Social and Communication Mechanisms of Adaptation of the Population to the Crisis Conditions of the Pandemic in the all-Russian, Regional and Sectoral Context
Research Article
Abstract
References
2. Doklad «O sostoyanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva v 2019 godu». [Report “On the state of civil society in the Russian Federation for 2019”]. Obshchestvennaja palata RF. URL: https://report2019.oprf.ru/ (date of access: 01.09.2021). (In Russ).
3. Mersiyanova I. V., Ivanova N. V. (2021). Sektor NKO i volonterstvo: izmeneniya na puti v postkrizisnuyu epokhu. [NGOs and volunteering: changes on the way in the post-crisis era]. «CHyornyj lebed» v beloj maske. Analiticheskij doklad NIU VSHE k godovshchine pandemii COVID-19. Ed. by S. M. Plaksin, A. B. ZHulin, S. A. Farizova. М.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki publ. P. 117–148. (In Russ).
4. Sinyavskaya O. V. (2021). Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na sotsial’nuyu politiku v mire i v Rossii. [The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social policy in the world and in Russia]. «CHyornyj lebed» v beloj maske. Analiticheskij doklad NIU VSHE k godovshchine pandemii COVID-19. Ed. by S. M. Plaksin, A. B. ZHulin, S. A. Farizova. М.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki publ. P. 39–54. (In Russ).
5. Sovremennyj slovar po obshchestvennym naukam. (2013). [Modern Dictionary of Social Sciences]. M.: Infra-M publ. 314 p. (In Russ).
6. Frumin I. D., Bryzgalova S. M., Zair-Bek S. I., Karlov I. A., Kosareckij S. G., Leshukov O. V., Pavlov A. V. Transformatsiya obrazovaniya v usloviyakh pandemii. [Transformation of education in the context of a pandemic]. «CHyornyj lebed» v beloj maske. Analiticheskij doklad NIU VSHE k godovshchine pandemii COVID-19. Ed. by S. M. Plaksin, A. B. ZHulin, S. A. Farizova. М.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki publ. P. 83–117. (In Russ).
7. Tsagarejshvili S. A. (2020). Onlajn-aktivnost opernykh teatrov v period pandemii-2020: novye vyzovy. [Online activity of opera houses during the pandemic 2020: new challenges]. Reklamnyj vektor. Sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. M.: RUDN publ. P. 339–342. (In Russ).
8. Chumikov A. N. (2021). Antikrizisnye kommunikatsii. [Anti-crisis communications]. M.: Prospekt publ. 190 p. (In Russ).
9. Adams S. (2017). Win Bigly. Persuasion in a world where facts where facts don’t matter. USA, Portfolio. 304 p.
10. Amstutz M. R. (1982). An introduction to political science. The management of conflict. Scott: Foresman and Company. 454 p.
11. Dahrendorf R. (1988). The modern social conflict: an essay on the politics of liberty. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. 291 p.
12. Layton D. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. D. Layton, E. Jenkins, S. Macgill, A. D. Driffield. East Yorkshire, UK: Studies in Education. 159 p.
13. The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey / H. J. Larson, A. de Figueiredo, Z. Xiahong [and oth.]. EBioMedicine. 2016. Vol. 12. P. 295–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.042.
14. Welcome Global Monitor 2019. Welcome Trust : [sait]. 29 November 2021. URL: https://cms. wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wgm2018-country-data-all.pdf (date of access: 01.09.2021).
15. Wolfe R. M. (2002). Anti-vaccination past. And present. R. M. Wolfe, L. K. Sharp. British Medical Journal. Vol. 325 (7361). P. 430–431. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7361.430.
Received: 03.09.2021
Accepted: 16.03.2022