Power Legitimation in Terms of Political Modernization as a Stabilization Factor of the Public Administration System
How to Cite
Tyan V.V. Power Legitimation in Terms of Political Modernization as a Stabilization Factor of the Public Administration System. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2016. Vol. 24. No. 7. P. 110-116. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article discusses the technological aspect of the legitimation of power in the discourse of political modernization problems of governance based on the analysis of political practices. The author reveals the nature of renovation and change of power, pre-empting the state of public administration (stability, turbulence, openness). The concept of pre-printed forms and types of governance of para-political modernization paradigm helps to understand the legitimation of power in conditions of modernization with hybrid models of governance. The author considers the role of the institute of presidency in Russia in terms of political modernization.
Keywords:
power, legitimation, modernization, government, management, institution of presidency, evolution
References
Blondel' Zh. 1992. Politicheskoe liderstvo. Put' k vseob"emlyushchemu analizu. – M.: Rossiiskaya akademiya upravleniya. 136 s. (RUS.)
Veber M. 1988. Kharizmaticheskoe gospodstvo. – Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. S. 139-147. (RUS.)
Gutorov V.A. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: istoricheskaya traditsiya i sovremennaya Rossiya. URL: http://www.prof.msu.ru/publ/book3/gutor.htm (accessed 07.06.2016). (RUS.)
Komarovskii V.S. 2000. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: modeli vzaimootnoshenii i vzaimodeistviya. – Formirovanie grazhdanskogo obshchestva kak natsional'naya ideya Rossii XXI veka. – SPb. (RUS.)
Matveenko Yu.I. 2012. Modernizatsiya: teoriya i sovremennost'. – Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 1-1. S. 153-164. (RUS.)
Mikheev V.A. 2015. Instituty grazhdanskogo obshchestva v politike i gosudarstvennom upravlenii. – Vlast'. № 4. S. 53-57. (RUS.)
Parsons T. 2000. O strukture sotsial'nogo deistviya. M.: Akademicheskii proekt. 880 s. (RUS.)
Plyais Ya.A. 2016. Rossiya v poiskakh svoego puti razvitiya (razmyshleniya ob istoricheskom puti Rossii posle revolyutsii 1917 g.). – Vlast'. № 2. S. 51-57. (RUS.)
Timofeeva L.N. 2005. Vlast' i oppozitsiya: konfliktno-diskursnyi analiz (teoriya, istoriya, metodologiya): avtoref. dis. ... d.polit.n. M. URL: http://cheloveknauka.com/vlast-i-oppozitsiya-konfliktno-diskursnyy-analiz (accessed 07.06.2016). (RUS.)
Veber M. 1988. Kharizmaticheskoe gospodstvo. – Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. S. 139-147. (RUS.)
Gutorov V.A. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: istoricheskaya traditsiya i sovremennaya Rossiya. URL: http://www.prof.msu.ru/publ/book3/gutor.htm (accessed 07.06.2016). (RUS.)
Komarovskii V.S. 2000. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: modeli vzaimootnoshenii i vzaimodeistviya. – Formirovanie grazhdanskogo obshchestva kak natsional'naya ideya Rossii XXI veka. – SPb. (RUS.)
Matveenko Yu.I. 2012. Modernizatsiya: teoriya i sovremennost'. – Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 1-1. S. 153-164. (RUS.)
Mikheev V.A. 2015. Instituty grazhdanskogo obshchestva v politike i gosudarstvennom upravlenii. – Vlast'. № 4. S. 53-57. (RUS.)
Parsons T. 2000. O strukture sotsial'nogo deistviya. M.: Akademicheskii proekt. 880 s. (RUS.)
Plyais Ya.A. 2016. Rossiya v poiskakh svoego puti razvitiya (razmyshleniya ob istoricheskom puti Rossii posle revolyutsii 1917 g.). – Vlast'. № 2. S. 51-57. (RUS.)
Timofeeva L.N. 2005. Vlast' i oppozitsiya: konfliktno-diskursnyi analiz (teoriya, istoriya, metodologiya): avtoref. dis. ... d.polit.n. M. URL: http://cheloveknauka.com/vlast-i-oppozitsiya-konfliktno-diskursnyy-analiz (accessed 07.06.2016). (RUS.)
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Tyan, V. V. (2016). Power Legitimation in Terms of Political Modernization as a Stabilization Factor of the Public Administration System. Vlast’ (The Authority), 24(7), 110-116. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/4472
Issue
Section
POLITICAL PROCESSES AND PRACTICES
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
