On the Role of the Goal-Setting in Human Activity and Social Development

Research Article
  • Alexander B. Veber Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation mailbox@polisma.ru
    Elibrary Author_id 490643
How to Cite
Veber A.B. 2021. On the Role of the Goal-Setting in Human Activity and Social Development — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 7-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.4.8602

Abstract

The goals of human activity are diverse, ambiguous and often opposite. In the article, goal-setting is seen in the context of the concepts of freedom and necessity, as a subject-object attitude, from the point of view of a dual role of consciousness – as knowledge (usually incomplete, personal, sometimes distorted) about the object to which the action of the subject is directed, and as an attitude to the object. The goal-setting is determined by the needs of the person, his interests in material life and other spheres. The dominance of the market order and private interests in an individualized society gives social development a spontaneous character – a development driven by many different goals, but not by common purpose. In the process of social development a discord is arising between private interests and social needs. Hence there is the need for development guided by social foresight in order to prevent threatening tendencies. In the light of global challenges and threats, the optimal combining of private and common human interests is becoming an increasingly urgent task, requiring changes in traditional priorities. The Sustainable Development Goals approved by the UN summits should be considered in terms of creating conditions for the survival of mankind.
Keywords:
the goals of human activity, private interests, market order, spontaneous development, social foresight, sustainable development

Author Biography

Alexander B. Veber, Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Chief Researcher

References

1. Bauman Z. (2005). Individualizirovannoe obschestvo. [The Individualized Society]. M. : Logos publ. 390 p. (In Russ.).

2. Belik A. A. (2013). Chelovek v ekonomicheskoj antropologii. [Man in Economic Anthropology]. M. : Ippolitova publ. 370 p. (In Russ.).

3. Braudel F. (1993). The Dynamics of Capitalism. Smolensk : Poligramma publ. 124 p. (In Russ.).

4. Gor A. (1999). Earth on the Balance: Forging a New Common Purpose // Novaya industrial’naya volna na Zapade: Antologiya. M. : 1999. P. 555–571. (In Russ.).

5. Danilov-Danil’yan V. I. (2006). Ustojchivoe razvitie. [Sustainable Development]. Globalistika: Mezhdunarodnyj enziklopedicheskij slovar’. M. : St. Petersburg : New York : ELIMA publ., PITER publ. P. 925. (In Russ.).

6. Kagan M. S. (1974). Chelovecheskaya deyatel’nost’ (Opyt sistemnogo analiza). [Human Activity (Experience of System Analysis)]. M. : Politizdat publ. 328 p. (In Russ.).

7. Kapitsa S. P. (1999). Obschaya teoriya rosta chelovechestva: skol’ko lyudej zhilo, zhivet i budet zhit’ na Zemle. [General theory of human growth: how many people lived, lives and will live on Earth]. M. : Nauka publ. 189 p. (In Russ.).

8. Koslowski P. (1996). Etika kapitalisma; Evolutziya i obschestvo. [Ethik des Kapitalismus; Evolution und Gesellschaft]. St. Petersburg : Ekonomicheskaia shkola publ. 157 p. (In Russ.).

9. Moiseev N. N. (1995). Sovremennyj ratsionalism. [Modern Rationalism]. M. : MGVP KOKS publ. 376 p. (In Russ.).

10. Polanyi M. (1985). Lichnostnoe znanie: na put’i k postkriticheskoj filosofii. [Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy]. M. : Progress publ. 344 p. (In Russ.).

11. Polanyi K. (2002). Velikaya transformatsiya: politicheskie i ekonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni. [The Great Transformation: the Political and Economic Origins of Our Time]. St. Peterburg : Aleteiya publ. 311 p. (In Russ.).

12. Polanyi K. (2010). Izbrannye raboty. [Selected works]. M. : Territoriya buduschego publ. 200 p. (In Russ.).

13. Porshnev B. F. (1974). O nachale chelovecheskoj istorii (problemy paleopsihologii). [About the beginning of human history (The problems of paleopsycology]. M. : Mysl’ publ. 487 p. (In Russ.).

14. Smith A. (2016). Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. [Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations]. M. : Eksmo publ. 1056 p. (In Russ.).

15. Fromm E. (1986). Imet’ ili Byt’? [To Have or to Be?]. M. : Progress publ. 238 p. (In Russ.).

16. Hayek F. A. (2012). Doroga k rabstvu. [The Road to Serfdom]. M. : Astrel’ publ. 317 p. (In Russ.).

17. Hayek F. A. (1992). Pagubnaya samonadeyannost’. Oshibki sotsialisma. [The Fatal Conceit. The Errors of Socialism]. M.: Novosti publ. and “Catallaxy” publ. 304 p. (In Russ.).

18. Huntington S. P. (2004). Politicheskij poryadok v menyayuschihsya obschestvah. [Political Order in Changing Societies]. M. : Progress-Traditsiya publ. 480 p. (In Russ.).

19. Schlezinger Jr. A.M. (1992). Tsikly amerikanskoj istorii. [The cycles of American history]. M. : Progress-Akademiya publ. 688 p. (In Russ.).

20. Elias N. (2001). Obschestvo individov. [Die Gesellschaft der Individuen]. M. : Praxis publ. 331 p. (In Russ.).

21. Hirsch F. (1978). Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press. 202 p.

22. Judt T. (2011). Ill Fares the Land. A Treatise on Our Present Discontents. L. : Penguin Books. 256 p.
Article

Received: 31.05.2021

Accepted: 02.12.2021

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Veber, A. B. (2021) ’On the Role of the Goal-Setting in Human Activity and Social Development’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(4), pp. 7-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.4.8602.