The Power of Rules and the Rules of Power

  • Dina Vol'demarovna Tombu tombu@sumail.ru
How to Cite
Tombu D.V. The Power of Rules and the Rules of Power. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2016. Vol. 24. No. 7. P. 152-158. (in Russ.).

Abstract

The following article considers the universal rules created by power and defining ethical aspects of the basic spheres of society life. The attention is focused on the difficulties arising from the disappearance of the general ethics and contemporary coexistence of different ideologies, life styles, strategies and values in the modern societies. Besides, the culture, science, politics, religion, family, private life, job, leisure, which have always made an impact on each other, today are not related regulatory; the dynamics of their development follows its own regularity, directed on different aims and circumstances. As a result, the solution of one of the key problems of any social system – the reproduction of meaning of life becomes exigeant. The proof of that – is the global trend of a renewed interest in social-political practice in historically stable forms of identification: social, gender, ethnical, religious. Today, surviving due to each other and competing with each other, Russian citizens orientate on the interests and beliefs defined by themselves, not by the universally binding ones, without submitting to any unified goal or idea. Such a doubtful freedom of choice leads to the people considering equivalent the following: sovereignty and safety of the state, patriotism, rebirth of national industry and wage increase, expansion of consumption possibilities. In Russian society, social-cultural models of life style of the political elite complicate the situation. In the reality, directing a man on the use of economic principles in all the areas of life, without noticing the huge amount of vital problems, contributes to the different social groups realizing their own interests and determining in the boundaries of good and evil by themselves.
Keywords:
power, political elite, norm, political ethics, consumer society

References

Aristotel' 2005. Politika. M.: AST; Tranzitkniga. 393 s. (RUS.)



Goncharova O.Yu., Sidorenko I.N. 2012. Chinovnichestvo: ego vliyanie na ekonomicheskoe razvitie strany. – Uchenye zapiski SKAGS. URL: http://do.gendocs.ru/docs/index-140006.html?page=14#8729619 (accessed 25.03.2016). (RUS.)



Kozlovskii V.V. 2011. Obshchestvo potrebleniya i tsivilizatsionnyi poryadok sovremennosti. – Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii. T. 14. № 5(58). S. 55-64. (RUS.)



Pareto V. 2002. Sotsialisticheskie sistemy. – Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: antologiya. V 2 ch. M.: KD «Universitet». Ch. 1. 424 s. (RUS.)



Popper K. 1992. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. T. 1. Chary Platona. M.: Feniks; Mezhdunarodnyi fond «Kul'turnaya initsiativa». 448 s. (RUS.)



Sutor B. 1997. Politicheskaya etika. URL: http://www.polisportal.ru/files/File/puvlication/Starie_publikacii_Polisa/S/1993-1-8-Sutor-Politicheskaya_etika.pd (accessed 25.03.2016). (RUS.)



Khagurov T. 2011. «Chelovek potreblyayushchii». Antropologicheskaya deviantologiya massovoi kul'tury. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing 329 s. URL: http://deviantology.spb.ru/etc/publications/Khagurov-Chelovek_potreblyayuschiy.pdf (accessed 25.03.2016).



Kheizinga I. 1992. V teni zavtrashnego dnya. S. 9-31. URL: http://romanbook.ru/book/txt/7759906/?key=n30t5lcqimp8f9vqdpc6bs3b83 (accessed 25.02.2016).



Fuko M. 1998. Rozhdenie kliniki. M.: Smysl. 310 s. (RUS.)



Shul'man E. 2015. Prakticheskaya politologiya: posobie po kontaktu s real'nost'yu. M.: Ridero. 75 s. (RUS.)
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Tombu, D. V. (2016). The Power of Rules and the Rules of Power. Vlast’ (The Authority), 24(7), 152-158. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/4480
Section
IDEAS AND MEANINGS