ustojchivogo razvitiya rossijskogo sela: opyt statisticheskogo analiza. [Subsidiary farms of the population in strategies of sustainable development of the Russian village: experience of statistical analysis]. Eksportnyj potencial APK Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy. Nikonovskie chteniya. M: VIAPI imeni A. A. Nikonova publ., P. 289–290. (In Russ.).
Zubarevich N. V. (2017). Razvitie rossijskogo prostranstva: bar`ery` i vozmozhnosti regional`noj politiki. [Development of the Russian space: barriers and opportunities of regional policy]. Mir novoj ekonomiki. № 2. P. 46–57. (In Russ.).
Isaeva O. V. (2019). Mnogoukladnost` sel`skogo khozyajstva Rossii: sovremennye tendencii i perspektivy` razvitiya. [The diversity of agriculture of Russia: modern tendencies and prospects of development]. Ekonomika i ekologiya territorial`ny`kh obrazovanij. T. 3. № 3. P. 20–30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23947/2413-1474-2019-3-3-20-30
Itogi Vserossijskoj selskokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2006 goda: V 9 t. Chislo ob`ektov Vserossijskoj selskokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2006 goda. Trudovye resursy i ikh kharakteristika. T. 2. (2008). [Results of the all-Russian agricultural census of 2006: In 9 t. the Number of objects of the all-Russian agricultural census of 2006. Labor resources and their characteristics]. Federal`naya sluzhba gos. Statistiki. M.: IICz «Statistika Rossii» publ., 432 p. (In Russ.).
Iczkovich A. Yu. (2013). Lichnye podsobnye khozyajstva: konflikt efinicij, tipologij, patternov. [Personal subsidiary farms: conflict of definitions, typologies, and patterns]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 3. Ekonomika. Ekologiya. № 2(23). P. 157–164. (In Russ.).
Kalugina Z. I. (2016). Mnogoukladnost` agrarnoj ekonomiki v kontekste racional`nogo ispol`zovaniya resursov. [Multiculturality of the agricultural economy in the context of rational use of resources]. INTEREKSPO Geo-Sibir`. T. 3. № 1. P. 128–132. (In Russ.).
Mukhanova M. N. (2018). Selskoe naselenie v strukturakh neformal`nogo sektora na rynke truda APK. [Rural population in the structures of the informal sector in the agricultural labor market]. Vlast`. No 5. P. 125–132. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V., Korolevskikh A. N. (2016). O prostesse umensheniya chislennosti krestyan v sovremennoj Kalmykii. [On the process of reducing the number of peasants in modern Kalmykia]. Izvestiya vysshix uchebnykh zavedenij. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika. № 3. P. 26–29. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V. (2014). Vliyanie proizvodstvennoj nishi na izmenenie etnichnosti. [Influence of the production niche on the change of ethnicity]. Vestnik Kalmytszkogo instituta gumanitarnykh issledovanij RAN. № 2. P. 109–114. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V. (2017). Sel`skie territorii Respubliki Kalmykiya: dinamika izmenenij. [Rural territories of the Republic of Kalmykia: dynamics of changes] Sovremennoe selo Kalmy`kii: sotsiologicheskij srez. Monograph. Elista: Kalm SC of RAS publ., P. 65–77. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V. (2019). Vzaimodejstvie kollektivnogo i semejnogo ukladov v yuzhnorossijskikh selakh (po materialam issledovaniya 2018 g.). [Interaction of collective and family structures in southern Russian villages (based on the 2018 study)]. Logos et Praxis. № 2. P. 134–141. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2019.2.12
Namrueva L. V., Nuskhaeva B. B., Badmaeva N. V. Razvitie selskikh territorij Yuga Rossii: kompleksnyj analiz sotsialno-ekonomicheskih protsessov. [Rural development in the South of Russia: a comprehensive analysis of socio-economic processes]. Elista: KalmNC RAN publ. (In Russ.).
Nefedova T. G. (2002). Tri uklada sovremennogo sel`skogo khozyajstva Rossii: spetsifika i vzaimodejstvie. [Three ways of modern Russian agriculture: specifics and interaction] Vestnik Evrazii. № 1 (16). P. 7–26. (In Russ.).
Praust R. E. (2008). Apologiya i problematika semejnogo sel`skogo khozyajstva. Istoricheskie i sotsial`no-ekonomicheskie ocherki. [The apology and the issues of family agriculture. Historical and socio-economic essays]. M.: VIAPI: «Entsiklopediya rossijskikh dereven’» publ. (In Russ.).
Predvaritelnye itogi Vserossijskoj sel’skokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2016 goda: V 2 t. Federalnaya sluzhba gos. statistiki. M.: IICz «Statistika Rossii» (2017). T. 2 Predvaritel`ny`e itogi Vserossijskoj selskokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2016 goda po subjektam Rossijskoj Federatsii. [Federal state service. statistics. Moscow: IIC “Statistics of Russia”. Vol. 2. Preliminary results of the all-Russian agricultural census of 2016 for the subjects of the Russian Federation]. 1110 p. (In Russ.).
Sangadzhieva V. (2020) «Agrostartap» pomozhet stat` fermerom. [“Agrostartup” will help you become of a farmer]. Xal’mg unn. January 22. P. 3. (In Russ).
Semenova V. V. (2003). Vozrast kak sotsialnyj resurs: vozmozhnye istochniki sotsialnogo neravenstva. [Age as a social resource: possible sources of social inequality] Rossiya reformiruyushhayasya. Ezhegodnik. M.: IS RAS publ., P. 213–237. (In Russ.).
Fadeeva O. P. (2015). Sel’skie soobshhestva i khozyajstvennye uklady: ot vyzhivaniya k razvitiyu. [Rural communities and economic structures: from survival to development]. Novosibirsk publ., 264 p. (In Russ.).
Federal`nyj zakon «O lichnom podsobnom khozyajstve» ot 7 iyulya 2003 g. [Federal law «On personal subsidiary farming» of July 7, 2003]. [Elektronny`j resurs] URL: http://base.garant.ru/12131702/ (data obrascheniya: 12.02.2018). (In Russ.).
Velikiy P. P. (2019a). Khozyaeva sel`skikh podvorij: differenciaciya, problemy, buduschee. [Owners of rural farmsteads: differentiation, problems, future]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 12. P. 49–64. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007734-0
Velikiy P. P. (2019b). Sotsialnaya differenciatsiya v selskikh soobshhestvakh: opyt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. [Social differentiation in rural communities: experience of sociological research]. Ustojchivoe razvitie sel`skikh territorij. Stabil`naya sotsial`no-ekonomicheskaya struktura sela kak predposylka ustojchivogo razvitiya sel`skikh territorij. Krasnodar publ., P. 51–64. (In Russ.).
Velikiy P. P. (2020). Povsednevnost` rossijskogo sela v nachale XXI veka. [Everyday life of the Russian village at the beginning of the XXI century]. Saratov publ., 307 p. (In Russ.).
Zazulina M. R., Samsonov V. V. (2017). Podsobnye khozyajstva naseleniya v strategiyakh ustojchivogo razvitiya rossijskogo sela: opyt statisticheskogo analiza. [Subsidiary farms of the population in strategies of sustainable development of the Russian village: experience of statistical analysis]. Eksportnyj potencial APK Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy. Nikonovskie chteniya. M: VIAPI imeni A. A. Nikonova publ., P. 289–290. (In Russ.).
Zubarevich N. V. (2017). Razvitie rossijskogo prostranstva: bar`ery` i vozmozhnosti regional`noj politiki. [Development of the Russian space: barriers and opportunities of regional policy]. Mir novoj ekonomiki. № 2. P. 46–57. (In Russ.).
Isaeva O. V. (2019). Mnogoukladnost` sel`skogo khozyajstva Rossii: sovremennye tendencii i perspektivy` razvitiya. [The diversity of agriculture of Russia: modern tendencies and prospects of development]. Ekonomika i ekologiya territorial`ny`kh obrazovanij. T. 3. № 3. P. 20–30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23947/2413-1474-2019-3-3-20-30
Itogi Vserossijskoj selskokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2006 goda: V 9 t. Chislo ob`ektov Vserossijskoj selskokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2006 goda. Trudovye resursy i ikh kharakteristika. T. 2. (2008). [Results of the all-Russian agricultural census of 2006: In 9 t. the Number of objects of the all-Russian agricultural census of 2006. Labor resources and their characteristics]. Federal`naya sluzhba gos. Statistiki. M.: IICz «Statistika Rossii» publ., 432 p. (In Russ.).
Iczkovich A. Yu. (2013). Lichnye podsobnye khozyajstva: konflikt efinicij, tipologij, patternov. [Personal subsidiary farms: conflict of definitions, typologies, and patterns]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 3. Ekonomika. Ekologiya. № 2(23). P. 157–164. (In Russ.).
Kalugina Z. I. (2016). Mnogoukladnost` agrarnoj ekonomiki v kontekste racional`nogo ispol`zovaniya resursov. [Multiculturality of the agricultural economy in the context of rational use of resources]. INTEREKSPO Geo-Sibir`. T. 3. № 1. P. 128–132. (In Russ.).
Mukhanova M. N. (2018). Selskoe naselenie v strukturakh neformal`nogo sektora na rynke truda APK. [Rural population in the structures of the informal sector in the agricultural labor market]. Vlast`. No 5. P. 125–132. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V., Korolevskikh A. N. (2016). O prostesse umensheniya chislennosti krestyan v sovremennoj Kalmykii. [On the process of reducing the number of peasants in modern Kalmykia]. Izvestiya vysshix uchebnykh zavedenij. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika. № 3. P. 26–29. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V. (2014). Vliyanie proizvodstvennoj nishi na izmenenie etnichnosti. [Influence of the production niche on the change of ethnicity]. Vestnik Kalmytszkogo instituta gumanitarnykh issledovanij RAN. № 2. P. 109–114. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V. (2017). Sel`skie territorii Respubliki Kalmykiya: dinamika izmenenij. [Rural territories of the Republic of Kalmykia: dynamics of changes] Sovremennoe selo Kalmy`kii: sotsiologicheskij srez. Monograph. Elista: Kalm SC of RAS publ., P. 65–77. (In Russ.).
Namrueva L. V. (2019). Vzaimodejstvie kollektivnogo i semejnogo ukladov v yuzhnorossijskikh selakh (po materialam issledovaniya 2018 g.). [Interaction of collective and family structures in southern Russian villages (based on the 2018 study)]. Logos et Praxis. № 2. P. 134–141. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2019.2.12
Namrueva L. V., Nuskhaeva B. B., Badmaeva N. V. Razvitie selskikh territorij Yuga Rossii: kompleksnyj analiz sotsialno-ekonomicheskih protsessov. [Rural development in the South of Russia: a comprehensive analysis of socio-economic processes]. Elista: KalmNC RAN publ. (In Russ.).
Nefedova T. G. (2002). Tri uklada sovremennogo sel`skogo khozyajstva Rossii: spetsifika i vzaimodejstvie. [Three ways of modern Russian agriculture: specifics and interaction] Vestnik Evrazii. № 1 (16). P. 7–26. (In Russ.).
Praust R. E. (2008). Apologiya i problematika semejnogo sel`skogo khozyajstva. Istoricheskie i sotsial`no-ekonomicheskie ocherki. [The apology and the issues of family agriculture. Historical and socio-economic essays]. M.: VIAPI: «Entsiklopediya rossijskikh dereven’» publ. (In Russ.).
Predvaritelnye itogi Vserossijskoj sel’skokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2016 goda: V 2 t. Federalnaya sluzhba gos. statistiki. M.: IICz «Statistika Rossii» (2017). T. 2 Predvaritel`ny`e itogi Vserossijskoj selskokhozyajstvennoj perepisi 2016 goda po subjektam Rossijskoj Federatsii. [Federal state service. statistics. Moscow: IIC “Statistics of Russia”. Vol. 2. Preliminary results of the all-Russian agricultural census of 2016 for the subjects of the Russian Federation]. 1110 p. (In Russ.).
Sangadzhieva V. (2020) «Agrostartap» pomozhet stat` fermerom. [“Agrostartup” will help you become of a farmer]. Xal’mg unn. January 22. P. 3. (In Russ).
Semenova V. V. (2003). Vozrast kak sotsialnyj resurs: vozmozhnye istochniki sotsialnogo neravenstva. [Age as a social resource: possible sources of social inequality] Rossiya reformiruyushhayasya. Ezhegodnik. M.: IS RAS publ., P. 213–237. (In Russ.).
Fadeeva O. P. (2015). Sel’skie soobshhestva i khozyajstvennye uklady: ot vyzhivaniya k razvitiyu. [Rural communities and economic structures: from survival to development]. Novosibirsk publ., 264 p. (In Russ.).
Federal`nyj zakon «O lichnom podsobnom khozyajstve» ot 7 iyulya 2003 g. [Federal law «On personal subsidiary farming» of July 7, 2003]. [Elektronny`j resurs] URL: http://base.garant.ru/12131702/ (data obrascheniya: 12.02.2018). (In Russ.).
Article
Received: 19.05.2020
Accepted: 25.09.2020
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Namrueva, L. V. (2020) ’Employment in Personal Subsidiary Farms of the South Russian Regions: Results of the Study’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 8(3), pp. 77-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.3.7488.
Section
SOCIOLOGY OF THE VILLAGE
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)