CHANGING NEOCONSERVATIVE AGENDA: IDEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL PRECONDITIONS (FROM THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN NEOCONSERVATISM)
How to Cite
Matvienko R.A. CHANGING NEOCONSERVATIVE AGENDA: IDEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL PRECONDITIONS (FROM THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN NEOCONSERVATISM). Vlast’ (The Authority). 2016. Vol. 23. No. 7. P. 184-188. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article explores differences between original and contemporary neoconservatives. The author claims that changing neoconservative agenda came from reinforcement of New Left activists within Democratic Party (USA). He argues that development of neoconservatism related to the group of activists of the Democratic Party, so-called Scoop Jackson Democrats. The author underlines the role of Coalition for a Democratic Majority and Committee on the Present Danger in changing the party identification of neoconservatives.
Keywords:
G.McGovern, H. Jackson, New Left, Democratic Party (USA), Coalition for a Democratic Majority, Committee on the Present Danger
References
Гаджиев К.С. 2013. Современный американский консерватизм: социокультурный аспект. - Власть. № 12. С. 104-108
Громыко А. 2007. Метаморфозы американского неоконсерватизма: идеология на излете. - Научно-аналитический журнал «Обозреватель - Observer». № 8. С. 56-67
Жирнов Н.Ф. 2008. Концептуальные основы неоконсерватизма. - Социология власти. № 6. С. 78-87
Boies J., Pichardo N.A. 1993. The Committee on the Present Danger: A Case for the Importance of Elite Social Movement Organizations to Theories of Social Movements and the State. - Berkeley Journal of Sociology. Vol. 38. P. 57-87
Ehrman J. 1995. The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945-1994. New Haven: Yale University Press. 241 p
LeDuc L. 2001. Democratizing Party Leadership Selection. - Party Politics. Vol. 7. No 3. P. 323-341
Schlesinger A.M. 1998. The Vital Center: 50 Years Later. - Society. Vol. 35. No 4. P. 52-55
Soule J.W., McGrath W.E. 1975. A Comparative Study of Presidential Nomination Conventions: The Democrats 1968 and 1972. - American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 19. No 3. P. 501-517
Vaïsse J. 2010. Why Neoconservatism Still Matters. - Policy Paper. No 20. P. ii, 11
Vaïsse J. 2011. Neoconservatism: The Biography of a Movement. Cambridge, Mass., L.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 366 p
Kemble P., Muravchik J. 1972. The New Politics & the Democrats. - Commentary. Vol. 54. No 6. P. 78-84.
Come Home, Democrats. - The New York Times. 1972. December, 7. P. 14.
Громыко А. 2007. Метаморфозы американского неоконсерватизма: идеология на излете. - Научно-аналитический журнал «Обозреватель - Observer». № 8. С. 56-67
Жирнов Н.Ф. 2008. Концептуальные основы неоконсерватизма. - Социология власти. № 6. С. 78-87
Boies J., Pichardo N.A. 1993. The Committee on the Present Danger: A Case for the Importance of Elite Social Movement Organizations to Theories of Social Movements and the State. - Berkeley Journal of Sociology. Vol. 38. P. 57-87
Ehrman J. 1995. The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945-1994. New Haven: Yale University Press. 241 p
LeDuc L. 2001. Democratizing Party Leadership Selection. - Party Politics. Vol. 7. No 3. P. 323-341
Schlesinger A.M. 1998. The Vital Center: 50 Years Later. - Society. Vol. 35. No 4. P. 52-55
Soule J.W., McGrath W.E. 1975. A Comparative Study of Presidential Nomination Conventions: The Democrats 1968 and 1972. - American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 19. No 3. P. 501-517
Vaïsse J. 2010. Why Neoconservatism Still Matters. - Policy Paper. No 20. P. ii, 11
Vaïsse J. 2011. Neoconservatism: The Biography of a Movement. Cambridge, Mass., L.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 366 p
Kemble P., Muravchik J. 1972. The New Politics & the Democrats. - Commentary. Vol. 54. No 6. P. 78-84.
Come Home, Democrats. - The New York Times. 1972. December, 7. P. 14.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Matvienko, R. A. (2016). CHANGING NEOCONSERVATIVE AGENDA: IDEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL PRECONDITIONS (FROM THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN NEOCONSERVATISM). Vlast’ (The Authority), 23(7), 184-188. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/1480
Issue
Section
FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
