Actors of International Conflicts of New Generation: Attributes, Hierarchy, Modeling Particularities
How to Cite
Degterev D.A. Actors of International Conflicts of New Generation: Attributes, Hierarchy, Modeling Particularities. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2017. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 117-125. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article focuses on the allocation of the main actors of international conflicts of a new generation and on the analysis of their motivation. The author provides classification of actors and levels of their involvement (from defensive to offensive realism). The events of the Arab Spring and the situation in Ukraine in 2014–2015 illustrate that the role of the state is considerably reduced; thereby the role of non-traditional actors is increasing, including business groups, as well as international terrorist groups. The article concludes that the analysis only at the level of national elites and interest groups does not explain most of the international conflicts and needs more comprehensive multi-level analysis of international processes. The author notes that the decisions taken at higher levels, limit the range of alternatives available for the implementation at the lower levels.
Keywords:
actor, subject of international conflict, modeling of international relations, levels of analysis of international relations
References
Afontsev S.A. 2010. Politicheskie rynki i ekonomicheskaya politika. M.: KomKniga. 384 s. (RUS.)
Babintsev V.P. 2012. Imitatsionnye praktiki v gosudarstvennom i munitsipal'nom upravlenii. – Vlast'. № 5. S. 24-29. (RUS.)
Biryukov E.S. 2013. Rol' finansov stran – chlenov SSGAPZ v mirovoi ekonomike. – Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). № 2. S. 189-195. (RUS.)
Bogaturov A.D., Vinogradov A.V. 1999. Model' ravnopolozhennogo razvitiya: varianty «sberegayushchego» obnovleniya. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 4. S. 60-69. (RUS.)
Bogaturov A.D., Kosolapov N.A., Khrustalev M.A. 2002. Ocherki teorii i metodologii politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M.: NOFMO. 390 s. (RUS.)
Gadzhiev K.S. 2016. Razmyshleniya o perspektivakh mir-sistemy. – Vlast'. № 2. S. 5-13. (RUS.)
«Gibridnye voiny» v khaotiziruyushchemsya mire XXI veka (pod red. P.A. Tsygankova). 2015. M.: Izd-vo MGU. 384 s. (RUS.)
Grekov B.I., Solodovnik S.V. 1991. Dinamika sotsial'no-politicheskoi napryazhennosti v Pakistane v 1950–1987 gg. (Opyt kolichestvennogo analiza). – Sistemnyi podkhod: analiz i prognozirovanie mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii (opyt prikladnykh issledovanii): sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pod red. I.G. Tyulina). M.: Izd-vo MGIMO. 164 s. (RUS.)
Degterev D.A. 2010. Vvedenie v teoriyu igr dlya politologov i mezhdunarodnikov. M.: Izd-vo MGIMO-Universiteta. 92 s. (RUS.)
Degterev D.A. 2011. Khartiya o strategicheskom partnerstve mezhdu SShA i Ukrainoi. – Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. № 1-2. S. 85-94. (RUS.)
Degterev D.A. 2015. Setevoi analiz mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. № 4. S. 119-138. (RUS.)
Islamskie radikal'nye dvizheniya na politicheskoi karte sovremennogo mira: Strany Severnoi i Severo-Vostochnoi Afriki (otv. red. A.D. Savateev, E.F. Kisriev). 2015. M.: Lenand. 424 s. (RUS.)
Kozyrev V.A. 2006. Khronicheskie konflikty i faktor Kitaya v ATR. – Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. T. 4. № 2(11). S. 59-77. (RUS.)
Kompleksnaya mezhdistsiplinarnaya metodika RUDN situatsionnogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov (pod red. D.A. Degtereva, V.G. Dzhangiryana, V.A. Tsvyka). 2014. M.: Izd-vo RUDN. 110 s. (RUS.)
Martynov B.F. 2006. «Reliktovye» i potentsial'nye konflikty v Latinskoi Amerike. – Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. T. 4. № 2(11). S. 48-58. (RUS.)
Situatsionnye analizy: uchebnoe posobie. Vypusk 1 (pod red. T.A. Shakleinoi). 2011. M.: Izd-vo MGIMO(U). 235 s. (RUS.)
Sakhibgoryaev V.Kh., Kotov S.V., Ponedelkov A.V. 2016. «Imaginativnaya» priroda fenomenologii «oranzhevoi revolyutsii» na Ukraine. – Vlast'. № 10. S. 198-204. (RUS.)
Khudaikulova A.V. 2005. Sovremennye mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: implikatsii novogo konteksta vzaimozavisimosti. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 6. S. 172-176. (RUS.)
Tsygankov P.A. 2007. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M.: Gardariki. 557 s. (RUS.)
Cherkasova V. 2015. Postmodernistskaya paradigma v politicheskoi teorii: problema SMI. – Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. № 3. S. 114-122. (RUS.)
Conducting Conflict Assessments: Guidance Notes. 2002. DFID, UK. Доступ: http://www.conflictsensitivity.org/sites/default/files/Conducting_Conflict_Assessment_Guidance.pdf
Geller D., Singer D. 1998. Nations at War: A Scientific Study of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mearsheimer J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. N.Y.: W&W Norton & Co.
Putnam R. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. – International Organization. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 427-460.
Quantitative International Politics: Insights and Evidence (ed. by J.D. Singer). 1968. N.Y.: Free Press.
Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies (ed. by J. Soeters, P. Shields, S. Rietjens). 2015. London: Routledge.
Singer D. 1961. The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations. – World Politics. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 77-92.
Temby O. 2013. What are Levels of Analysis and What Do They Contribute to International Relations Theory? – Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 25 November. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557571.2013.831032
Waltz K. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press. 263 р.
Waltz K. 2010. Theory of International Politics. London: Waveland Pr Inc. 251 р.
Wolfers A.A. 1962. Discord and Collaboration. Essay of International Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. 312 р.
Babintsev V.P. 2012. Imitatsionnye praktiki v gosudarstvennom i munitsipal'nom upravlenii. – Vlast'. № 5. S. 24-29. (RUS.)
Biryukov E.S. 2013. Rol' finansov stran – chlenov SSGAPZ v mirovoi ekonomike. – Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). № 2. S. 189-195. (RUS.)
Bogaturov A.D., Vinogradov A.V. 1999. Model' ravnopolozhennogo razvitiya: varianty «sberegayushchego» obnovleniya. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 4. S. 60-69. (RUS.)
Bogaturov A.D., Kosolapov N.A., Khrustalev M.A. 2002. Ocherki teorii i metodologii politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M.: NOFMO. 390 s. (RUS.)
Gadzhiev K.S. 2016. Razmyshleniya o perspektivakh mir-sistemy. – Vlast'. № 2. S. 5-13. (RUS.)
«Gibridnye voiny» v khaotiziruyushchemsya mire XXI veka (pod red. P.A. Tsygankova). 2015. M.: Izd-vo MGU. 384 s. (RUS.)
Grekov B.I., Solodovnik S.V. 1991. Dinamika sotsial'no-politicheskoi napryazhennosti v Pakistane v 1950–1987 gg. (Opyt kolichestvennogo analiza). – Sistemnyi podkhod: analiz i prognozirovanie mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii (opyt prikladnykh issledovanii): sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pod red. I.G. Tyulina). M.: Izd-vo MGIMO. 164 s. (RUS.)
Degterev D.A. 2010. Vvedenie v teoriyu igr dlya politologov i mezhdunarodnikov. M.: Izd-vo MGIMO-Universiteta. 92 s. (RUS.)
Degterev D.A. 2011. Khartiya o strategicheskom partnerstve mezhdu SShA i Ukrainoi. – Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. № 1-2. S. 85-94. (RUS.)
Degterev D.A. 2015. Setevoi analiz mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. № 4. S. 119-138. (RUS.)
Islamskie radikal'nye dvizheniya na politicheskoi karte sovremennogo mira: Strany Severnoi i Severo-Vostochnoi Afriki (otv. red. A.D. Savateev, E.F. Kisriev). 2015. M.: Lenand. 424 s. (RUS.)
Kozyrev V.A. 2006. Khronicheskie konflikty i faktor Kitaya v ATR. – Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. T. 4. № 2(11). S. 59-77. (RUS.)
Kompleksnaya mezhdistsiplinarnaya metodika RUDN situatsionnogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov (pod red. D.A. Degtereva, V.G. Dzhangiryana, V.A. Tsvyka). 2014. M.: Izd-vo RUDN. 110 s. (RUS.)
Martynov B.F. 2006. «Reliktovye» i potentsial'nye konflikty v Latinskoi Amerike. – Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. T. 4. № 2(11). S. 48-58. (RUS.)
Situatsionnye analizy: uchebnoe posobie. Vypusk 1 (pod red. T.A. Shakleinoi). 2011. M.: Izd-vo MGIMO(U). 235 s. (RUS.)
Sakhibgoryaev V.Kh., Kotov S.V., Ponedelkov A.V. 2016. «Imaginativnaya» priroda fenomenologii «oranzhevoi revolyutsii» na Ukraine. – Vlast'. № 10. S. 198-204. (RUS.)
Khudaikulova A.V. 2005. Sovremennye mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: implikatsii novogo konteksta vzaimozavisimosti. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 6. S. 172-176. (RUS.)
Tsygankov P.A. 2007. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M.: Gardariki. 557 s. (RUS.)
Cherkasova V. 2015. Postmodernistskaya paradigma v politicheskoi teorii: problema SMI. – Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. № 3. S. 114-122. (RUS.)
Conducting Conflict Assessments: Guidance Notes. 2002. DFID, UK. Доступ: http://www.conflictsensitivity.org/sites/default/files/Conducting_Conflict_Assessment_Guidance.pdf
Geller D., Singer D. 1998. Nations at War: A Scientific Study of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mearsheimer J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. N.Y.: W&W Norton & Co.
Putnam R. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. – International Organization. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 427-460.
Quantitative International Politics: Insights and Evidence (ed. by J.D. Singer). 1968. N.Y.: Free Press.
Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies (ed. by J. Soeters, P. Shields, S. Rietjens). 2015. London: Routledge.
Singer D. 1961. The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations. – World Politics. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 77-92.
Temby O. 2013. What are Levels of Analysis and What Do They Contribute to International Relations Theory? – Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 25 November. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557571.2013.831032
Waltz K. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press. 263 р.
Waltz K. 2010. Theory of International Politics. London: Waveland Pr Inc. 251 р.
Wolfers A.A. 1962. Discord and Collaboration. Essay of International Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. 312 р.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Degterev, D. A. (2017). Actors of International Conflicts of New Generation: Attributes, Hierarchy, Modeling Particularities. Vlast’ (The Authority), 25(1), 117-125. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/4889
Issue
Section
CHALLENGES OF GLOBALIZATION
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
