Criteria for the Efficiency of Asymmetric Crisis Strategies in the Contemporary Hybrid War
How to Cite
Rybakov A.V., Kvon D.A. Criteria for the Efficiency of Asymmetric Crisis Strategies in the Contemporary Hybrid War. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2018. Vol. 26. No. 7. P. 66-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v26i7.5931 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article analyzes the problems of the asymmetric crises strategies effectiveness under the conditions of the contemporary hybrid war. Hybrid wars today have become an integral part of the new geopolitical realities in the world. However, the absence of system approach to the theory and art of asymmetric crisis management, lack of foresight and clear effectiveness criteria still prevail. The authors provide an analysis of methodology and conceptual backgrounds of the asymmetric crisis strategies approach to the international relations and international security policy. The special attention is paid to the effectiveness criteria of the asymmetric strategies, to the role of the early warning systems in the modern diplomacy and international relations as a whole. The urgent necessity of the broad implementation of the asymmetric crisis approach in the foreign policy of Ukraine is stressed.
Keywords:
asymmetric strategies, crisis resolution, hybrid wars, criteria of effectiveness, asymmetric crisis management, early warning, regional conflicts
References
Deriglazova L.V. 2007. Kontseptsiya asimmetrii v teorii i praktike mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. – Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 295. S. 123-129. URL: http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/vtls:000474564 (accessed 02.07.2018). (RUS.)
Kokoshin A.A. 2017. Metodologicheskie voprosy otsenki ugroz natsional'noi bezopasnosti. – Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 11. S. 19-29. (RUS.)
Binnendijk H. 1998. Engaging Power for Peace: The 1998 Strategic Assessment. Wash., DC: National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies. 283 p.
Metz S., Jonson D. 2001. Asymmetry and US Military Strategy: Definition Background and Strategic Concepts. Strategic Studies Institute. 30 p.
Kokoshin A.A. 2017. Metodologicheskie voprosy otsenki ugroz natsional'noi bezopasnosti. – Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 11. S. 19-29. (RUS.)
Binnendijk H. 1998. Engaging Power for Peace: The 1998 Strategic Assessment. Wash., DC: National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies. 283 p.
Metz S., Jonson D. 2001. Asymmetry and US Military Strategy: Definition Background and Strategic Concepts. Strategic Studies Institute. 30 p.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Rybakov, A. V., & Kvon, D. A. (2018). Criteria for the Efficiency of Asymmetric Crisis Strategies in the Contemporary Hybrid War. Vlast’ (The Authority), 26(7), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v26i7.5931
Issue
Section
SECURITY AND SOCIETY

Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.




