Types of Justice in Contractual Relationships

Research Article
  • Denis N. Briket Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation unsade@mail.ru
How to Cite
Briket D.N. 2021. Types of Justice in Contractual Relationships — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 172-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.1.7880

Abstract

To analyze the manifestations of social injustice in various situations in society, it is necessary first of all to study how it arises in interpersonal interaction. In the studies of foreign authors on this issue, the logic inherent to the theory of social exchange by G. Homans appears implicitly or explicitly. The article describes which theories Homans based on when creating his concept, how the individual’s actions are influenced by the “rewards” and “costs” received by him, and why Homans was not afraid to defend the methodological principle of psychological reductionism. This paper discusses the propositions of this theory and their applicability in assessing the phenomenon of social justice, whether it is a distributional, procedural or interactional orientation. Distributive justice examines how the parties to social exchange assess the fairness of the “rewards” received; to the sphere of procedural studies – the “honesty” of the procedures and processes by which the distribution of “rewards” is made; the area of interest of the interactionist direction is the actor himself, who participates in the process of social exchange. The article also examines the specifics of such types of social exchange as contractual and mutual. A contractual type of social exchange is a relationship in which agreements and conditions are jointly established, thanks to which it becomes possible to receive “rewards”. In contrast to contractual social exchange, mutual exchange is not supported by any legal restrictions. The article describes why the hypothesis that the contractual type of social exchange will be viewed by the participants as more equitable has not been confirmed. In addition, this paper analyzes the suitability of using contractual and mutual social exchange in the context of G. Homans theory of social exchange, and the relevance of their consideration within the framework of the concept of “rewards” and “costs”.
Keywords:
social exchange, social interaction, rewards, punishments, distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, negotiated exchange, reciprocal exchange

Author Biography

Denis N. Briket, Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
Research Laboratory Assistant

References

1. Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl’. (1994). [American sociological thought]. Ed. by V. I. Dobrenkov. M. : MGU publ. 495 p. (In Russ.)

2. Devyatko I. F. (2013). Obmena sotsial’nogo teorii. [Social sharing theory]. Bol’shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya: [v 35 t.] Ed. by Yu. S. Osipov. M. : Bol’shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya publ. Vol. 23. P. 487–488. (In Russ.)

3. Zimmel G. (1996). Izbrannoye. V 2 t. [Favorites. In 2 vol.]. Ed. by L. T. Mil’skaya. M. : Jurist publ. Vol. 1. 670 p. (In Russ.)

4. Zimmel G. (2008). Ekskurs o chuzhake. [Excursion about a stranger]. Per. A. Filippova. Sociological theory: history, modernity, prospects. Vladimir Dal publ. P. 9–14. (In Russ.)

5. Mill’ D. (2012). Ob opredelenii predmeta politicheskoi ekonomii i o metode issledovaniya, svoistvennom ei. [On the definition of the subject of political economy and on the method of research peculiar to it]. Filosofiya ekonomiki. Antologiya. Ed. by D. Khausman. M. : Institut Gaidara publ. P. 987–1023. (In Russ.)

6. Osipov G. V. (1993). Istoriya sotsiologii v Zapadnoy Yevrope i SShA. [The history of sociology in Western Europe and the USA]. M. : Norma publ. 423 p. (In Russ.)

7. Ritzer J. (2002). Sovremennyye sotsiologicheskiye teorii. [Modern sociological theories]. 5th ed. St. Petersburg: Peter publ. 688 p. (In Russ.)

8. Smith A. (2007). Issledovaniye o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations], M.: Eksmo publ. (In Russ.)

9. Khomans Dzh. (1984). Sotsial’noe povedenie kak obmen. [Social behavior as an exchange]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya sotsial’naya psikhologiya. Ed. by V. I. Dobren’kov. M. : Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta publ. P. 82–91. (In Russ.)

10. Khomans Dzh. (2001). Sotsial’noe povedenie: ego elementarnye formy. [Social behavior: its elementary forms]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Seriya 11. Sotsiologiya. № 2. P. 117–163. (In Russ.)

11. Abrahamson B. (1970). Homans on exchange. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 76. P. 273–284. (In Russ.)

12. Adams J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. P. 267–299.

13. Berger J., Anderson B., Cohen B. (1972). Structural Aspects of Distributive Justice: A Status Value Formulation. Sociological Theories in Progress. Vol. II. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. P. 119–146.

14. Bies R. (2001). Interactional (In)Justice: The Sacred and the Profane. Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford University Press. P. 89–118.

15. Collett J. L. (2011). (Re)Integrating Simmel in Contemporary Social Exchange: The Effect of Nonpartisans on Relational Outcomes. Social Forces. Vol. 90. № 2. P. 617–637.

16. Ekeh P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge (Mass.). 237 p.

17. Hegtvedt K., Killian C. (1999). Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces. Vol. 78. № 1. P. 269–302 DOI: 10.1093/sf/78.1.269.

18. Goffman E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face interaction. Chicago : Aldine.

19. Homans G. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 386 p.

20. Jameson S. Principles of Social Interaction. American Sociological Review. 1945. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 6–12.

21. Jasso G. (1980). A New Theory of Distributive Justice. American Sociological Review. Vol. 45. № 1. P. 3–32.

22. Leventhal G., Jurgis K., J. and Fry W. (1980). Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences. Justice and Social Interaction. № 3. P. 167–218.

23. Lind E., Tyler T. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4

24. Molm L. D., Peterson G., Takahashi N. (2003). In the Eye of the Beholder: Procedural Justice in Social Exchange. American Sociological Review. Vol. 68. № 1. P. 128–152.

25. Molm L., Collett J., Schaefer D. (2006). Conflict and Fairness in Social Exchange. Social Forces. Vol. 84. № 4. P. 2331–2352.

26. Swanson G. (1965). On Explanations of Social Interaction. Sociometry. Vol. 28. № 2. Р. 101–123.
Article

Received: 30.11.2020

Accepted: 19.03.2021

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Briket, D. N. (2021) ’Types of Justice in Contractual Relationships’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(1), pp. 172-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.1.7880.