Long-Term Plans and Potential for Social and Cultural Integration of Migrants (Example of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia))

Research Article
How to Cite
Kuznetsov I.M. 2021. Long-Term Plans and Potential for Social and Cultural Integration of Migrants (Example of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)) — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 146-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.4.8612

Abstract

The article, based on the data of a survey of migrants conducted in 2020 in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), analyzes the statistically valid relationship of variations in long-term plans of migrants with variables reflecting socio-cultural aspects of their integration potential. The analysis showed that migrants who are focused on settling in a host society (as compared to those who are focused on temporary employment) more often express their desire to settle in the neighborhood with representatives of the local population and more often live in the neighborhood of local population. They are more likely to work in teams where migrants and locals are approximately equally represented. Hence, they are more included in the space of primary socialization in the host society. More often they have friends among the local population, with whom they spend their leisure time. This category of migrants is characterized by a high degree of identity with the host community, but without loss of identification with the communities of the country of departure (country, ethnic, religious, etc.). As a result, it is concluded that migrants who have plans to settle in the host environment have a higher integration potential.
Keywords:
potential of socio-cultural integration, involvement in the integration process, long-term plans of migrants, identification of migrants

Author Biography

Igor M. Kuznetsov, Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
Candidate of Sociology, Leading Researcher

References

1. Arutyunova E., Kuznetsov I. (2021). Integratsionnyy potentsial prinimayushchego obshchestva: sravnitelnaya regionalnaya perspektiva [The Integration Potential of the Host Society: A Comparative Regional Perspective]. Mir Rossii. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 6–25. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X2021-30-2-6-25. (In Russ.).

2. Denisenko M., Mukomel V. (2020). Trudovaya migratsiya v Rossii v period koronavirusnoy pandemii. [Labour migration in Russia during the coronavirus pandemic] Demograficheskoye obozreniye. № 7(3). P. 84–107. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v7i3.11637. (In Russ.).

3. Kuznetsov I. M. (2008). Migranty v megapolise i provintsii: variativnost realizatsii integratsionnogo potentsiala. [Migrants in the megalopolis and provinces: the variability of the implementation of the integration potential]. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. Yezhegodnik. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Vyp. 7. M. : Institut sotsiologii RAN publ. P. 273–288. (In Russ.).

4. Mezhetnicheskaya napryazhyonnost v menyayushchemsya sotsialnom kontekste: rezultaty issledovaniya. INAB. 2017. № 1. [Interethnic tensions in a changing social context: research results. INAB. 2017. № 1]. Ed. by M. F. Chernysh. M. : FNISTS RAN publ. 133 p. DOI 10.19181/inab.2017.1. (In Russ.).

5. Mukomel V. I. (2017). Migranty na rossiyskom rynke truda: zanyatost, mobilnost, intensivnost i oplata truda. [Migrants at the Russian labor market: occupations, mobility, intensity of labor and wages]. Statistics and Economics. № 6. P. 69–79. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2017-6-69-79. (In Russ.).

6. Pozitivnyye mezhnatsionalnyye otnosheniya i preduprezhdeniye neterpimosti: opyt Tatarstana v obshcherossiyskom kontekste. Ed. by L. M. Drobizheva, S. V. Ryzhova. Institut sotsiologii RAN publ. M. ; SPb. : Nestor-Istoriya. P. 88–117. (In Russ.).

7. Sotsialnaya sreda rossiyskikh gorodov v vospriyatii «gastarbayterov» i mestnogo naseleniya. (2010). [The social environment of Russian cities in the perception of “guest workers” and the local population]. M. : IS RAN publ. 83 p. (In Russ.).

8. Trudovaya migratsiya i politika integratsii migrantov v Germanii i Rossii. (2016). [Labor migration and the policy of integration of migrants in Germany and Russia]. Ed. by M. S. Rozanova. Per. s angl. M. S. Rozanovoy i A. B. Lesokhina. SPb. : Tsentr grazhdanskikh, sotsialnykh, nauchnykh i kulturnykh initsiativ «STRATEGIYA» ; Skifiya-print. 192 p. (In Russ.).

9. Endryushko A. A. (2020). Integratsiya v rossiyskoye obshchestvo migrantov iz Azerbaydzhana i drugikh stran postsovetskogo prostranstva: sravnitelnyy analiz. [Benchmarking in Integration of migrants from Azerbaijan and other post-Soviet countries] Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. № 11. P. 84–95 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009906-9. (In Russ.).

10. Basch L., Glick-Schiller N. and Szanton-Blanc C. (1994). Nations unbound: transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Langhorne, PA. 356 p.

11. Solano G. & Huddleston T. (2020). Migrant Integration Policy Index 2020. Barcelona / Brussels : CIDOB and MPG: URL: https://www.mipex.eu (date of access: 13.06.2021).
Article

Received: 17.06.2021

Accepted: 02.12.2021

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Kuznetsov, I. M. (2021) ’Long-Term Plans and Potential for Social and Cultural Integration of Migrants (Example of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia))’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(4), pp. 146-161. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.4.8612.