About the Expediency of Corporate Codes
How to Cite
Mikhailina S.A. About the Expediency of Corporate Codes. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. Vol. 23. No. 9. P. 16-21. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article discusses the contradictory, divergent manifestations and consequences of the codification of regulators of the corporate culture. The objective of the study of the appropriateness of corporate codes is solved by analyzing the complex functions and bases of formalization of regulators, their practical value and identifying the possible negative consequences of hasty superficial codification, such as moral demagogy, ressentiment, personnel costs, loss of trust and responsibility, identity crisis. Errors of codification include redundancy value judgments, particular standards, unnecessary borrowing, superficial rhetoric, rigid sanctions. The process of formalization of behavioral regularities in the organization should be primarily a full-fledged dialogue on values, common rules and norms of interaction, principles of development between employees and managers. Properly structured communication becomes a condition for the formation of strong internal corporate identity.
Keywords:
codes, codification, corporate culture, ethics, identity
References
Bakshtanovskij V.I., Sogomonov Y.V. 2007. Prikladnaya ehtika: ideya, osnova- niya, sposob sushchestvovaniya. – Voprosy filosofii. № 9. P. 39-49.
Vasil'ev D.V., Drobyshev P.Y., Konov D.V. 2003. Administrativnaya ehtika kak sredstvo protivodejstviya korrupcii. M.: Moskovskij centr Karnegi. Rabochie materialy. № 4. 45 p.
Gazaryan K. 2009. Otechestvo v bezopasnosti. Pochemu russkomu cheloveku krizis ne strashen. – Russkaya zhizn'. № 2-3.
Gradosel'skaya G.V. 2006. Mify novyh rossijskih korporacij. – Neprikosnoven nyj zapas. № 4-5. P. 126-137.
Gusejnov A.A. 1995a. Velikie moralisty. M.: Respublika. 351 p.
Gusejnov A.A. 1995b. Moral'naya demagogiya kak forma apologii nasiliya. – Voprosy filosofii. № 5. P. 5-12.
Dubko E.L. 2005. Politicheskaya ehtika. M.: Akademicheskij proekt; Triksta. 720 p.
Krasnikova E., Panferova N. 2006. Resursy i ogranicheniya korporativnoj ehtiki v sovremennyh rossijskih kompaniyah. – Neprikosnovennyj zapas. № 4-5. P. 139- 146.
Mihajlina S.A. 2013. Social'no-filosofskij analiz povedencheskih regulyativov v korporativnoj kul'ture: avtoref. dis. … k.filos.n. M. 27 p.
Hajek F. 1991. Proiskhozhdenie i dejstvie nashej morali: problema nauki. – Ehko. № 12. P. 177-192.
Hesle V. 1994. Krizis individual'noj i kollektivnoj identichnosti. – Voprosy filosofii. № 10. P. 112-123.
SHeler M. 1999. Ressentiment v strukture moralej. – M.: Nauka. 231 p.
Vasil'ev D.V., Drobyshev P.Y., Konov D.V. 2003. Administrativnaya ehtika kak sredstvo protivodejstviya korrupcii. M.: Moskovskij centr Karnegi. Rabochie materialy. № 4. 45 p.
Gazaryan K. 2009. Otechestvo v bezopasnosti. Pochemu russkomu cheloveku krizis ne strashen. – Russkaya zhizn'. № 2-3.
Gradosel'skaya G.V. 2006. Mify novyh rossijskih korporacij. – Neprikosnoven nyj zapas. № 4-5. P. 126-137.
Gusejnov A.A. 1995a. Velikie moralisty. M.: Respublika. 351 p.
Gusejnov A.A. 1995b. Moral'naya demagogiya kak forma apologii nasiliya. – Voprosy filosofii. № 5. P. 5-12.
Dubko E.L. 2005. Politicheskaya ehtika. M.: Akademicheskij proekt; Triksta. 720 p.
Krasnikova E., Panferova N. 2006. Resursy i ogranicheniya korporativnoj ehtiki v sovremennyh rossijskih kompaniyah. – Neprikosnovennyj zapas. № 4-5. P. 139- 146.
Mihajlina S.A. 2013. Social'no-filosofskij analiz povedencheskih regulyativov v korporativnoj kul'ture: avtoref. dis. … k.filos.n. M. 27 p.
Hajek F. 1991. Proiskhozhdenie i dejstvie nashej morali: problema nauki. – Ehko. № 12. P. 177-192.
Hesle V. 1994. Krizis individual'noj i kollektivnoj identichnosti. – Voprosy filosofii. № 10. P. 112-123.
SHeler M. 1999. Ressentiment v strukture moralej. – M.: Nauka. 231 p.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Mikhailina, S. A. (2015). About the Expediency of Corporate Codes. Vlast’ (The Authority), 23(9), 16-21. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/2959
Issue
Section
POLITICAL PROCESSES AND PRACTICES
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
