Attitude to Immigrants in the Mass Consciousness of Europeans (using the example of secondary analysis of ESS 2016 data)
Research Article
Abstract
References
2. Kendel M. Dzh. (1975). Rangovye korrelyatsii. [Rank correlations]. Ed. by E. M. CHetyrkina, R. M. Entova. M.: Statistika publ. 214 p. (In Russ.).
3. Mastikova N. S. (2019). Otnoshenie k migrantam i privnosimym imi izmeneniyam: otsenki rossiyan i evropejtsev. [Attitudes towards migrants and the changes they bring: assessments of Russians and Europeans]. Vestnik Instituta sotziologii. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 55–71. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.604 (In Russ.).
4. Migranty, migrantofobii i migratsionnaya politika. (2014). [Migrants, migrant phobia and migration policy]. Ed. by V. I. Mukomel’. M.: NP «Central’nyj Dom advokata», Moskovskoe byuro po pravam cheloveka, «Academia» publ. 245 p. (In Russ.).
5. Akima H. (1978). A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. Vol. 4, P. 144–159.
6. Gorodzeisky A., Semyonov M. (2019). Unwelcome immigrants: sources of opposition to different immigrant groups among Europeans. Frontiers in Sociology. Vol. 4, № 24. P. 1–10. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00024
7. Mayda A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 88, № 3. P. 510–530.
8. Meuleman B., Davidov E., BillietJ. (2009). Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007. A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research. Vol. 38, № 2. P. 352–365.
9. Ponizovskiy V. A. (2016). Values and attitudes towards immigrants: cross-cultural differences across 25 countries. Psysergeevnachology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 256–272. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2016-2-256-272.
10. Wilkes R. and Corrigall-Brown C. (2011). Explaining time trends in public opinion: attitudes towards immigration and immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. № 52. P. 79–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715210379460
Received: 15.03.2021
Accepted: 30.06.2021






Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)