The Capacity of Target Groups of the Population as a Factor of Integration of the Social Space in a Locality
Research Article
How to Cite
Kharchenko K.V. 2021. The Capacity of Target Groups of the Population as a Factor of Integration of the Social Space in a Locality — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 124-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.1.7877
Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of the capacity of target groups of the population which are considered as a social base for the implementation of strategies of socioeconomic development. The aim of the study is to define the ways of identifying and tools of activating of the capacity of various groups of the population in relation to strategy planning and implementation. The capacity of target groups is considered in a context of the concept of capacity as a managerial category with its both objective and subjective senses. The capacity of target groups is identified among the various sorts of capacity of a territory. The concepts of target groups capacity and social capacity, social and labor capacity, social and target groups are correlated. The capacity of target groups is shown on the example of two certain localities: Mostovski raion (Krasnodar krai) and the city district of Megion (Khanty-Mansiysk autonomous okrug – Ugra). As a result of reflection analysis of the process and outcomes of strategic planning there were revealed more than ten target groups typical for both localities. Specific target groups were also identified. The role of each of group under the condition of both inertial and purposeful development of the locality was highlighted. The identification of target groups had let to classify them by the criteria of typicality, localization in relation to the borders of the locality, cohesion, presence in the real world / result of intent construction. It was proposed to form a ‘thesaurus’ of target groups to apply while analyzing the social potential of the other localities.
Keywords:
social capacity, social space, reflection analysis, target groups, strategic planning
References
1. Boikova O. I. (2011). Sotsial’nyj potentsial studencheskoj molodezhi: aktual’nye determinanty. [Social capacity of students: actual determinants]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya. № 2 (35). P. 162–166. (In Russ.)
2. Butorina A. A. (2014). Sotsial’nyj potentsial regiona: ponyatie i struktura. [Social capacity of a region: its concept and structure]. Vestnik social’no-politicheskih nauk. № 13. P. 12–14. (In Russ.)
3. Vnukovskiy M. V. (2012). Sotsial’nyj potentsial biznes-soobshchestva v usloviyah moderniziruemogo obshchestva. [Social capacity of businesspersons in the conditions of modernizing society]. Vlast’. № 2. P. 60–62. (In Russ.)
4. Daugavet A. B., Duka A. V., Tev D. B. (2016). The regional power groups: main sociostructural characteristics and innovation potential. [Russ. ed. : Regional’nye vlastnye gruppy: osnovnye social’no-strukturnye harakteristiki i innovacionnyj potencial]. Vlast’ i elity. Vol. 3. P. 121–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2016.3.5. (In Russ.)
5. Dementiev I. A. (2012). Sotsial’nyj potentsial severnogo sela. [Social capacity of the Northern countryside]. Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk. № 4-2 (26). P. 32–34. (In Russ.)
6. Doktorovich A. B. (2007). Sotsial’nyj potentsial kak predmet sistemnogo issledovaniya. [Social capacity as a subject of system-based study]. Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. № 3 (56). P. 179–189. (In Russ.)
7. Kurilovich N. V. (2017). The formation of readiness of gerontovolunteers to realization of voluntary activity. [Formirovanie gotovnosti gerontovolonterov k osushchestvleniyu dobrovol’cheskoj deyatel’nosti]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. Vol. 22. № 4 (168). P. 7–13. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0201-2017-22-4(168)-7-13. (In Russ.)
8. Lukash S. N., Epoeva K. V., Grishko A. L. (2019). The educational potential of the culture of cossacks: the formation of russian national identity. [Vospitatel’nyj potentsial kul’tury kazachestva: formirovanie rossijskoj natsional’noj identichnosti]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya. № 2 (75). P. 50–53. (In Russ.)
9. Lysenko O. I., Kokh M. N. (2018). Analiz sotsial’nogo potentsiala rabotnikov starshih vozrastnyh grupp sel’skogo hozyajstva v RF. [Analysis of social capacity of the aged agricultural workers in the Russian Federation]. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. № 44-4. P. 70–73. DOI: 10.18411/ lj-11-2018-102. (In Russ.)
10. Lytkina T. S. (2014). Sotsial’nyj potentsial severnogo goroda: ot ignorirovaniya k priznaniyu. [Social capacity of the Northern city: from ignoring to recognition]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noj antropologii. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 33–47. (In Russ.)
11. Markvart E. (2017). Participation of inhabitants in strategic planning – the burdensome duty or unsolved potential? [Russ. ed. : Uchastie zhitelej v strategicheskom planirovanii – obremenitel’naya obyazannost’ ili neraskrytyj potencial?]. Vestnik ekspertnogo soveta. № 2 (9). P. 26–32. (In Russ.)
12. Markin V. V., Silin A. N. (2017). Human and social potential of neo-industrial development of the Arctic: sociological analysis, modeling, and regulation. [Russ. ed. : Chelovecheskij i sotsial’nyj potentsial neoindustrial’nogo osvoenija Arktiki: sotsiologicheskij analiz, modelirovanie, regulirovanie]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. Vol. 10. № 6. P. 75–88. DOI: 10.15838/ esc/2017.6.54.5 (In Russ.)
13. Nugaev M. A. (2012). Sotsial’nyj potentsial i sotsial’nyj kapital regiona kak problema sotsiologicheskoj nauki: o ponyatiyah osnovnyh sfer obshchestvennoj zhizni. [Social capacity and social potential of a region as a sociological problem: on the concepts of the basic spheres of social life]. Nauchnye trudy Centra perspektivnyh ekonomicheskih issledovanij. № 5. P. 393–404. (In Russ.)
14. Promyslov B., Kulishova R., Aleshina T. (2007). Trudovoj potentsial rabotnikov pensionnogo vozrasta (metodologicheskie osnovy otsenki). [Labor capacity of the aged workers (methodological base of its estimation)]. Chelovek i trud. № 3. P. 67–70. (In Russ.)
15. Reutov E. V., Reutova M. N. (2016). Trust to municipal authority and integration of social space of local community. [Russ. ed. : Doverie k municipal’noj vlasti i integraciya social’nogo prostranstva mestnogo soobshchestva]. Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk. Vol. 11. № 5. P. 12–21. DOI: 10.12737/22689. (In Russ.)
16. Skalaban I. A. (2011). Strategii sotsial’nogo kartirovaniya obshchestvennogo uchastiya: sotsial’no-territorial’nyj kontekst. [Strategies of social mapping of public participation: socio-territorial context]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sociologiya. № 2. P. 24–36. (In Russ.)
17. Timoshenko M. A. (2017). labor potential of retirees as a factor in the socio-economic development of rural territories. [Trudovoj potencial pensionerov kak faktor social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya sel’skih territoriy]. Nauchnoe obozrenie. № 21. P. 125–131. (In Russ.)
18. Trubitsina L. V. (2019). Slightly structured interview as a method of qualitative research in psychology. [Russ. ed. : Slabostrukturirovannoe interv’yu kak metod kachestvennogo issledovaniya v psihologii]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psihologiya. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 72–84. (In Russ.)
19. Fayzullin T. F. (2015). Sushchnost’ i soderzhanie kategorii ‘sotsial’nyj potentsial regiona’. [The essence and structure of the category ‘social capacity of a region’]. Vestnik VEGU. № 3 (77). P. 63–68. (In Russ.).
20. Kharchenko K. V. (2018). Solidarity society as a landmark of project activity. [Russ. ed. : Solidarnoe obshchestvo kak orientir proektnoj deyatel’nosti]. Upravlenie gorodom: teoriya i praktika. № 4 (31). P. 12–17. (In Russ.)
21. Cheban V. A. (2020). Public participation in strategic planning. The role of participativity in the formation of the russian model of public administration. [Russ. ed. : Obshchestvennoe uchastie v strategicheskom planirovanii. Rol’ partisipativnosti v voprose stanovleniya rossijskoj modeli publichnogo upravleniya]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gumanitarno-ekonomicheskogo instituta. № 1. P. 247–263. (In Russ.)
22. Adams R. (1996). Empowering Community Groups and Organizations. Social Work and Empowerment. Practical Social Work. Palgrave, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-34914033-6_7.
23. Boehm A. (2008). The involvement of university faculty members in social planning: motivating and hindering factors. High Education. Vol. 56. P. 659–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10734-008-9117-5.
24. Gremillion H. (2013). Developing a collaborative methodology for research with community groups. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. Vol. 8. No. 1-2. P. 74–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2013.848215.
25. Najimi B. (2018). Status of Public Participation in Planning, Budgeting and Oversight. In: Gender and Public Participation in Afghanistan. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-74977-8_5.
26. Pazhuhan M., Fathi S. (2019). Women and strategic urban planning in Tehran: channeling women’s social capacity to prepare city development strategies. GeoJournal. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s10708-019-10086-2.
27. Ragusa A. T. (2013). Downshifting or Conspicuous Consumption? A Sociological Examination of Treechange as a Manifestation of Slow Culture. In: Osbaldiston N. (ed.) Culture of the Slow. Consumption and Public Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1057/9781137319449_7.
28. Twelvetrees A. (1991). The Community Development Process II: Working with Community Groups. In: Community Work. Practical Social Work. Palgrave, London. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-349-21262-0_3.
29. Wolf M., Söbke H., Wehking F. (2020). Mixed Reality Media-Enabled Public Participation in Urban Planning. In: Jung T., tom Dieck M., Rauschnabel P. (eds) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_11.
2. Butorina A. A. (2014). Sotsial’nyj potentsial regiona: ponyatie i struktura. [Social capacity of a region: its concept and structure]. Vestnik social’no-politicheskih nauk. № 13. P. 12–14. (In Russ.)
3. Vnukovskiy M. V. (2012). Sotsial’nyj potentsial biznes-soobshchestva v usloviyah moderniziruemogo obshchestva. [Social capacity of businesspersons in the conditions of modernizing society]. Vlast’. № 2. P. 60–62. (In Russ.)
4. Daugavet A. B., Duka A. V., Tev D. B. (2016). The regional power groups: main sociostructural characteristics and innovation potential. [Russ. ed. : Regional’nye vlastnye gruppy: osnovnye social’no-strukturnye harakteristiki i innovacionnyj potencial]. Vlast’ i elity. Vol. 3. P. 121–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2016.3.5. (In Russ.)
5. Dementiev I. A. (2012). Sotsial’nyj potentsial severnogo sela. [Social capacity of the Northern countryside]. Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk. № 4-2 (26). P. 32–34. (In Russ.)
6. Doktorovich A. B. (2007). Sotsial’nyj potentsial kak predmet sistemnogo issledovaniya. [Social capacity as a subject of system-based study]. Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. № 3 (56). P. 179–189. (In Russ.)
7. Kurilovich N. V. (2017). The formation of readiness of gerontovolunteers to realization of voluntary activity. [Formirovanie gotovnosti gerontovolonterov k osushchestvleniyu dobrovol’cheskoj deyatel’nosti]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. Vol. 22. № 4 (168). P. 7–13. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0201-2017-22-4(168)-7-13. (In Russ.)
8. Lukash S. N., Epoeva K. V., Grishko A. L. (2019). The educational potential of the culture of cossacks: the formation of russian national identity. [Vospitatel’nyj potentsial kul’tury kazachestva: formirovanie rossijskoj natsional’noj identichnosti]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya. № 2 (75). P. 50–53. (In Russ.)
9. Lysenko O. I., Kokh M. N. (2018). Analiz sotsial’nogo potentsiala rabotnikov starshih vozrastnyh grupp sel’skogo hozyajstva v RF. [Analysis of social capacity of the aged agricultural workers in the Russian Federation]. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. № 44-4. P. 70–73. DOI: 10.18411/ lj-11-2018-102. (In Russ.)
10. Lytkina T. S. (2014). Sotsial’nyj potentsial severnogo goroda: ot ignorirovaniya k priznaniyu. [Social capacity of the Northern city: from ignoring to recognition]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noj antropologii. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 33–47. (In Russ.)
11. Markvart E. (2017). Participation of inhabitants in strategic planning – the burdensome duty or unsolved potential? [Russ. ed. : Uchastie zhitelej v strategicheskom planirovanii – obremenitel’naya obyazannost’ ili neraskrytyj potencial?]. Vestnik ekspertnogo soveta. № 2 (9). P. 26–32. (In Russ.)
12. Markin V. V., Silin A. N. (2017). Human and social potential of neo-industrial development of the Arctic: sociological analysis, modeling, and regulation. [Russ. ed. : Chelovecheskij i sotsial’nyj potentsial neoindustrial’nogo osvoenija Arktiki: sotsiologicheskij analiz, modelirovanie, regulirovanie]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. Vol. 10. № 6. P. 75–88. DOI: 10.15838/ esc/2017.6.54.5 (In Russ.)
13. Nugaev M. A. (2012). Sotsial’nyj potentsial i sotsial’nyj kapital regiona kak problema sotsiologicheskoj nauki: o ponyatiyah osnovnyh sfer obshchestvennoj zhizni. [Social capacity and social potential of a region as a sociological problem: on the concepts of the basic spheres of social life]. Nauchnye trudy Centra perspektivnyh ekonomicheskih issledovanij. № 5. P. 393–404. (In Russ.)
14. Promyslov B., Kulishova R., Aleshina T. (2007). Trudovoj potentsial rabotnikov pensionnogo vozrasta (metodologicheskie osnovy otsenki). [Labor capacity of the aged workers (methodological base of its estimation)]. Chelovek i trud. № 3. P. 67–70. (In Russ.)
15. Reutov E. V., Reutova M. N. (2016). Trust to municipal authority and integration of social space of local community. [Russ. ed. : Doverie k municipal’noj vlasti i integraciya social’nogo prostranstva mestnogo soobshchestva]. Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk. Vol. 11. № 5. P. 12–21. DOI: 10.12737/22689. (In Russ.)
16. Skalaban I. A. (2011). Strategii sotsial’nogo kartirovaniya obshchestvennogo uchastiya: sotsial’no-territorial’nyj kontekst. [Strategies of social mapping of public participation: socio-territorial context]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sociologiya. № 2. P. 24–36. (In Russ.)
17. Timoshenko M. A. (2017). labor potential of retirees as a factor in the socio-economic development of rural territories. [Trudovoj potencial pensionerov kak faktor social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya sel’skih territoriy]. Nauchnoe obozrenie. № 21. P. 125–131. (In Russ.)
18. Trubitsina L. V. (2019). Slightly structured interview as a method of qualitative research in psychology. [Russ. ed. : Slabostrukturirovannoe interv’yu kak metod kachestvennogo issledovaniya v psihologii]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psihologiya. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 72–84. (In Russ.)
19. Fayzullin T. F. (2015). Sushchnost’ i soderzhanie kategorii ‘sotsial’nyj potentsial regiona’. [The essence and structure of the category ‘social capacity of a region’]. Vestnik VEGU. № 3 (77). P. 63–68. (In Russ.).
20. Kharchenko K. V. (2018). Solidarity society as a landmark of project activity. [Russ. ed. : Solidarnoe obshchestvo kak orientir proektnoj deyatel’nosti]. Upravlenie gorodom: teoriya i praktika. № 4 (31). P. 12–17. (In Russ.)
21. Cheban V. A. (2020). Public participation in strategic planning. The role of participativity in the formation of the russian model of public administration. [Russ. ed. : Obshchestvennoe uchastie v strategicheskom planirovanii. Rol’ partisipativnosti v voprose stanovleniya rossijskoj modeli publichnogo upravleniya]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gumanitarno-ekonomicheskogo instituta. № 1. P. 247–263. (In Russ.)
22. Adams R. (1996). Empowering Community Groups and Organizations. Social Work and Empowerment. Practical Social Work. Palgrave, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-34914033-6_7.
23. Boehm A. (2008). The involvement of university faculty members in social planning: motivating and hindering factors. High Education. Vol. 56. P. 659–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10734-008-9117-5.
24. Gremillion H. (2013). Developing a collaborative methodology for research with community groups. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. Vol. 8. No. 1-2. P. 74–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2013.848215.
25. Najimi B. (2018). Status of Public Participation in Planning, Budgeting and Oversight. In: Gender and Public Participation in Afghanistan. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-74977-8_5.
26. Pazhuhan M., Fathi S. (2019). Women and strategic urban planning in Tehran: channeling women’s social capacity to prepare city development strategies. GeoJournal. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s10708-019-10086-2.
27. Ragusa A. T. (2013). Downshifting or Conspicuous Consumption? A Sociological Examination of Treechange as a Manifestation of Slow Culture. In: Osbaldiston N. (ed.) Culture of the Slow. Consumption and Public Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1057/9781137319449_7.
28. Twelvetrees A. (1991). The Community Development Process II: Working with Community Groups. In: Community Work. Practical Social Work. Palgrave, London. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-349-21262-0_3.
29. Wolf M., Söbke H., Wehking F. (2020). Mixed Reality Media-Enabled Public Participation in Urban Planning. In: Jung T., tom Dieck M., Rauschnabel P. (eds) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_11.
Article
Received: 06.01.2021
Accepted: 19.03.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Kharchenko, K. V. (2021) ’The Capacity of Target Groups of the Population as a Factor of Integration of the Social Space in a Locality’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(1), pp. 124-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.1.7877.
Section
REGIONAL SOCIOLOGY
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)