Social Justice in the Collective Perceptions of the Population of the Regions of the South of Russia in the Context of the Formation of the All-Russian Identity
Research Article
Acknowledgments
The article was prepared as part of the implementation of the program of fundamental applied scientific research on the topic: “Ethnocultural diversity of Russian society and strengthening of the all-Russian identity” 2020–2022 under the project “Social justice in ensuring the harmonization of interethnic relations and strengthening of the all-Russian identity of the population in the South of Russia” (state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, internal number GZ0110/21-04-RG).
How to Cite
Volkov Y.G. 2022. Social Justice in the Collective Perceptions of the Population of the Regions of the South of Russia in the Context of the Formation of the All-Russian Identity — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 63-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2022.10.3.9197
Abstract
The article is devoted to an overview analysis of the results of the research project “Social justice in ensuring the harmonization of interethnic relations and strengthening the all-Russian identity of the population in the South of Russia”, The data obtained during the work on the project are considered in the context of the problem of forming a unified all-Russian civic identity, which sets a specific angle for analyzing the responses of respondents reflecting the collective ideas of the population of the regions of Southern Russia about social justice. The specificity of the chosen approach to the study is determined by the fact that the study of ideas about justice in the mass consciousness is carried out through the prism of interethnic relations in the regions of Southern Russia, which makes it possible to identify and assess the state of the process of formation of all-Russian identity in ethnic groups living in the South of Russia, the presence and level of severity of interethnic contradictions. The author of the article shows, based on empirical data obtained in the course of the study, that interethnic relations in the southern regions of Russia currently have a generally positive character, the ethnic factor is not an object of politicization, in the representation of ethnic groups there are social opportunities and legal responsibility, which indicates the emerging priority of the emerging all-Russian civic identity in relation to ethno-group identities. At the same time, it is emphasized in the article, fairness in interethnic interactions is assessed by respondents mainly by the criterion of the absence of preferences from the local authorities in relation to a particular ethnic group when solving issues of everyday socio-economic life, creating equal opportunities for intergenerational reproduction and broadcasting of ethno-cultural identities.
Keywords:
interethnic relations, ethnic groups, justice, all-Russian civic identity, socio-cultural trauma, interethnic contradictions, values, social integration
References
1. Avksent’ev V. A., Aksyumov B. V., Gritsenko G. D. (2020). Etnichnost’ v politicheskih konfliktah: etnizatsija politiki i politizatsija etnichnosti. Politicheskaja nauka. № 1. P. 73–97. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2020.03.04 (In Russ.).
2. Badmaev V. N. (2010). Pogranichnost’ sotsiokul’turnogo prostranstva YUga Rossii. Vestnik Majkopskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta. № 2. P. 82–85. (In Russ.).
3. Bineeva N. K. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v sisteme mezhetnicheskih otnoshenij v yuzhno-rossijskih regionah s raznym administrativnym statusom. Gumanitarij YUga Rossii. Vol. 10, № 6. P. 104–121. DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.6.8. (In Russ.).
4. Bineeva N. K., CHernobrovkina N. I., Mamina D. A. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v regulirovanii mezhetnicheskih otnoshenij na yuge Rossii: opyt sotsiologicheskogo issledovanijam. Rossija reformiruyushhajasja: ezhegodnik: vyp. 19. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. M. : Novyj Hronograf, P. 444–461. DOI 10.19181/ezheg.2021.19. (In Russ.).
5. Boltanski L., Teveno L. (2013). Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti: Ocherki sotsiologii gradov. Per. c fr. O. V. Kovenevoj; nauch. red. perevoda N. E. Koposov. M. : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie publ. 576 p. (In Russ.).
6. Brubejker R. (2012). Etnichnost’ bez grupp. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 408 p. (In Russ.).
7. Vereshhagina A. V., Bineeva N. K., Vojtenko V. P. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v razvitii polietnichnogo regional’nogo prostranstva Respubliki Krym: rezul’taty massovogo oprosa. Sotsiologija. № 6. P. 122–131. (In Russ.).
8. Vojtenko V. P., Panteleev V. G. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v kollektivnyh predstavlenijah etnicheskih grupp Krasnodarskogo kraja. Vestnik YUzhno-Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 55–63. DOI 10.17213/2075-20672021-6-55-63. (In Russ.).
9. Gofman A. B. (2017). Spravedlivost’ kak sotsiologicheskaja ideja: ot klassiki k sovremennosti. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshhestvo. Vol. XIX, vyp. 1–2. № 93-94. P. 65–79. (In Russ.).
10. Denisova G. S., CHernobrovkina N. I. (2020). Ekspertnaja otsenka etnopoliticheskoj situatsii v Kalmykii: interpretatsija v kontekste teorii spravedlivosti. Gumanitarij YUga Rossii. Vol. 9. № 6. P. 158–170. DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2020.6.13. (In Russ.).
11. Denisova G. S. (2020). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v mezhetnicheskih otnoshenijah. Mir nauki. Sotsiologija, filologija, kul’turologija. № 4. URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/27SCSK420.pdf (data obrashhenija: 20.01.2022). (In Russ.).
12. Drobizheva L. M. (2020). Depolitizatsija etnichnosti: mezhdu iskusheniem novymi teorijami i sotsial’noj praktikoj. Rossija reformiruyushhajasja: ezhegodnik. Vyp. 18. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. M.: Novyj Hronograf publ. P. 202–224. DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2020.9. (In Russ.).
13. Pecherskaja N. V. (2011). Spravedlivost’: mezhdu pravdoj i istinoj. (Istorija formirovanija kontsepta v russkoj kul’ture). «Pravda». Diskursy spravedlivosti v russkoj intellektual’noj istorii. M.: ID «Klyuch-S» publ. P. 15–48. (In Russ.).
14. Rachkov P. A. Pravda-spravedlivost’. (2006). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 7. Filosofija. № 1. P. 83–107. (In Russ.).
15. Simonova T. S. (2019). Osobennosti razreshenija etnicheskih konfliktov na territorii Respubliki Krym posle vhozhdenija v sostav Rossijskoj Federatsii. Molodoj uchenyj. № 21 (259). P. 454–456. (In Russ.).
16. Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v sfere mezhetnicheskih otnoshenij i ukreplenija obshherossijskoj identichnosti naselenija YUga Rossii. Ed. by YU. G. Volkov. Moskva : RUSAJNS publ. 180 p. (In Russ.).
17. Fajzullin F. S. (2010). Problemy sotsial’noj spravedlivosti v polietnicheskom regione: monografija. Ufa : Izd-vo RIO RUNMTS MO RB. 132 p. (In Russ.).
18. Sotsiologicheskie podhody k izucheniyu sotsial’nogo blagopoluchija. (2021). Ed. by M. F. CHernysh, YU. B. Epihina. M. : FNISTS RAN publ. 431 p. DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-377-5.2021. (In Russ.).
19. Shvets A. B. (2017). Risk politizatsii etnichnosti v Krymu. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov. № 3. P. 5–21. (In Russ.).
20. CHernobrovkina N. I., Bedrik A. V., Mamina D. A. (2021). Otsenka neformal’nogo mezhetnicheskogo kontrakta s pozitsij sotsial’noj spravedlivosti (na primere Respubliki KarachaevoCHerkessija). Sotsiologija. № 6. P. 144–152. (In Russ.).
21. CHernobrovkina N. I., Bineeva N. K., Vojtenko V. P. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v kontekste depolitizatsii etnichnosti (na primere Respubliki Kalmykija). Gumanitarij YUga Rossii. № 5. P. 171–192. DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.5.12. (In Russ.).
2. Badmaev V. N. (2010). Pogranichnost’ sotsiokul’turnogo prostranstva YUga Rossii. Vestnik Majkopskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta. № 2. P. 82–85. (In Russ.).
3. Bineeva N. K. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v sisteme mezhetnicheskih otnoshenij v yuzhno-rossijskih regionah s raznym administrativnym statusom. Gumanitarij YUga Rossii. Vol. 10, № 6. P. 104–121. DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.6.8. (In Russ.).
4. Bineeva N. K., CHernobrovkina N. I., Mamina D. A. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v regulirovanii mezhetnicheskih otnoshenij na yuge Rossii: opyt sotsiologicheskogo issledovanijam. Rossija reformiruyushhajasja: ezhegodnik: vyp. 19. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. M. : Novyj Hronograf, P. 444–461. DOI 10.19181/ezheg.2021.19. (In Russ.).
5. Boltanski L., Teveno L. (2013). Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti: Ocherki sotsiologii gradov. Per. c fr. O. V. Kovenevoj; nauch. red. perevoda N. E. Koposov. M. : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie publ. 576 p. (In Russ.).
6. Brubejker R. (2012). Etnichnost’ bez grupp. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 408 p. (In Russ.).
7. Vereshhagina A. V., Bineeva N. K., Vojtenko V. P. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v razvitii polietnichnogo regional’nogo prostranstva Respubliki Krym: rezul’taty massovogo oprosa. Sotsiologija. № 6. P. 122–131. (In Russ.).
8. Vojtenko V. P., Panteleev V. G. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v kollektivnyh predstavlenijah etnicheskih grupp Krasnodarskogo kraja. Vestnik YUzhno-Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 55–63. DOI 10.17213/2075-20672021-6-55-63. (In Russ.).
9. Gofman A. B. (2017). Spravedlivost’ kak sotsiologicheskaja ideja: ot klassiki k sovremennosti. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshhestvo. Vol. XIX, vyp. 1–2. № 93-94. P. 65–79. (In Russ.).
10. Denisova G. S., CHernobrovkina N. I. (2020). Ekspertnaja otsenka etnopoliticheskoj situatsii v Kalmykii: interpretatsija v kontekste teorii spravedlivosti. Gumanitarij YUga Rossii. Vol. 9. № 6. P. 158–170. DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2020.6.13. (In Russ.).
11. Denisova G. S. (2020). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v mezhetnicheskih otnoshenijah. Mir nauki. Sotsiologija, filologija, kul’turologija. № 4. URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/27SCSK420.pdf (data obrashhenija: 20.01.2022). (In Russ.).
12. Drobizheva L. M. (2020). Depolitizatsija etnichnosti: mezhdu iskusheniem novymi teorijami i sotsial’noj praktikoj. Rossija reformiruyushhajasja: ezhegodnik. Vyp. 18. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. M.: Novyj Hronograf publ. P. 202–224. DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2020.9. (In Russ.).
13. Pecherskaja N. V. (2011). Spravedlivost’: mezhdu pravdoj i istinoj. (Istorija formirovanija kontsepta v russkoj kul’ture). «Pravda». Diskursy spravedlivosti v russkoj intellektual’noj istorii. M.: ID «Klyuch-S» publ. P. 15–48. (In Russ.).
14. Rachkov P. A. Pravda-spravedlivost’. (2006). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 7. Filosofija. № 1. P. 83–107. (In Russ.).
15. Simonova T. S. (2019). Osobennosti razreshenija etnicheskih konfliktov na territorii Respubliki Krym posle vhozhdenija v sostav Rossijskoj Federatsii. Molodoj uchenyj. № 21 (259). P. 454–456. (In Russ.).
16. Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v sfere mezhetnicheskih otnoshenij i ukreplenija obshherossijskoj identichnosti naselenija YUga Rossii. Ed. by YU. G. Volkov. Moskva : RUSAJNS publ. 180 p. (In Russ.).
17. Fajzullin F. S. (2010). Problemy sotsial’noj spravedlivosti v polietnicheskom regione: monografija. Ufa : Izd-vo RIO RUNMTS MO RB. 132 p. (In Russ.).
18. Sotsiologicheskie podhody k izucheniyu sotsial’nogo blagopoluchija. (2021). Ed. by M. F. CHernysh, YU. B. Epihina. M. : FNISTS RAN publ. 431 p. DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-377-5.2021. (In Russ.).
19. Shvets A. B. (2017). Risk politizatsii etnichnosti v Krymu. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov. № 3. P. 5–21. (In Russ.).
20. CHernobrovkina N. I., Bedrik A. V., Mamina D. A. (2021). Otsenka neformal’nogo mezhetnicheskogo kontrakta s pozitsij sotsial’noj spravedlivosti (na primere Respubliki KarachaevoCHerkessija). Sotsiologija. № 6. P. 144–152. (In Russ.).
21. CHernobrovkina N. I., Bineeva N. K., Vojtenko V. P. (2021). Sotsial’naja spravedlivost’ v kontekste depolitizatsii etnichnosti (na primere Respubliki Kalmykija). Gumanitarij YUga Rossii. № 5. P. 171–192. DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.5.12. (In Russ.).
Article
Received: 08.05.2022
Accepted: 16.09.2022
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Volkov, Y. G. (2022) ’Social Justice in the Collective Perceptions of the Population of the Regions of the South of Russia in the Context of the Formation of the All-Russian Identity’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 10(3), pp. 63-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2022.10.3.9197.
Section
ETHNOSOCIOLOGY
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)