Priorities in Social Policy Regarding Differentiated Consumption
How to Cite
Markov V.A., Brovkova A.V. Priorities in Social Policy Regarding Differentiated Consumption. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. Vol. 22. No. 5. P. 10-14. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article describes the situation in the Russian economy and defined the problem of limited resources for the implementation of state social assistance. The authors proposed the transition from the system of indicators in investment and in production to the indicators of consumption from national accounts for the analysis of macroeconomic situation in Russia. The structure of final consumption of the Russian population is studied on this basis. Differences in the structure of final consumption by deciles of the population and in the forms of consumption are shown. Conclusions about social and economic consequences of social expenditures of the federal budget are made; different effectiveness of social transfers in cash and in kind is revealed. Recommendations to improve the structure and direction of state social spending are given.
Keywords:
social policy, differentiation of final consumption, social transfers, uneven performance, government social spending
References
Gorina A.P., Zemskova E.S., Gorin V.A. 2010. Differenciaciya dohodov naseleniya i ehkonomicheskij rost v Rossii. – Shkola universitetskoj nauki: paradigma razvitiya, № 1-2.
Kotel'nikov A.A. 2010. Krugooborot opekaemyh blag v pofaznoj dinamike vosproizvodstva. – Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social'no-ehkonomicheskogo universiteta, № 2.
Markov V.A. 2013. Statisticheskij analiz vliyaniya ehkonomicheskih ustanovok i urovnya sub"ektivnogo ehkonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya na stepen' racional'nosti potrebleniya. – Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social'no-ehkonomicheskogo universiteta, № 4.
Novikov V.A., Artamonova YU.S. 2009. O roli obrazovaniya v racionalizacii potrebitel'skoj deyatel'nosti domashnih hozyajstv. Ehkonomika obrazovaniya, № 2.
Plato K. 2011. Dva goda spustya posle doklada Stiglica–Sena–Fitussi: chtonovogo v statisticheskom izmerenii blagosostoyaniya i ustojchivogo razvitiya obshchectva. – Voprosy statistiki, № 11. P. 3-11.
Rubinshtejn A.YA. 2009. K teorii rynkov opekaemyh blag. Stat'ya 2.
Sociodinamicheskoe opisanie rynkov opekaemyh blag. – Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', № 2. P. 138-150.
Ulyukaev A. 2014. My dolzhny obespechit' snizhenie riskov dlya investorov. – Interfaks, 27.01. URL: http://www.interfax.ru/ txt.asp?id=354033 (accessed 12.02.2014).
Ushakova E.T. 2010. Problemy regulirovaniya rynochnoj ehkonomiki v kursah «Ehkonomicheskaya teoriya» i «EHkonomika obshchestvennogo sektora». – Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, № 1(9).
Kotel'nikov A.A. 2010. Krugooborot opekaemyh blag v pofaznoj dinamike vosproizvodstva. – Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social'no-ehkonomicheskogo universiteta, № 2.
Markov V.A. 2013. Statisticheskij analiz vliyaniya ehkonomicheskih ustanovok i urovnya sub"ektivnogo ehkonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya na stepen' racional'nosti potrebleniya. – Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social'no-ehkonomicheskogo universiteta, № 4.
Novikov V.A., Artamonova YU.S. 2009. O roli obrazovaniya v racionalizacii potrebitel'skoj deyatel'nosti domashnih hozyajstv. Ehkonomika obrazovaniya, № 2.
Plato K. 2011. Dva goda spustya posle doklada Stiglica–Sena–Fitussi: chtonovogo v statisticheskom izmerenii blagosostoyaniya i ustojchivogo razvitiya obshchectva. – Voprosy statistiki, № 11. P. 3-11.
Rubinshtejn A.YA. 2009. K teorii rynkov opekaemyh blag. Stat'ya 2.
Sociodinamicheskoe opisanie rynkov opekaemyh blag. – Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', № 2. P. 138-150.
Ulyukaev A. 2014. My dolzhny obespechit' snizhenie riskov dlya investorov. – Interfaks, 27.01. URL: http://www.interfax.ru/ txt.asp?id=354033 (accessed 12.02.2014).
Ushakova E.T. 2010. Problemy regulirovaniya rynochnoj ehkonomiki v kursah «Ehkonomicheskaya teoriya» i «EHkonomika obshchestvennogo sektora». – Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, № 1(9).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Markov, V. A., & Brovkova, A. V. (2015). Priorities in Social Policy Regarding Differentiated Consumption. Vlast’ (The Authority), 22(5), 10-14. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/2368
Issue
Section
ARRANGEMENT OF RUSSIA: CHALLENGES AND RISKS
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
