Attitude to Immigrants in the Mass Consciousness of Europeans (using the example of secondary analysis of ESS 2016 data)

Research Article
  • Alexander V. Zhavoronkov Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation larkzhav@yandex.ru
    Elibrary Author_id 588936
  • Nataliya S. Voronina Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS; State Academic University of Humanities (GAUGN), Moscow, Russian Federation navor@bk.ru ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-6803
    Elibrary Author_id 725230
    ResearchID AAC-7585-2019
How to Cite
Zhavoronkov A.V., Voronina N.S. 2021. Attitude to Immigrants in the Mass Consciousness of Europeans (using the example of secondary analysis of ESS 2016 data) — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 42-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.2.8102

Abstract

The article describes the experience of improving the methodology for identifying diversity and homogeneity in the behaviour of complex social objects. The subject area of the study in it is, on the one hand, methods of obtaining sociological knowledge of them adequate to the semantics of social processes, and on the other, specific areas of the process of forming stable types of attitudes towards immigrants among the population of various European countries. To obtain pictures of what is happening, the authors use a toolkit that has been tested in a wide range of studies, the basis of which is the identification of areas (hereinafter referred to as applications, equally semantic fields) of mass consciousness on the basis of the application of the Tay-b-Kendall correlation coefficients. A feature of the approach is the complete alignment of all indicators in relation to each of the studied countries and to all countries together. The initial alignment of parameters at the level of primary data, standardization of two-dimensional matrices of combinatorial statistical contingency tables of a number of features made it possible to build a comparative portrait of the unity and diversity of stereotypes of the mass consciousness in relation to some aspects of immigration in European countries. The total volume of the analyzed array for 2016 for 23 countries is 44487 respondents. The results, some of which are presented in the article, make it possible to optimize the tool for differentiating countries in relation to immigrants.
Keywords:
European countries, Russian Federation, conjugation of assessments of the usefulness of immigration and degrees of benevolence towards immigrants’, peculiarities of polarization / unity of countries in relation to immigrant’s, correlation analysis, entropy values, analysis of variance, qualitative components of semantic fields homogeneity

Author Biographies

Alexander V. Zhavoronkov, Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
Doctor of Sociology, Chief Researcher
Nataliya S. Voronina, Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS; State Academic University of Humanities (GAUGN), Moscow, Russian Federation
Candidate of Sociology, Senior Researcher

References

1. ZHavoronkov A. V. (2016). Opyt izmereniya zhiznennykh orientatsij. [Experience in measuring life orientations]. Rossiya reformiruyuschayasya: Ezhegodnik. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. M: Novyj khronograf publ. Vol. 14. P. 79–112. (In Russ.).

2. Kendel M. Dzh. (1975). Rangovye korrelyatsii. [Rank correlations]. Ed. by E. M. CHetyrkina, R. M. Entova. M.: Statistika publ. 214 p. (In Russ.).

3. Mastikova N. S. (2019). Otnoshenie k migrantam i privnosimym imi izmeneniyam: otsenki rossiyan i evropejtsev. [Attitudes towards migrants and the changes they bring: assessments of Russians and Europeans]. Vestnik Instituta sotziologii. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 55–71. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.604 (In Russ.).

4. Migranty, migrantofobii i migratsionnaya politika. (2014). [Migrants, migrant phobia and migration policy]. Ed. by V. I. Mukomel’. M.: NP «Central’nyj Dom advokata», Moskovskoe byuro po pravam cheloveka, «Academia» publ. 245 p. (In Russ.).

5. Akima H. (1978). A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. Vol. 4, P. 144–159.

6. Gorodzeisky A., Semyonov M. (2019). Unwelcome immigrants: sources of opposition to different immigrant groups among Europeans. Frontiers in Sociology. Vol. 4, № 24. P. 1–10. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00024

7. Mayda A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 88, № 3. P. 510–530.

8. Meuleman B., Davidov E., BillietJ. (2009). Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007. A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research. Vol. 38, № 2. P. 352–365.

9. Ponizovskiy V. A. (2016). Values and attitudes towards immigrants: cross-cultural differences across 25 countries. Psysergeevnachology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 256–272. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2016-2-256-272.

10. Wilkes R. and Corrigall-Brown C. (2011). Explaining time trends in public opinion: attitudes towards immigration and immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. № 52. P. 79–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715210379460
Article

Received: 15.03.2021

Accepted: 30.06.2021

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Zhavoronkov, A. V. and Voronina, N. S. (2021) ’Attitude to Immigrants in the Mass Consciousness of Europeans (using the example of secondary analysis of ESS 2016 data)’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(2), pp. 42-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.2.8102.